F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Increasing cores while keeping power constant can still be efficient.

Increasing cores while keeping power constant can still be efficient.

Increasing cores while keeping power constant can still be efficient.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
N
NinjaaGamer_
Member
189
09-30-2023, 02:18 AM
#1
Hi, your 13600k draws 220W and peaks at 98°C on the hottest core. Switching to a 14900k would likely allow better heat spreading, potentially supporting higher power without needing more cooling capacity.
N
NinjaaGamer_
09-30-2023, 02:18 AM #1

Hi, your 13600k draws 220W and peaks at 98°C on the hottest core. Switching to a 14900k would likely allow better heat spreading, potentially supporting higher power without needing more cooling capacity.

S
SkyyWolfie
Member
66
10-05-2023, 10:52 AM
#2
Even with additional cores, they share the same die size, which means the 14900k could become hotter or throttle sooner than the 13600k. It will also draw more power compared to the 13600k.
S
SkyyWolfie
10-05-2023, 10:52 AM #2

Even with additional cores, they share the same die size, which means the 14900k could become hotter or throttle sooner than the 13600k. It will also draw more power compared to the 13600k.

X
xanderzone317
Posting Freak
957
10-06-2023, 06:05 PM
#3
You'd need to configure pl1/2 at 200 watts.
X
xanderzone317
10-06-2023, 06:05 PM #3

You'd need to configure pl1/2 at 200 watts.

A
Arlone_HS
Junior Member
17
10-08-2023, 07:29 AM
#4
What adjustments should we make? Raise the fan speed? Use a larger cooler? Which one are you using now?
A
Arlone_HS
10-08-2023, 07:29 AM #4

What adjustments should we make? Raise the fan speed? Use a larger cooler? Which one are you using now?

E
edjea
Junior Member
45
10-25-2023, 10:44 PM
#5
My 240 model doesn’t fit any larger size.
E
edjea
10-25-2023, 10:44 PM #5

My 240 model doesn’t fit any larger size.

L
lilycotterill
Senior Member
656
10-26-2023, 05:20 PM
#6
It’s not only the overall wattage that counts, but how it’s allocated. On a chip such as the 13600K, much of the workload ends up on fewer processors, creating intense areas that reach 95-98°C even with modest total power. With the 14900K, the same 220 W is distributed across additional cores and more silicon space, allowing each core to operate cooler under the same load. Still, the package must still release all 220 W, so your cooling solution remains critical. In essence, more cores spread the heat more evenly, reducing localized spikes. Identical power equals similar cooling needs. If you exceed 220 W on the 14900K, temperatures will rise again unless your cooler is upgraded.
L
lilycotterill
10-26-2023, 05:20 PM #6

It’s not only the overall wattage that counts, but how it’s allocated. On a chip such as the 13600K, much of the workload ends up on fewer processors, creating intense areas that reach 95-98°C even with modest total power. With the 14900K, the same 220 W is distributed across additional cores and more silicon space, allowing each core to operate cooler under the same load. Still, the package must still release all 220 W, so your cooling solution remains critical. In essence, more cores spread the heat more evenly, reducing localized spikes. Identical power equals similar cooling needs. If you exceed 220 W on the 14900K, temperatures will rise again unless your cooler is upgraded.

D
dniznemac
Senior Member
555
10-26-2023, 11:53 PM
#7
Looking into the specs, I’m curious about running the default 253W cooler on a 14900K. If it handles heat better without throttling, with the tweaks you mentioned—57P core boost, 4.4E cores, 50MV undervolt, and a 200W cap—I think I’d be fine. The temps could stay manageable, especially since the liquid temps can go up to 36°C at 220W. Just want to confirm if the cooler will keep up with the load.
D
dniznemac
10-26-2023, 11:53 PM #7

Looking into the specs, I’m curious about running the default 253W cooler on a 14900K. If it handles heat better without throttling, with the tweaks you mentioned—57P core boost, 4.4E cores, 50MV undervolt, and a 200W cap—I think I’d be fine. The temps could stay manageable, especially since the liquid temps can go up to 36°C at 220W. Just want to confirm if the cooler will keep up with the load.

R
RainbowFish5
Member
122
11-02-2023, 09:42 PM
#8
Additional processing units are beneficial. Increased silicon footprint is not. Both maintain the same 257mm 2 die configuration.
R
RainbowFish5
11-02-2023, 09:42 PM #8

Additional processing units are beneficial. Increased silicon footprint is not. Both maintain the same 257mm 2 die configuration.

P
PainfulFist
Member
151
11-06-2023, 12:30 PM
#9
The increased heat distribution across more cores reduces the risk of hotspots, so a 14900K won’t instantly hit a few cores at 98C like a 13600K would. Still, the end result is that your cooler must manage around 220–250 W. If it’s already near the 220 W mark, moving to the stock 253 W limit will likely cause it to exceed capacity unless you adjust voltage or restrict power. Your plan for a modest undervolt with a 200 W limit sounds reasonable for gaming, as most titles don’t run all cores simultaneously. This approach helps prevent throttling while maintaining good performance.
P
PainfulFist
11-06-2023, 12:30 PM #9

The increased heat distribution across more cores reduces the risk of hotspots, so a 14900K won’t instantly hit a few cores at 98C like a 13600K would. Still, the end result is that your cooler must manage around 220–250 W. If it’s already near the 220 W mark, moving to the stock 253 W limit will likely cause it to exceed capacity unless you adjust voltage or restrict power. Your plan for a modest undervolt with a 200 W limit sounds reasonable for gaming, as most titles don’t run all cores simultaneously. This approach helps prevent throttling while maintaining good performance.

T
TwiceCritical
Member
110
11-07-2023, 05:29 AM
#10
The die size is actually getting larger.
T
TwiceCritical
11-07-2023, 05:29 AM #10

The die size is actually getting larger.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next