F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Is the 1.525V VDDCR Voltage TPU II secure in this situation?

Is the 1.525V VDDCR Voltage TPU II secure in this situation?

Is the 1.525V VDDCR Voltage TPU II secure in this situation?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
A
aaron1506
Member
207
06-07-2017, 05:38 PM
#1
Hello, I'm experiencing a problem where Aida reports a "SYSTEM FAILURE" during an FPU stress test. The VDDCR voltage is set at 1.525 by auto, and the VDDCR SOC is 1.1375V (see screenshot here). Some users suggest keeping it above 1.4V to avoid issues, but my motherboard automatically set it to 1.4V, which caused a BSOD during a stress test. Without TPU II, my CPU, cache, FPU, and memory handled the test without problems. Since February, I've been running at 4GhZ with TPU II, and I'm unsure if this voltage is safe for long-term use or if it affects CPU lifespan. The highest temperatures I recorded in summer were around 75°C, and current game temps are between 55-65°C. At idle, it's about 33-44°C. My setup includes Windows 10 Pro, a Ryzen 1600X on 4.0 GHz with TPU II, ASUS ROG STRIX B350 motherboard, Gigabyte Windforce GTX950, HyperX Predator RAM, WD 1TB SSD, and an Aerocool VX-750W PSU in a PHANTEKS P400 case.
A
aaron1506
06-07-2017, 05:38 PM #1

Hello, I'm experiencing a problem where Aida reports a "SYSTEM FAILURE" during an FPU stress test. The VDDCR voltage is set at 1.525 by auto, and the VDDCR SOC is 1.1375V (see screenshot here). Some users suggest keeping it above 1.4V to avoid issues, but my motherboard automatically set it to 1.4V, which caused a BSOD during a stress test. Without TPU II, my CPU, cache, FPU, and memory handled the test without problems. Since February, I've been running at 4GhZ with TPU II, and I'm unsure if this voltage is safe for long-term use or if it affects CPU lifespan. The highest temperatures I recorded in summer were around 75°C, and current game temps are between 55-65°C. At idle, it's about 33-44°C. My setup includes Windows 10 Pro, a Ryzen 1600X on 4.0 GHz with TPU II, ASUS ROG STRIX B350 motherboard, Gigabyte Windforce GTX950, HyperX Predator RAM, WD 1TB SSD, and an Aerocool VX-750W PSU in a PHANTEKS P400 case.

C
ComboHax
Member
184
06-07-2017, 09:53 PM
#2
No, it's not performing well near 1.5v and likely unnecessary since the processor would reach its maximum capacity before then. Which cooler are you looking at?
C
ComboHax
06-07-2017, 09:53 PM #2

No, it's not performing well near 1.5v and likely unnecessary since the processor would reach its maximum capacity before then. Which cooler are you looking at?

J
163
06-29-2017, 11:44 AM
#3
CountMike replies that it's not suitable at around 1.5v and the processor would likely reach its maximum before then. He asks which cooler you have.
J
Jazzy_Games123
06-29-2017, 11:44 AM #3

CountMike replies that it's not suitable at around 1.5v and the processor would likely reach its maximum before then. He asks which cooler you have.

S
52
07-01-2017, 10:37 AM
#4
CountMike replied with a clear response, noting the issue isn't close to 1.5v and suggesting the processor would fail before that point. He asked about the cooler choice and shared a screenshot of an AIDA64Extreme. He mentioned VDDCR refers to CPU core voltage, which is equivalent to Vcore for Intel.
S
SirMemeMachine
07-01-2017, 10:37 AM #4

CountMike replied with a clear response, noting the issue isn't close to 1.5v and suggesting the processor would fail before that point. He asked about the cooler choice and shared a screenshot of an AIDA64Extreme. He mentioned VDDCR refers to CPU core voltage, which is equivalent to Vcore for Intel.

X
xDandy
Junior Member
13
07-01-2017, 12:06 PM
#5
VDDCR represents the CPU Core voltage for your system. It matches the Vcore specification for Intel processors.
X
xDandy
07-01-2017, 12:06 PM #5

VDDCR represents the CPU Core voltage for your system. It matches the Vcore specification for Intel processors.

G
Gustavgurra03
Posting Freak
815
07-01-2017, 02:07 PM
#6
VDDCR_CPU and VDDCR_SOC refer to the CPU and Memory Controller voltages. It’s not ideal to rely solely on automatic settings during overclocking; those can spike excessively, especially when adjusting TPU II. The best approach is manual control. I begin by applying a manual voltage of around 1.4v, gradually increasing the multiplier until stability returns. If instability appears, I adjust the LLC and retry. Although it might briefly exceed 1.4v, maintaining stable temperatures keeps it within acceptable limits—typically between 1.416 and 1.425 as AMD recommends.
G
Gustavgurra03
07-01-2017, 02:07 PM #6

VDDCR_CPU and VDDCR_SOC refer to the CPU and Memory Controller voltages. It’s not ideal to rely solely on automatic settings during overclocking; those can spike excessively, especially when adjusting TPU II. The best approach is manual control. I begin by applying a manual voltage of around 1.4v, gradually increasing the multiplier until stability returns. If instability appears, I adjust the LLC and retry. Although it might briefly exceed 1.4v, maintaining stable temperatures keeps it within acceptable limits—typically between 1.416 and 1.425 as AMD recommends.

J
jbak123
Member
65
07-08-2017, 01:10 AM
#7
CountMike provided details about VDDCR_CPU and VDDCR_SOC, mentioning CPU and Memory Controller voltages. He suggested checking HWInfo for accurate Ryzen system information. The HWInfo page linked was https://www.hwinfo.com/download/, and a screenshot showed the VDDCR set to 1.525 V by default with Asus's TPU II preset. In normal 3.6 GHz mode, AIDA64 didn't report a system failure, but only under TPU II, leading him to suspect voltage issues or uncertainty about safe operating voltages for 4.0 GHz mode.
J
jbak123
07-08-2017, 01:10 AM #7

CountMike provided details about VDDCR_CPU and VDDCR_SOC, mentioning CPU and Memory Controller voltages. He suggested checking HWInfo for accurate Ryzen system information. The HWInfo page linked was https://www.hwinfo.com/download/, and a screenshot showed the VDDCR set to 1.525 V by default with Asus's TPU II preset. In normal 3.6 GHz mode, AIDA64 didn't report a system failure, but only under TPU II, leading him to suspect voltage issues or uncertainty about safe operating voltages for 4.0 GHz mode.

C
chris66072
Member
156
07-10-2017, 10:32 AM
#8
Begin HW Info in "Sensors only" mode.
C
chris66072
07-10-2017, 10:32 AM #8

Begin HW Info in "Sensors only" mode.

P
Pauxyneu
Member
138
07-11-2017, 12:32 AM
#9
CountMike shared the details from the link. He mentioned that after entering his BIOS, the RAM LED issue appeared, but tests with memtest64 and AIDA64 didn’t reveal any faults. He wasn’t sure why the indicator was showing up.
P
Pauxyneu
07-11-2017, 12:32 AM #9

CountMike shared the details from the link. He mentioned that after entering his BIOS, the RAM LED issue appeared, but tests with memtest64 and AIDA64 didn’t reveal any faults. He wasn’t sure why the indicator was showing up.

T
T___________T
Member
224
07-18-2017, 09:36 PM
#10
The CPU is receiving 1.5v+, while the core voltage remains comfortably within the normal range. It's hard to figure out why these values differ, as my readings show the core voltage very close to the main reference voltage.
T
T___________T
07-18-2017, 09:36 PM #10

The CPU is receiving 1.5v+, while the core voltage remains comfortably within the normal range. It's hard to figure out why these values differ, as my readings show the core voltage very close to the main reference voltage.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next