F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop I7 model without performance enhancement beyond standard settings

I7 model without performance enhancement beyond standard settings

I7 model without performance enhancement beyond standard settings

K
ksamp3
Member
60
01-16-2016, 06:35 AM
#1
You're adjusting your overclock settings to match the Cinebench K score for the I7-4770K. The numbers you're using seem to be a rough estimate of what you expect based on your current and target frequencies. It's important to keep in mind that achieving the exact Cinebench K score at 822 points typically requires stable frequencies close to the target, which is why you're aiming for around 4030 MHz. Just make sure your cooling and power supply can handle the load before you start pushing it further.
K
ksamp3
01-16-2016, 06:35 AM #1

You're adjusting your overclock settings to match the Cinebench K score for the I7-4770K. The numbers you're using seem to be a rough estimate of what you expect based on your current and target frequencies. It's important to keep in mind that achieving the exact Cinebench K score at 822 points typically requires stable frequencies close to the target, which is why you're aiming for around 4030 MHz. Just make sure your cooling and power supply can handle the load before you start pushing it further.

L
Lord_Foxtrot
Senior Member
408
01-16-2016, 12:08 PM
#2
You might consider increasing the base clock, but it's not advised. There could be other reasons you need an OC beyond just getting numbers right. These CPUs aren't designed for overclocking, and without proper adjustments on a non-K architecture, you shouldn't expect success. Doing so could harm your CPU or motherboard if temperatures, voltage, etc., become unstable.
L
Lord_Foxtrot
01-16-2016, 12:08 PM #2

You might consider increasing the base clock, but it's not advised. There could be other reasons you need an OC beyond just getting numbers right. These CPUs aren't designed for overclocking, and without proper adjustments on a non-K architecture, you shouldn't expect success. Doing so could harm your CPU or motherboard if temperatures, voltage, etc., become unstable.

S
stargladeESP
Member
55
01-16-2016, 04:10 PM
#3
Some problems exist with baseclock overclocking in Haswell processors on Z97 and Z87 chips. In short, the base clock isn't just about processor speed—it also affects memory, SATA, and PCIe connections (though not fully on PCIe). This can lead to instability and unexpected issues elsewhere in the system. For many generations before Skylake, multiplier overclocking is the best approach. Skylake changed that because its base clock was separated from the rest of the system. Unfortunately, for Haswell users, the base clock remains linked to other components.
S
stargladeESP
01-16-2016, 04:10 PM #3

Some problems exist with baseclock overclocking in Haswell processors on Z97 and Z87 chips. In short, the base clock isn't just about processor speed—it also affects memory, SATA, and PCIe connections (though not fully on PCIe). This can lead to instability and unexpected issues elsewhere in the system. For many generations before Skylake, multiplier overclocking is the best approach. Skylake changed that because its base clock was separated from the rest of the system. Unfortunately, for Haswell users, the base clock remains linked to other components.

_
_unknown___
Member
134
01-17-2016, 01:06 AM
#4
This frequently leads to issues and disruptions in areas of the system that weren't meant to be affected. I'm going to reset the BIOS now!
_
_unknown___
01-17-2016, 01:06 AM #4

This frequently leads to issues and disruptions in areas of the system that weren't meant to be affected. I'm going to reset the BIOS now!

A
AMumaw
Junior Member
3
01-17-2016, 09:51 AM
#5
Good idea
A
AMumaw
01-17-2016, 09:51 AM #5

Good idea

S
spotDC
Junior Member
36
01-29-2016, 11:55 AM
#6
Sure, avoid pushing the clock speed too high through bclk. I’d usually settle for 101 or 102. Even if it functions, the improvement would be minimal and not worth the effort.
S
spotDC
01-29-2016, 11:55 AM #6

Sure, avoid pushing the clock speed too high through bclk. I’d usually settle for 101 or 102. Even if it functions, the improvement would be minimal and not worth the effort.

N
Nikos3434
Member
133
02-04-2016, 01:53 AM
#7
If your BIOS doesn’t allow securing the clocks of other devices, you’ll likely end up boosting every other bus in the setup. As @Founders noted, this approach can lead to issues. In my previous attempt on Haswell with a 4670k and Z87 board, I couldn’t exceed the base clock by more than 4%, which was insufficient.
N
Nikos3434
02-04-2016, 01:53 AM #7

If your BIOS doesn’t allow securing the clocks of other devices, you’ll likely end up boosting every other bus in the setup. As @Founders noted, this approach can lead to issues. In my previous attempt on Haswell with a 4670k and Z87 board, I couldn’t exceed the base clock by more than 4%, which was insufficient.

B
Bliep2
Member
81
02-04-2016, 08:22 PM
#8
I'm checking at 103.34 MHz BCLK (4030 MHz) to hit the theoretical 4225 MHz CPU frequency, and I need to get up to 107.99 MHz BCLK.
B
Bliep2
02-04-2016, 08:22 PM #8

I'm checking at 103.34 MHz BCLK (4030 MHz) to hit the theoretical 4225 MHz CPU frequency, and I need to get up to 107.99 MHz BCLK.

P
PapiMarc_
Member
144
02-06-2016, 12:06 PM
#9
Verify the calculation for multiplier x39.
P
PapiMarc_
02-06-2016, 12:06 PM #9

Verify the calculation for multiplier x39.

C
Caribbean_Blue
Senior Member
609
02-17-2016, 09:40 PM
#10
Consider using a K-series CPU and then applying OCR cautiously. If you need more control, aim for the best possible setup while staying within safe limits.
C
Caribbean_Blue
02-17-2016, 09:40 PM #10

Consider using a K-series CPU and then applying OCR cautiously. If you need more control, aim for the best possible setup while staying within safe limits.