F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming I’m looking for advice on improving the performance of my computer.

I’m looking for advice on improving the performance of my computer.

I’m looking for advice on improving the performance of my computer.

I
IceCraftGaming
Junior Member
7
07-01-2016, 05:08 AM
#1
Here are my UserBenchmark scores: Gaming 34%, Desktop 65%, Work 43%.
Processor: Intel Core i7-6700 - 72.1%
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti - 30.5%
Solid State Drive: WD Blue 250GB - 73.7%
Hard Disk Drive: WD Blue 1TB (2012) - 84.1%
Memory: Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB - 28.1%
Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Games are generally running smoothly, but the system is being reported as underperforming. Could this be due to its age? Perhaps a less powerful 1050 version? Or could it be related to the drivers? What are your opinions on this?
I
IceCraftGaming
07-01-2016, 05:08 AM #1

Here are my UserBenchmark scores: Gaming 34%, Desktop 65%, Work 43%.
Processor: Intel Core i7-6700 - 72.1%
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti - 30.5%
Solid State Drive: WD Blue 250GB - 73.7%
Hard Disk Drive: WD Blue 1TB (2012) - 84.1%
Memory: Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB - 28.1%
Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Games are generally running smoothly, but the system is being reported as underperforming. Could this be due to its age? Perhaps a less powerful 1050 version? Or could it be related to the drivers? What are your opinions on this?

M
MaliciousWolf
Member
228
07-01-2016, 09:22 AM
#2
The USAFRet account has expressed skepticism regarding UserBenchmark’s assessments. They advise against relying heavily on this tool due to its unusual reporting methods. Specifically, the system is suggesting your memory capacity is inadequate—just 1x8GB—despite acknowledging that a configuration of 2x4GB might offer some improvement. However, UserBenchmark indicates that the RAM and GPU are the primary factors contributing to performance issues. Please disregard these recommendations from UserBenchmark, and instead, provide details about your actual gaming and application performance.
M
MaliciousWolf
07-01-2016, 09:22 AM #2

The USAFRet account has expressed skepticism regarding UserBenchmark’s assessments. They advise against relying heavily on this tool due to its unusual reporting methods. Specifically, the system is suggesting your memory capacity is inadequate—just 1x8GB—despite acknowledging that a configuration of 2x4GB might offer some improvement. However, UserBenchmark indicates that the RAM and GPU are the primary factors contributing to performance issues. Please disregard these recommendations from UserBenchmark, and instead, provide details about your actual gaming and application performance.

Y
yorick1223
Junior Member
25
07-01-2016, 10:56 PM
#3
Ignore Userbenchmark’s results – they are notably strange. What tangible performance do you experience with the games and applications you regularly employ? It suggests your memory is inadequate, primarily due to having only 1x8GB, and that upgrading to 2x4GB could provide a slight improvement.
Y
yorick1223
07-01-2016, 10:56 PM #3

Ignore Userbenchmark’s results – they are notably strange. What tangible performance do you experience with the games and applications you regularly employ? It suggests your memory is inadequate, primarily due to having only 1x8GB, and that upgrading to 2x4GB could provide a slight improvement.

H
Heart_Queen
Junior Member
45
07-09-2016, 12:19 AM
#4
Regarding enhancements for gaming experiences:

1. Increased memory capacity, ideally 16 gigabytes or more.
2. An upgraded graphics card; a mid-range option costing around $250 would be suitable for those on a tighter budget.
H
Heart_Queen
07-09-2016, 12:19 AM #4

Regarding enhancements for gaming experiences:

1. Increased memory capacity, ideally 16 gigabytes or more.
2. An upgraded graphics card; a mid-range option costing around $250 would be suitable for those on a tighter budget.

G
Gorofex
Junior Member
27
07-09-2016, 04:32 AM
#5
Regarding enhancements for gaming experiences:

1. Increased memory capacity, ideally 16 gigabytes or more.
2. An upgraded graphics card would be beneficial; a mid-range option costing under $250 could be suitable for those with limited budgets. Is the GTX 1050 Ti considered a reasonably effective choice for playing games?
G
Gorofex
07-09-2016, 04:32 AM #5

Regarding enhancements for gaming experiences:

1. Increased memory capacity, ideally 16 gigabytes or more.
2. An upgraded graphics card would be beneficial; a mid-range option costing under $250 could be suitable for those with limited budgets. Is the GTX 1050 Ti considered a reasonably effective choice for playing games?

M
ManTheMonkey
Member
222
07-14-2016, 02:20 AM
#6
Former USAF:
Don't rely heavily on UserBenchmark. The results seem unusual.
What real-world performance are you experiencing with the games and tasks you regularly use?
It suggests your memory capacity is inadequate, primarily because you're using 8GB of RAM in a single stick. Running with two 4GB sticks might yield slightly improved results.
UserBenchmark indicates that your memory and graphics card are the primary limitations, not your RAM.
M
ManTheMonkey
07-14-2016, 02:20 AM #6

Former USAF:
Don't rely heavily on UserBenchmark. The results seem unusual.
What real-world performance are you experiencing with the games and tasks you regularly use?
It suggests your memory capacity is inadequate, primarily because you're using 8GB of RAM in a single stick. Running with two 4GB sticks might yield slightly improved results.
UserBenchmark indicates that your memory and graphics card are the primary limitations, not your RAM.

P
PersieO
Posting Freak
786
07-14-2016, 10:34 PM
#7
The USAFRet account is using an iMac. Userbenchmark’s results are unreliable and should not be trusted. Instead, let's concentrate on your real-world performance with the games and applications you regularly use.

The system is suggesting that your memory capacity is inadequate, likely because you're utilizing only one 8GB stick – a dual set of two 4GB sticks would probably improve things slightly. Userbenchmark indicates that your memory and graphics card are the primary limitations, not the RAM itself.

Based on your initial statement: “RAM: Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB - 28.1%”.

Please, disregard the Userbenchmark assessment and provide details about your actual performance levels.
P
PersieO
07-14-2016, 10:34 PM #7

The USAFRet account is using an iMac. Userbenchmark’s results are unreliable and should not be trusted. Instead, let's concentrate on your real-world performance with the games and applications you regularly use.

The system is suggesting that your memory capacity is inadequate, likely because you're utilizing only one 8GB stick – a dual set of two 4GB sticks would probably improve things slightly. Userbenchmark indicates that your memory and graphics card are the primary limitations, not the RAM itself.

Based on your initial statement: “RAM: Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB - 28.1%”.

Please, disregard the Userbenchmark assessment and provide details about your actual performance levels.

L
L3gnd_Ex
Junior Member
13
07-15-2016, 01:24 AM
#8
USAFRet :
imac77asdf :
USAFRet :
Don't rely heavily on userbenchmark’s results—the data is oddly inconsistent.
Could you describe the actual speed you're experiencing when playing games and handling your typical applications?
It indicates a problem with your memory, suggesting that running only one 8GB stick would be beneficial. Two 4GB sticks might improve things slightly.
However, userbenchmark suggests your RAM is adequate and that your graphics card and system status are the main bottlenecks.
Based on your initial post: “RAM: Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB - 28.1%”
Please disregard userbenchmark’s assessment.
What real-world performance are you observing?
Where can I see the data you're referencing?
L
L3gnd_Ex
07-15-2016, 01:24 AM #8

USAFRet :
imac77asdf :
USAFRet :
Don't rely heavily on userbenchmark’s results—the data is oddly inconsistent.
Could you describe the actual speed you're experiencing when playing games and handling your typical applications?
It indicates a problem with your memory, suggesting that running only one 8GB stick would be beneficial. Two 4GB sticks might improve things slightly.
However, userbenchmark suggests your RAM is adequate and that your graphics card and system status are the main bottlenecks.
Based on your initial post: “RAM: Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB - 28.1%”
Please disregard userbenchmark’s assessment.
What real-world performance are you observing?
Where can I see the data you're referencing?

M
miknes123
Senior Member
646
07-15-2016, 02:59 AM
#9
Where can I locate the speed you're referencing?
Is this system meeting your anticipated results regarding its use – specifically for gaming frame rates, video production, or image manipulation?
M
miknes123
07-15-2016, 02:59 AM #9

Where can I locate the speed you're referencing?
Is this system meeting your anticipated results regarding its use – specifically for gaming frame rates, video production, or image manipulation?