F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Initial adjustments to RAM timing boost performance speed

Initial adjustments to RAM timing boost performance speed

Initial adjustments to RAM timing boost performance speed

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
R
Ramzarn
Junior Member
36
03-31-2021, 09:17 PM
#11
The sequence 16-16-16-36 is likely better than 16-19-14-35 for your request.
R
Ramzarn
03-31-2021, 09:17 PM #11

The sequence 16-16-16-36 is likely better than 16-19-14-35 for your request.

V
Viveka570
Junior Member
38
03-31-2021, 10:29 PM
#12
That’s likely what you intended to convey, including the details about timing and consistency.
V
Viveka570
03-31-2021, 10:29 PM #12

That’s likely what you intended to convey, including the details about timing and consistency.

I
iTzDuco1
Member
69
04-01-2021, 07:01 AM
#13
You're looking for board options to fine-tune timing settings. Brands like Asrock and Asus are known for their automatic optimization of secondary and tertiary timings during the boot process.
I
iTzDuco1
04-01-2021, 07:01 AM #13

You're looking for board options to fine-tune timing settings. Brands like Asrock and Asus are known for their automatic optimization of secondary and tertiary timings during the boot process.

T
Thunder_28
Junior Member
18
04-05-2021, 02:02 AM
#14
MSI brand versus Asus brand = gigabyte featuring manual dual BIOS management > Asrock >>>> gigabyte lacking dual BIOS control memory training is performed on every board
T
Thunder_28
04-05-2021, 02:02 AM #14

MSI brand versus Asus brand = gigabyte featuring manual dual BIOS management > Asrock >>>> gigabyte lacking dual BIOS control memory training is performed on every board

X
Xytrixz
Senior Member
552
04-05-2021, 07:20 AM
#15
MSI was introduced mainly for this purpose. Most users are unsure about its original reason. Many forums also mention past issues with some Gigabyte boards having unstable secondary timings, which required adjustments for optimal performance.
X
Xytrixz
04-05-2021, 07:20 AM #15

MSI was introduced mainly for this purpose. Most users are unsure about its original reason. Many forums also mention past issues with some Gigabyte boards having unstable secondary timings, which required adjustments for optimal performance.

J
joeis2013
Junior Member
21
04-05-2021, 08:34 AM
#16
The best approach with a 16-16-16 kit is to lower the voltage below 1.5V, provide direct airflow, and test 14-16-16 first. If that works, try 14-14-14 (unlikely to boot) or adjust closer to 3800 if stable. Once those are confirmed, focus on secondary timings. TFRA 240-320 TFW at 24 or 28 is the primary option. Consider using a Ryzen RAM calculator for guidance.
J
joeis2013
04-05-2021, 08:34 AM #16

The best approach with a 16-16-16 kit is to lower the voltage below 1.5V, provide direct airflow, and test 14-16-16 first. If that works, try 14-14-14 (unlikely to boot) or adjust closer to 3800 if stable. Once those are confirmed, focus on secondary timings. TFRA 240-320 TFW at 24 or 28 is the primary option. Consider using a Ryzen RAM calculator for guidance.

1
101PINGO
Member
154
04-05-2021, 08:39 AM
#17
Great! I'll give it a shot!
1
101PINGO
04-05-2021, 08:39 AM #17

Great! I'll give it a shot!

M
Mr_pigy_leg
Junior Member
14
04-09-2021, 09:11 PM
#18
Their boards always performed better than other brands. After you start adjusting them manually, the stock settings become less important.
M
Mr_pigy_leg
04-09-2021, 09:11 PM #18

Their boards always performed better than other brands. After you start adjusting them manually, the stock settings become less important.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2