F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Identify the constraint in the process

Identify the constraint in the process

Identify the constraint in the process

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
M
Mrnelson2003
Member
75
01-25-2016, 02:10 PM
#11
If you're unfamiliar with interpreting its results, skip Wireshark—it's a specialized professional tool.
M
Mrnelson2003
01-25-2016, 02:10 PM #11

If you're unfamiliar with interpreting its results, skip Wireshark—it's a specialized professional tool.

N
Niemandes
Junior Member
49
01-25-2016, 05:46 PM
#12
This setting is set to use IPv6 by default. For dual-stack connections, consider turning off IPv6 to check for performance changes.
N
Niemandes
01-25-2016, 05:46 PM #12

This setting is set to use IPv6 by default. For dual-stack connections, consider turning off IPv6 to check for performance changes.

T
Teddy_bear202
Member
180
01-25-2016, 06:17 PM
#13
It works at 2.4GHz and 5GHz because it actually supports those speeds. Your computer struggles with 5GHz regardless.
T
Teddy_bear202
01-25-2016, 06:17 PM #13

It works at 2.4GHz and 5GHz because it actually supports those speeds. Your computer struggles with 5GHz regardless.

K
kungfutyla
Posting Freak
780
02-05-2016, 11:42 PM
#14
He isn't discussing the TCP protocol version the system picks automatically. I'm not sure about that either. I haven't seen a Windows setup use IPv6 before. My ISP in Australia seems to have added it.
K
kungfutyla
02-05-2016, 11:42 PM #14

He isn't discussing the TCP protocol version the system picks automatically. I'm not sure about that either. I haven't seen a Windows setup use IPv6 before. My ISP in Australia seems to have added it.

A
Alideew1234
Junior Member
5
02-07-2016, 07:52 PM
#15
It functions with both IPv4 (a standard format like 100.100.100.100) and IPv6 (a modern address structure). If the link supports IPv4 but not IPv6, you may want to turn off IPv6 to test its impact.
A
Alideew1234
02-07-2016, 07:52 PM #15

It functions with both IPv4 (a standard format like 100.100.100.100) and IPv6 (a modern address structure). If the link supports IPv4 but not IPv6, you may want to turn off IPv6 to test its impact.

M
MrLeonardo
Junior Member
40
02-15-2016, 10:43 AM
#16
Disabled it and there seems to be some improvement. It's unclear if it's just random changes, but I'm fluctuating between 4-10 Mbps. Still not ideal, but better than before. EDIT: Spoke too soon, now it's between 800kbps to 3 Mbps.
M
MrLeonardo
02-15-2016, 10:43 AM #16

Disabled it and there seems to be some improvement. It's unclear if it's just random changes, but I'm fluctuating between 4-10 Mbps. Still not ideal, but better than before. EDIT: Spoke too soon, now it's between 800kbps to 3 Mbps.

T
TeddyCoM
Member
53
02-17-2016, 08:43 AM
#17
@Tabs Funny.. you've challenged a seasoned network expert with just two words: "dual stack". If I'd asked earlier, I'd say it wouldn't really matter, but the details count. I imagine it would involve DNS handling—resolving an IPv6 address would use that format, while IPv4 might get wrapped up. It could be encapsulated or not, depending on setup. Great job!
T
TeddyCoM
02-17-2016, 08:43 AM #17

@Tabs Funny.. you've challenged a seasoned network expert with just two words: "dual stack". If I'd asked earlier, I'd say it wouldn't really matter, but the details count. I imagine it would involve DNS handling—resolving an IPv6 address would use that format, while IPv4 might get wrapped up. It could be encapsulated or not, depending on setup. Great job!

S
SB0823
Member
173
02-17-2016, 09:10 AM
#18
From a user standpoint, when both IPv6 and IPv4 options are available—through DNS or simply because a non-link-local address is offered—Windows tends to favor one protocol over the other, usually IPv6. This can lead to performance issues because traffic often goes through ISP-managed 6-to-4 servers to maintain connectivity across the internet, even when IPv6 is used for host-side communication. Without these 6-to-4 proxies, minor delays in DNS requests would be noticeable, but the complexity of ISP-level routing makes the situation much more complicated.
S
SB0823
02-17-2016, 09:10 AM #18

From a user standpoint, when both IPv6 and IPv4 options are available—through DNS or simply because a non-link-local address is offered—Windows tends to favor one protocol over the other, usually IPv6. This can lead to performance issues because traffic often goes through ISP-managed 6-to-4 servers to maintain connectivity across the internet, even when IPv6 is used for host-side communication. Without these 6-to-4 proxies, minor delays in DNS requests would be noticeable, but the complexity of ISP-level routing makes the situation much more complicated.

S
Sturmwaffle
Member
82
02-23-2016, 02:39 AM
#19
Uncertain whether we're connected, but the performance has gotten better, though it varies widely—sometimes under 1mbps, other times near 10mbps.
S
Sturmwaffle
02-23-2016, 02:39 AM #19

Uncertain whether we're connected, but the performance has gotten better, though it varies widely—sometimes under 1mbps, other times near 10mbps.

P
Pickmaster12
Senior Member
710
02-29-2016, 08:29 PM
#20
It’s interesting to discover something fresh each day. This approach often happens on the ISP side without the customer’s awareness. Why would they send everything from 6 to 4? That doesn’t make sense!
P
Pickmaster12
02-29-2016, 08:29 PM #20

It’s interesting to discover something fresh each day. This approach often happens on the ISP side without the customer’s awareness. Why would they send everything from 6 to 4? That doesn’t make sense!

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next