I'm in a debate with someone on the forum who isn't familiar with the topic.
I'm in a debate with someone on the forum who isn't familiar with the topic.
According to Guru3d, a 3960X resolution at 1080P would only add a few extra frames. From our end, we're confident about this.
BTW, that chart comes from www.techgage.com. The specific page is: http://techgage.com/article/amd-radeon-r...ti-review/. I discovered it by right-clicking the image in Chrome, selecting "Search Google Images for this Image," and looking for 290X and 780 Ti versions. The reviewer seems to have made a mistake somewhere—like expecting higher FPS at 5760x1080 compared to 2560x1440. Even when lowering the settings from Ultra to High, it didn’t help much.
I shared two clips featuring a 780 TI on Ultra, making it effortlessly smooth at 100-120 fps
100-120fps refers to a range, not just one value. It means the frame rate stays between 100 and 120 frames per second, distinguishing it from the average or minimum rates.
Hey there, sorry for the confusion. Check out the original post here:
You consistently achieve high FPS when facing away from the map center. Directing your gaze toward the center drops below 100 FPS. The discrepancy in my and your graphs isn't due to actual performance—it's because they represent averages. You won't see a steady 120 FPS on the 780Ti with maximum settings unless you reduce resolution below 1080p or shift your focus away from the center.
What is this term? Are you asking about the concept of center?