F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Is it beneficial to get the K version of the CPU without overclocking?

Is it beneficial to get the K version of the CPU without overclocking?

Is it beneficial to get the K version of the CPU without overclocking?

Z
Zercuador
Member
163
08-06-2020, 10:53 AM
#1
Hi.
I'm planning to get an i7 10700, unsure if the K version is right, and I won't be overclocking it. Thanks.
Z
Zercuador
08-06-2020, 10:53 AM #1

Hi.
I'm planning to get an i7 10700, unsure if the K version is right, and I won't be overclocking it. Thanks.

G
GotApple
Member
79
08-06-2020, 12:27 PM
#2
The K versions frequently match or even undercut non-K options due to competitive pricing strategies. The K models typically provide stronger boosts. Unlike K, they don’t merely overclock; when used together on a Z board, they allow full customization of CPU settings that the non-K units can’t achieve. The K models usually maintain a higher resale value because of strong demand. Unless there’s a specific issue such as incompatibility with third-party BIOS (e.g., Dell, Lenovo, HP), choosing a K is generally advantageous overall.
G
GotApple
08-06-2020, 12:27 PM #2

The K versions frequently match or even undercut non-K options due to competitive pricing strategies. The K models typically provide stronger boosts. Unlike K, they don’t merely overclock; when used together on a Z board, they allow full customization of CPU settings that the non-K units can’t achieve. The K models usually maintain a higher resale value because of strong demand. Unless there’s a specific issue such as incompatibility with third-party BIOS (e.g., Dell, Lenovo, HP), choosing a K is generally advantageous overall.

I
iiSweeTzz
Posting Freak
862
08-06-2020, 02:06 PM
#3
Well, technically yes. Even if you're not OCing the I7-10700k boosts higher(5.1 GHz) compared to the I7-10700(4.8 GHz).
I would get the K version simply because there's the possibility to squeeze even more performance by overclocking (you might consider it in the future).
I
iiSweeTzz
08-06-2020, 02:06 PM #3

Well, technically yes. Even if you're not OCing the I7-10700k boosts higher(5.1 GHz) compared to the I7-10700(4.8 GHz).
I would get the K version simply because there's the possibility to squeeze even more performance by overclocking (you might consider it in the future).

S
squshie1
Junior Member
13
08-06-2020, 06:31 PM
#4
The K versions frequently match or even undercut non-K options due to competitive pricing strategies. The K models typically provide stronger boosts. Unlike K, they don’t merely overclock; when used together on a Z board, they allow full customization of CPU settings that the non-K units can’t achieve. The K models usually maintain a higher resale value because of strong demand. Unless there’s a specific issue such as incompatibility with third-party BIOS (e.g., Dell, Lenovo, HP), choosing a K is generally advantageous overall.
S
squshie1
08-06-2020, 06:31 PM #4

The K versions frequently match or even undercut non-K options due to competitive pricing strategies. The K models typically provide stronger boosts. Unlike K, they don’t merely overclock; when used together on a Z board, they allow full customization of CPU settings that the non-K units can’t achieve. The K models usually maintain a higher resale value because of strong demand. Unless there’s a specific issue such as incompatibility with third-party BIOS (e.g., Dell, Lenovo, HP), choosing a K is generally advantageous overall.

C
Camsell
Member
207
08-06-2020, 07:59 PM
#5
Yes, choosing the “K” version makes sense since it will still provide better performance than a regular CPU, even without overclocking.
C
Camsell
08-06-2020, 07:59 PM #5

Yes, choosing the “K” version makes sense since it will still provide better performance than a regular CPU, even without overclocking.

F
FLPFive
Member
170
08-06-2020, 08:59 PM
#6
You need to include the expense of a good cooler. K chips aren’t included, so add at least another $40 to $50. A Hyper 212 would likely cover this if you’re not overclocking, but not with the latest generations and high voltage/clock speeds from Intel on 14nm.
F
FLPFive
08-06-2020, 08:59 PM #6

You need to include the expense of a good cooler. K chips aren’t included, so add at least another $40 to $50. A Hyper 212 would likely cover this if you’re not overclocking, but not with the latest generations and high voltage/clock speeds from Intel on 14nm.

A
ajpate
Member
223
08-13-2020, 04:08 AM
#7
The K version offers greater boost and a higher base frequency (2.8GHz compared to 3.8GHz on the non-K). This makes it preferable for extended multithreaded tasks. The non-K model also has a lower TDP, which could lead to more aggressive thermal or power management. However, as with any component, research is important to understand its impact on your specific situation. The processor I recently used was an i7-6700, and it matched the i7-6700K closely in performance without needing overclocking.
A
ajpate
08-13-2020, 04:08 AM #7

The K version offers greater boost and a higher base frequency (2.8GHz compared to 3.8GHz on the non-K). This makes it preferable for extended multithreaded tasks. The non-K model also has a lower TDP, which could lead to more aggressive thermal or power management. However, as with any component, research is important to understand its impact on your specific situation. The processor I recently used was an i7-6700, and it matched the i7-6700K closely in performance without needing overclocking.