F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Identify what's slowing down your progress in Cities: Skylines.

Identify what's slowing down your progress in Cities: Skylines.

Identify what's slowing down your progress in Cities: Skylines.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
S
SrSniper28
Member
231
04-11-2021, 08:32 AM
#11
Consider this with a cautious perspective since my approach isn’t perfect. - game settings fully enabled - VSync turned off - adjusted CPU affinity in Task Manager - recorded GPU usage I observed is that Skylands consumes a massive amount of VRAM when pushed to full capacity, I’ll run some tests on it and share the findings later.
S
SrSniper28
04-11-2021, 08:32 AM #11

Consider this with a cautious perspective since my approach isn’t perfect. - game settings fully enabled - VSync turned off - adjusted CPU affinity in Task Manager - recorded GPU usage I observed is that Skylands consumes a massive amount of VRAM when pushed to full capacity, I’ll run some tests on it and share the findings later.

A
augustb19907
Senior Member
456
04-11-2021, 08:41 AM
#12
Consider using a refurbished i5 or i7 within the 2000–4000 series range. Perfect for keeping costs low while matching his gaming preferences.
A
augustb19907
04-11-2021, 08:41 AM #12

Consider using a refurbished i5 or i7 within the 2000–4000 series range. Perfect for keeping costs low while matching his gaming preferences.

L
Lherion
Member
182
04-12-2021, 09:57 PM
#13
With settings kept simple, it doesn’t affect VRAM much. After more tests, the GPU usage stays similar for both 2C+HT and 4C+HT. That gives a good idea about overall core performance.
L
Lherion
04-12-2021, 09:57 PM #13

With settings kept simple, it doesn’t affect VRAM much. After more tests, the GPU usage stays similar for both 2C+HT and 4C+HT. That gives a good idea about overall core performance.

F
FoxayFella
Member
163
04-13-2021, 05:02 AM
#14
My test results show usage never exceeded 3 GB. Regarding the GTX 970 issue, it seems the 3.5 GB VRAM was a general reference, not limited to third-party boards. Your Strix model likely has 3.5 GB or 4 GB of VRAM.
F
FoxayFella
04-13-2021, 05:02 AM #14

My test results show usage never exceeded 3 GB. Regarding the GTX 970 issue, it seems the 3.5 GB VRAM was a general reference, not limited to third-party boards. Your Strix model likely has 3.5 GB or 4 GB of VRAM.

D
djpumuslink01
Senior Member
577
04-13-2021, 05:18 AM
#15
the situation is greatly exaggerated. every component has 4GB of VRAM, the final 512MB operates at a significantly slower rate. i still think nvidia's internal misunderstanding stems from their marketing approach—if they truly intended to deceive enthusiasts, they’d have chosen a more accurate name instead of spreading misleading data that doesn’t really matter. (as jayztwocents put it: "the benchmarks remain valid, nothing has changed")
D
djpumuslink01
04-13-2021, 05:18 AM #15

the situation is greatly exaggerated. every component has 4GB of VRAM, the final 512MB operates at a significantly slower rate. i still think nvidia's internal misunderstanding stems from their marketing approach—if they truly intended to deceive enthusiasts, they’d have chosen a more accurate name instead of spreading misleading data that doesn’t really matter. (as jayztwocents put it: "the benchmarks remain valid, nothing has changed")

J
JEFF_JEFFERSON
Senior Member
627
04-14-2021, 10:15 PM
#16
I've never tried managing my cores in this way before; I'm not sure what the outcome would be. It could relate to a GPU or CPU problem. Apologies if I seem clueless.
J
JEFF_JEFFERSON
04-14-2021, 10:15 PM #16

I've never tried managing my cores in this way before; I'm not sure what the outcome would be. It could relate to a GPU or CPU problem. Apologies if I seem clueless.

2
20wdv
Junior Member
2
04-22-2021, 03:06 AM
#17
This essentially indicates that the last four threads, along with any additional ones added to the CPU, are simply idle silicon.
2
20wdv
04-22-2021, 03:06 AM #17

This essentially indicates that the last four threads, along with any additional ones added to the CPU, are simply idle silicon.

E
Elliepls
Member
222
04-29-2021, 05:59 PM
#18
Ah, now I get your abbreviations. I thought that "2c" meant core #2, but it was just the amount of cores you had enabled. So yeah... 4 threads is max. But that doesn't make sense either. If 4 threads is the max it likes, shouldn't those 4 threads max out to like 100 % then?
E
Elliepls
04-29-2021, 05:59 PM #18

Ah, now I get your abbreviations. I thought that "2c" meant core #2, but it was just the amount of cores you had enabled. So yeah... 4 threads is max. But that doesn't make sense either. If 4 threads is the max it likes, shouldn't those 4 threads max out to like 100 % then?

K
KingEvolvedYT
Junior Member
10
05-06-2021, 11:13 AM
#19
windows behaves a bit oddly depending on thread allocation. With just four threads it shows heavy usage on those cores, but when all eight are used it drops below 50% across the board. I can't say for sure if this is due to windersp or if the performance is affected by how skylines is written, but that's what it seems to be.
K
KingEvolvedYT
05-06-2021, 11:13 AM #19

windows behaves a bit oddly depending on thread allocation. With just four threads it shows heavy usage on those cores, but when all eight are used it drops below 50% across the board. I can't say for sure if this is due to windersp or if the performance is affected by how skylines is written, but that's what it seems to be.

B
bkcarlito
Junior Member
5
05-07-2021, 07:54 AM
#20
Save the CPU control and direct the task to utilize the desired cores.
B
bkcarlito
05-07-2021, 07:54 AM #20

Save the CPU control and direct the task to utilize the desired cores.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next