F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Is ddr3 still worth it?

Is ddr3 still worth it?

Is ddr3 still worth it?

A
AdstaH
Member
76
06-06-2016, 05:37 AM
#1
He has a friend aiming to assemble a rig within a 300 budget. On the second-hand market, you can find older, higher-end boards that support DDR3. At this price point, DDR3 seems like a strong choice. The processor would likely be a 4770K.
A
AdstaH
06-06-2016, 05:37 AM #1

He has a friend aiming to assemble a rig within a 300 budget. On the second-hand market, you can find older, higher-end boards that support DDR3. At this price point, DDR3 seems like a strong choice. The processor would likely be a 4770K.

L
LucyGames_YT
Junior Member
13
06-06-2016, 05:59 AM
#2
The complete setup uses DDR3 RAM, which shouldn’t cause issues as long as the CPU is fast enough. The 4770K remains a solid choice for most games today.
L
LucyGames_YT
06-06-2016, 05:59 AM #2

The complete setup uses DDR3 RAM, which shouldn’t cause issues as long as the CPU is fast enough. The 4770K remains a solid choice for most games today.

_
_ThaKing
Member
58
06-06-2016, 11:47 AM
#3
You're in the USA with a $300 budget. Here are some options:
- 10400F desktop processor from Amazon for $155
- H510 motherboard from Newegg for $73
- 16GB DDR4 RAM from Newegg for $78
These selections pair well with most GPUs and fit within your budget.
_
_ThaKing
06-06-2016, 11:47 AM #3

You're in the USA with a $300 budget. Here are some options:
- 10400F desktop processor from Amazon for $155
- H510 motherboard from Newegg for $73
- 16GB DDR4 RAM from Newegg for $78
These selections pair well with most GPUs and fit within your budget.

G
GoldyGirl
Member
70
06-16-2016, 08:41 PM
#4
The i7 4770K remains a solid choice for gaming even by modern standards. DDR3 continues to offer value, and you can often find them being sold frequently. They provide a decent price of around $50 for 16GB. However, the performance isn't on par with DDR4.
G
GoldyGirl
06-16-2016, 08:41 PM #4

The i7 4770K remains a solid choice for gaming even by modern standards. DDR3 continues to offer value, and you can often find them being sold frequently. They provide a decent price of around $50 for 16GB. However, the performance isn't on par with DDR4.

J
jolo012b
Member
63
06-24-2016, 04:33 PM
#5
It really depends on how you use your PC. Playing moderately, browsing the web, and working in an office should work great with DDR3.
J
jolo012b
06-24-2016, 04:33 PM #5

It really depends on how you use your PC. Playing moderately, browsing the web, and working in an office should work great with DDR3.

N
Noxiusmid
Junior Member
37
06-30-2016, 10:24 AM
#6
I believe having a Haswell/DDR3 setup is okay if you already own it, but I wouldn't invest in upgrading further.
N
Noxiusmid
06-30-2016, 10:24 AM #6

I believe having a Haswell/DDR3 setup is okay if you already own it, but I wouldn't invest in upgrading further.

T
TooFarAway
Member
63
07-07-2016, 12:56 PM
#7
The complete system features an Asus Z87 MAXIMUS VI HERO Intel Core i7-4770K at 3.50GHz (Haswell) with a stock cooler from Kingston, a 240GB SSD, and a Hyperx Fury DDR3 16GB (4x4GB) at 1600MHz GTX 1060. I also have a backup unit from EVGA with 600 watts and W3 connectivity.
T
TooFarAway
07-07-2016, 12:56 PM #7

The complete system features an Asus Z87 MAXIMUS VI HERO Intel Core i7-4770K at 3.50GHz (Haswell) with a stock cooler from Kingston, a 240GB SSD, and a Hyperx Fury DDR3 16GB (4x4GB) at 1600MHz GTX 1060. I also have a backup unit from EVGA with 600 watts and W3 connectivity.

S
Starbomber26
Junior Member
14
07-07-2016, 06:15 PM
#8
In my experience, DDR3 offers the same price as DDR4 when you can locate it. It shouldn't matter whether it's still viable by today's standards—it's about the reasons to keep sticking with an older standard instead of choosing better options. You could easily upgrade your motherboard, CPU, and RAM for around $250 and invest in newer specs. My view: No, DDR3 isn't worth it anymore. Those who argue otherwise are overlooking the point.
S
Starbomber26
07-07-2016, 06:15 PM #8

In my experience, DDR3 offers the same price as DDR4 when you can locate it. It shouldn't matter whether it's still viable by today's standards—it's about the reasons to keep sticking with an older standard instead of choosing better options. You could easily upgrade your motherboard, CPU, and RAM for around $250 and invest in newer specs. My view: No, DDR3 isn't worth it anymore. Those who argue otherwise are overlooking the point.

R
rcik2004
Member
53
07-07-2016, 06:59 PM
#9
I’ve worked with this setup for several years before switching to a newer Ryzen model. The previous rig was essentially a 4770 non-K with identical clock speeds between the 1280V3 and 4770, a GTX 980 GPU, 32GB DDR3 memory, an H97 board, SATA SSD, and additional drives for extra space. It handled 1080P60 gaming smoothly—Minecraft with many mods, Sniper Elite 4, Mudrunner, Borderlands 2, etc.—all ran well. 40 to 60 FPS was comfortable, and I was quite satisfied.

Once I upgraded to a 1440P144 monitor, performance dropped drastically. Games would struggle at 30 FPS or less, and titles like Borderlands 3 and Cyberpunk would crash under the load. My conclusion was that the older configuration was solid for 1080P60 but became unreliable beyond that resolution, especially with higher refresh rates or lower latency systems.

Now that it’s mostly a server setup, I still keep the Xeon, but if I needed a dedicated gaming panel, I’d switch to a better 1080P60 display instead.
R
rcik2004
07-07-2016, 06:59 PM #9

I’ve worked with this setup for several years before switching to a newer Ryzen model. The previous rig was essentially a 4770 non-K with identical clock speeds between the 1280V3 and 4770, a GTX 980 GPU, 32GB DDR3 memory, an H97 board, SATA SSD, and additional drives for extra space. It handled 1080P60 gaming smoothly—Minecraft with many mods, Sniper Elite 4, Mudrunner, Borderlands 2, etc.—all ran well. 40 to 60 FPS was comfortable, and I was quite satisfied.

Once I upgraded to a 1440P144 monitor, performance dropped drastically. Games would struggle at 30 FPS or less, and titles like Borderlands 3 and Cyberpunk would crash under the load. My conclusion was that the older configuration was solid for 1080P60 but became unreliable beyond that resolution, especially with higher refresh rates or lower latency systems.

Now that it’s mostly a server setup, I still keep the Xeon, but if I needed a dedicated gaming panel, I’d switch to a better 1080P60 display instead.