F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Inquiries regarding vintage SD cards

Inquiries regarding vintage SD cards

Inquiries regarding vintage SD cards

A
angel856
Junior Member
34
12-01-2016, 07:32 AM
#1
Hi, your Pentium PC is from the late '90s or early 2000s. You found it five years ago and it still works perfectly. The motherboard you have (GA-6VA+) supports up to 512MB memory modules, so it can definitely handle a 512MB SD card. The fact that you have two 16MB RAM sticks means you can install more than one stick if needed. Regarding the 3 RAM slots, each slot typically supports up to 1GB of RAM, so three slots together can accommodate around 3GB total. That’s more than enough for your current setup. You’re all set with this machine!
A
angel856
12-01-2016, 07:32 AM #1

Hi, your Pentium PC is from the late '90s or early 2000s. You found it five years ago and it still works perfectly. The motherboard you have (GA-6VA+) supports up to 512MB memory modules, so it can definitely handle a 512MB SD card. The fact that you have two 16MB RAM sticks means you can install more than one stick if needed. Regarding the 3 RAM slots, each slot typically supports up to 1GB of RAM, so three slots together can accommodate around 3GB total. That’s more than enough for your current setup. You’re all set with this machine!

B
Bl4sTeD
Member
172
12-04-2016, 02:29 AM
#2
The motherboard needs to accommodate the PC133 DIMM. Later in the document it mentions it can hold up to 1.5 GB of RAM. Running Windows 98 will require some adjustments if you have more than 512 MB of memory installed. The built-in support isn’t ideal for that configuration.
B
Bl4sTeD
12-04-2016, 02:29 AM #2

The motherboard needs to accommodate the PC133 DIMM. Later in the document it mentions it can hold up to 1.5 GB of RAM. Running Windows 98 will require some adjustments if you have more than 512 MB of memory installed. The built-in support isn’t ideal for that configuration.

K
KilleurMiino
Member
166
12-04-2016, 09:10 AM
#3
You didn’t notice the top of the screen when using Windows 98—what should you try next? Also, could varying SD cards affect performance? Both PC133 and other modules might play a role.
K
KilleurMiino
12-04-2016, 09:10 AM #3

You didn’t notice the top of the screen when using Windows 98—what should you try next? Also, could varying SD cards affect performance? Both PC133 and other modules might play a role.

Z
Zv_Mur2Brick
Member
63
12-11-2016, 09:35 AM
#4
The motherboard accommodates up to three SDRAM modules, with a maximum capacity of 512 MB. However, the reference to "256 Mbit" suggests it likely only supports sticks using chips up to 256 MB or 32 MB in size. Therefore, your 512 MB modules would need to be composed of smaller units—possibly 16 individual 32 MB chips—to fit. The image shows a stick made from eight 64 MB chips, which totals 512 MB, but only one side appears populated. This uncertainty means compatibility isn't guaranteed. For Windows 98 SE, it's advisable to use sticks of 256 MB or less, as larger configurations may cause problems. See the linked resources for solutions and updates: https://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#98SE. Also noted in the documentation that the Apollo Pro 133 chipset imposes this limitation, as confirmed in the datasheet (pages 9-10).
Z
Zv_Mur2Brick
12-11-2016, 09:35 AM #4

The motherboard accommodates up to three SDRAM modules, with a maximum capacity of 512 MB. However, the reference to "256 Mbit" suggests it likely only supports sticks using chips up to 256 MB or 32 MB in size. Therefore, your 512 MB modules would need to be composed of smaller units—possibly 16 individual 32 MB chips—to fit. The image shows a stick made from eight 64 MB chips, which totals 512 MB, but only one side appears populated. This uncertainty means compatibility isn't guaranteed. For Windows 98 SE, it's advisable to use sticks of 256 MB or less, as larger configurations may cause problems. See the linked resources for solutions and updates: https://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#98SE. Also noted in the documentation that the Apollo Pro 133 chipset imposes this limitation, as confirmed in the datasheet (pages 9-10).

T
taco2006
Member
203
12-12-2016, 12:20 PM
#5
I verified once more and noticed the module contains chips on both sides, so it should be fine. Additionally, the item is listed on my country's version of eBay, with a datasheet indicating 8x32m chips totaling 256MB—confusing. Based on your comments, the first one should suffice for me. Thanks.
T
taco2006
12-12-2016, 12:20 PM #5

I verified once more and noticed the module contains chips on both sides, so it should be fine. Additionally, the item is listed on my country's version of eBay, with a datasheet indicating 8x32m chips totaling 256MB—confusing. Based on your comments, the first one should suffice for me. Thanks.

S
SIutBanger
Junior Member
10
12-15-2016, 07:21 PM
#6
32Mx8 connectors delivering 32 MB using an 8-bit bus or interface. This setup requires eight chips arranged in a bank to form a 64-bit wide memory block. You can employ two banks, with each bank containing eight chips for greater capacity. A 16EA configuration indicates sixteen chips on the memory strip. The layout above shows two rows labeled 64M x 72 and another row of nine chips designated for ECC SDRAM, with an additional chip dedicated to error correction data.
S
SIutBanger
12-15-2016, 07:21 PM #6

32Mx8 connectors delivering 32 MB using an 8-bit bus or interface. This setup requires eight chips arranged in a bank to form a 64-bit wide memory block. You can employ two banks, with each bank containing eight chips for greater capacity. A 16EA configuration indicates sixteen chips on the memory strip. The layout above shows two rows labeled 64M x 72 and another row of nine chips designated for ECC SDRAM, with an additional chip dedicated to error correction data.

B
buckeyes2013
Junior Member
7
12-20-2016, 12:09 AM
#7
Uses Windows 2000, rooted in Windows NT, significantly superior to 98.
B
buckeyes2013
12-20-2016, 12:09 AM #7

Uses Windows 2000, rooted in Windows NT, significantly superior to 98.