I'm basically as ethical as pirates without being one.
I'm basically as ethical as pirates without being one.
I own all my Xbox 360 and PS3 gear. Second-hand, I refurbish machines I find affordable and keep them. The software is also second-hand. No money going to companies? Morals? I used to think I had strong ones, but apparently they’re personal. All my hardware comes from eBay.
Refurbishing used items isn't comparable to what pirates did. It’s actually beneficial—it cuts down on waste and gives value to things people no longer need. Pirates took usable goods from those who still wanted them, like money or spices. Of course, proving quality can be tricky, but that doesn’t change the fact it’s a positive approach.
I believe reducing piracy to such a simple perspective misses important details.
From the perspective of the maker, not the buyer. The buyer suffers a loss in any case—especially if they’re caught copying or being scammed. It’s good that things stay relatively gentle.
Isn't that right? Since Microsoft no longer sells Xbox 360 consoles, they likely don’t profit from used or refurbished hardware sales. They might push you to buy a new one for a product you already own, but if their devices are built to become obsolete quickly and lack warranty support, buyers may hesitate.
I never covered the full price and another person receives the product without paying the company. Piracy exists solely for financial benefit to creators. Switcharoo, I now have an XBOX One X, or PS4 Pro, or I managed to obtain a functional pre-retail PS5 for significantly less than its retail price.
HD re-makes exist to generate income once the original hardware stops being sold. Backwards compatibility played a key role for Sony in this strategy.