F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Intel i7 6700k OC Disgrace

Intel i7 6700k OC Disgrace

Intel i7 6700k OC Disgrace

S
satchmoto
Junior Member
10
01-09-2016, 07:17 PM
#1
Since I installed my new PC a few months back, I've struggled to achieve a solid overclock on the CPU. Despite many attempts and watching plenty of tutorials, nothing has worked. Even when I set the manual Vcore to 1.25 with a target of 1.4ghz, it fails. Windows crashes during startup, displaying errors like "IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL_TO." I've experimented with the bus and the block, but no success has been reached. Currently, my CPU runs at 1.296v and 4.343ghz, which is far below expectations—reaching 4.5ghz would be ideal. I'm considering giving up on the rest of the PC specifications.
S
satchmoto
01-09-2016, 07:17 PM #1

Since I installed my new PC a few months back, I've struggled to achieve a solid overclock on the CPU. Despite many attempts and watching plenty of tutorials, nothing has worked. Even when I set the manual Vcore to 1.25 with a target of 1.4ghz, it fails. Windows crashes during startup, displaying errors like "IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL_TO." I've experimented with the bus and the block, but no success has been reached. Currently, my CPU runs at 1.296v and 4.343ghz, which is far below expectations—reaching 4.5ghz would be ideal. I'm considering giving up on the rest of the PC specifications.

M
MooMoo2011
Senior Member
690
01-09-2016, 10:50 PM
#2
It seems unusual for us seasoned folks, but Intel's latest .14nm technology can actually support greater voltages compared to the previous .22nm design. You might be able to reach up to 1.4V safely. This could be the breakthrough you're looking for.
M
MooMoo2011
01-09-2016, 10:50 PM #2

It seems unusual for us seasoned folks, but Intel's latest .14nm technology can actually support greater voltages compared to the previous .22nm design. You might be able to reach up to 1.4V safely. This could be the breakthrough you're looking for.

U
UberSon
Junior Member
2
01-11-2016, 11:37 PM
#3
Is your overclocking using the multiplier or the base block?
U
UberSon
01-11-2016, 11:37 PM #3

Is your overclocking using the multiplier or the base block?

T
165
01-12-2016, 01:20 AM
#4
Every CPU is unique. Some perform better when overclocked than others. Depending on your setup, you could attempt overclocking with 8 or 16 GB of RAM, adjusting timings and raising the DRAM voltage. A configuration of 32 GB with all slots active can strain the memory controller.
T
TechSoldierEx2
01-12-2016, 01:20 AM #4

Every CPU is unique. Some perform better when overclocked than others. Depending on your setup, you could attempt overclocking with 8 or 16 GB of RAM, adjusting timings and raising the DRAM voltage. A configuration of 32 GB with all slots active can strain the memory controller.

M
Milan1208
Member
103
02-01-2016, 02:44 PM
#5
but why would you do that? i already have an msi motherboard and overclocking to 4.4ghz was just me toggling oc mode. i don't believe the additional 1 ghz is really worthwhile.
M
Milan1208
02-01-2016, 02:44 PM #5

but why would you do that? i already have an msi motherboard and overclocking to 4.4ghz was just me toggling oc mode. i don't believe the additional 1 ghz is really worthwhile.

G
Goku_Jerome
Senior Member
428
02-05-2016, 08:08 AM
#6
The only factor I notice is the excessive amount of RAM, particularly if it exceeds 2,666 MHz. Very high RAM speeds combined with fully filled slots at maximum capacities can cause significant issues. Interestingly, I've observed (though rarely) individuals achieving better performance with lower than stock clock speeds when using such high-speed RAM.
G
Goku_Jerome
02-05-2016, 08:08 AM #6

The only factor I notice is the excessive amount of RAM, particularly if it exceeds 2,666 MHz. Very high RAM speeds combined with fully filled slots at maximum capacities can cause significant issues. Interestingly, I've observed (though rarely) individuals achieving better performance with lower than stock clock speeds when using such high-speed RAM.

M
moo06
Member
64
02-12-2016, 07:41 PM
#7
Thanks for the updates.
@MrLehi99 I'm using Corsair Dominator Platinums (4x8) 32gb 2133 Mhz.
@Ecky I've experimented with both, tried setting the multiplier to 43 and the bus to 103, but haven't tried anything like a 20 multiplier with a 200 base.
@Damagerpersec I attempted the OC mode available on my motherboard, though it raises the voltage too high, around 1.45v, which isn't ideal for CPU health.
M
moo06
02-12-2016, 07:41 PM #7

Thanks for the updates.
@MrLehi99 I'm using Corsair Dominator Platinums (4x8) 32gb 2133 Mhz.
@Ecky I've experimented with both, tried setting the multiplier to 43 and the bus to 103, but haven't tried anything like a 20 multiplier with a 200 base.
@Damagerpersec I attempted the OC mode available on my motherboard, though it raises the voltage too high, around 1.45v, which isn't ideal for CPU health.

K
Koalacat101
Member
139
02-12-2016, 08:48 PM
#8
It seems unusual for us seasoned folks, but Intel's latest .14nm technology can actually support greater voltages compared to the previous .22nm design. You might be able to reach up to 1.4V safely. This could be the breakthrough you're looking for.
K
Koalacat101
02-12-2016, 08:48 PM #8

It seems unusual for us seasoned folks, but Intel's latest .14nm technology can actually support greater voltages compared to the previous .22nm design. You might be able to reach up to 1.4V safely. This could be the breakthrough you're looking for.