F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop i9 10900K[F] auto Vcore issue?

i9 10900K[F] auto Vcore issue?

i9 10900K[F] auto Vcore issue?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
X
Xikam20
Member
65
11-08-2021, 08:55 PM
#1
I have an i9 10900KF installed on an ASRock Z590 Steel Legend 6E WiFi board. Reviews indicate the voltage and boost settings closely match Intel’s specifications on this platform. I’ve kept everything stock unless I enabled the XMP profile for RAM. I’m interested in observing the stock voltage changes during boot up to 5.3GHz—this happens quite often, especially with the powerful air cooler. I’m running the latest BIOS version (v1.40) that supports Intel adaptive boost. While playing games, the CPU ratio can reach up to 5.3GHz for a significant portion of the time, with boosts after each clock tick. In CPU-Z, I’ve recorded voltages reaching as high as 1.488V. That’s a bit concerning because it doesn’t maintain that level consistently—perhaps only a couple seconds at a time. Most of the time it drops below 1.25V, with occasional spikes to about 1.38V and the higher 1.488V. Is this typical behavior for an i9 10900K? When the processor automatically boosts to 5.3GHz, what core voltage should I expect in CPU-Z? The maximum VID is a bit higher, but that’s what the chip actually requests, even though the motherboard doesn’t deliver it.
X
Xikam20
11-08-2021, 08:55 PM #1

I have an i9 10900KF installed on an ASRock Z590 Steel Legend 6E WiFi board. Reviews indicate the voltage and boost settings closely match Intel’s specifications on this platform. I’ve kept everything stock unless I enabled the XMP profile for RAM. I’m interested in observing the stock voltage changes during boot up to 5.3GHz—this happens quite often, especially with the powerful air cooler. I’m running the latest BIOS version (v1.40) that supports Intel adaptive boost. While playing games, the CPU ratio can reach up to 5.3GHz for a significant portion of the time, with boosts after each clock tick. In CPU-Z, I’ve recorded voltages reaching as high as 1.488V. That’s a bit concerning because it doesn’t maintain that level consistently—perhaps only a couple seconds at a time. Most of the time it drops below 1.25V, with occasional spikes to about 1.38V and the higher 1.488V. Is this typical behavior for an i9 10900K? When the processor automatically boosts to 5.3GHz, what core voltage should I expect in CPU-Z? The maximum VID is a bit higher, but that’s what the chip actually requests, even though the motherboard doesn’t deliver it.

M
maxdu632
Member
210
11-09-2021, 01:25 AM
#2
Activating XMP usually alters its operation, often making it more aggressive. To push the extreme end of 10900k to 5.3GHz, around 1.5V appears sensible. Use a negative voltage offset for CPU core voltage to "resolve" the high voltage, though you should verify stability afterward.
M
maxdu632
11-09-2021, 01:25 AM #2

Activating XMP usually alters its operation, often making it more aggressive. To push the extreme end of 10900k to 5.3GHz, around 1.5V appears sensible. Use a negative voltage offset for CPU core voltage to "resolve" the high voltage, though you should verify stability afterward.

B
Blazer444
Member
146
11-14-2021, 03:38 AM
#3
When anything noticeable runs at 5.3ghz, it means you're overclocking. This processor rarely hits 5.3ghz; it's more common around 4.9ghz, or even 4.8ghz when TVB limits occur because the automatic voltage will likely exceed 70°C. Adjusting your settings manually is the optimal choice. If not, revert to the default and avoid letting it auto-overclock.
B
Blazer444
11-14-2021, 03:38 AM #3

When anything noticeable runs at 5.3ghz, it means you're overclocking. This processor rarely hits 5.3ghz; it's more common around 4.9ghz, or even 4.8ghz when TVB limits occur because the automatic voltage will likely exceed 70°C. Adjusting your settings manually is the optimal choice. If not, revert to the default and avoid letting it auto-overclock.

E
EpicTurtle57
Junior Member
44
11-15-2021, 12:54 AM
#4
psst, 10900K/KF single core boost is 5.3ghz homie.
E
EpicTurtle57
11-15-2021, 12:54 AM #4

psst, 10900K/KF single core boost is 5.3ghz homie.

V
Vezwin
Junior Member
10
11-15-2021, 07:39 AM
#5
Windows operates differently from typical single-core systems; it efficiently manages multiple cores rather than relying heavily on a single one. Most often it maintains performance around 3 to 4 cores boosted. In aggressive settings, motherboards frequently increase the maximum clock speed for all cores.
V
Vezwin
11-15-2021, 07:39 AM #5

Windows operates differently from typical single-core systems; it efficiently manages multiple cores rather than relying heavily on a single one. Most often it maintains performance around 3 to 4 cores boosted. In aggressive settings, motherboards frequently increase the maximum clock speed for all cores.

A
ArneTheArne123
Junior Member
45
11-26-2021, 01:12 PM
#6
I understand this won't appear at the stock level. I had to adjust active cores to four at 5.3ghz just to see it in the cb single-core high-priority test. About ninety-nine percent of r time stock clocks will hover between 4.8 and 4.9ghz, unless they match the spec closely and then power limits will drop to around 4.3 or less.
A
ArneTheArne123
11-26-2021, 01:12 PM #6

I understand this won't appear at the stock level. I had to adjust active cores to four at 5.3ghz just to see it in the cb single-core high-priority test. About ninety-nine percent of r time stock clocks will hover between 4.8 and 4.9ghz, unless they match the spec closely and then power limits will drop to around 4.3 or less.

Z
Zyu_UY
Member
100
11-26-2021, 02:54 PM
#7
My processor remains below 70°C per core—usually around 37-50°C during games. Occasionally a core hits 70°C or even 75°C briefly. The cooling solution isn’t very strong: it’s a Scythe Fuma 2 with stock fans, which offers less power than a Noctua D14. According to HWInfo64 and CPU-Z, it can jump to about 5.3GHz during gaming. However, the workload mainly uses just one core, and other tasks are limited to Chrome with many tabs open. HWinfo64 indicates the maximum core VID is around 1.519V when boosting (with fluctuations), but CPU-Z shows readings dropping below 1V and sometimes reaching 1.25V, occasionally up to 1.488V. Regarding XMP profiles, it’s simpler to adjust RAM settings without long sessions of timing changes and varied voltages—unless you’re concerned about longevity, which isn’t necessary here given the low temps. It probably isn’t worth the effort.
Z
Zyu_UY
11-26-2021, 02:54 PM #7

My processor remains below 70°C per core—usually around 37-50°C during games. Occasionally a core hits 70°C or even 75°C briefly. The cooling solution isn’t very strong: it’s a Scythe Fuma 2 with stock fans, which offers less power than a Noctua D14. According to HWInfo64 and CPU-Z, it can jump to about 5.3GHz during gaming. However, the workload mainly uses just one core, and other tasks are limited to Chrome with many tabs open. HWinfo64 indicates the maximum core VID is around 1.519V when boosting (with fluctuations), but CPU-Z shows readings dropping below 1V and sometimes reaching 1.25V, occasionally up to 1.488V. Regarding XMP profiles, it’s simpler to adjust RAM settings without long sessions of timing changes and varied voltages—unless you’re concerned about longevity, which isn’t necessary here given the low temps. It probably isn’t worth the effort.

P
Piepnow_
Junior Member
43
11-26-2021, 03:39 PM
#8
Vid isn't the vcore. CPUz shows the correct vcore value. In hwinfo64, check for VR VOUT or a similar setting. That's your vcore.
P
Piepnow_
11-26-2021, 03:39 PM #8

Vid isn't the vcore. CPUz shows the correct vcore value. In hwinfo64, check for VR VOUT or a similar setting. That's your vcore.

M
maxdu57
Junior Member
23
11-27-2021, 06:20 PM
#9
I’ve noted this difference in my previous posts, and I understand it. That’s why I referenced Vcore and checked CPU-Z. Is this a sustainable path moving forward, or should I consider adjusting the settings?
M
maxdu57
11-27-2021, 06:20 PM #9

I’ve noted this difference in my previous posts, and I understand it. That’s why I referenced Vcore and checked CPU-Z. Is this a sustainable path moving forward, or should I consider adjusting the settings?

J
joaoplay
Member
141
11-27-2021, 07:06 PM
#10
Should be fine, but if you do any heavy cpu lifting just monitor thermals
J
joaoplay
11-27-2021, 07:06 PM #10

Should be fine, but if you do any heavy cpu lifting just monitor thermals

Pages (2): 1 2 Next