F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop i5-2500K clocked at 6 GHz?

i5-2500K clocked at 6 GHz?

i5-2500K clocked at 6 GHz?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
LEPticon
Junior Member
21
07-23-2024, 06:39 AM
#1
L
LEPticon
07-23-2024, 06:39 AM #1

C
camchrism
Member
212
07-24-2024, 11:48 AM
#2
I’ll need some evidence from the boss. 5GHz worked well on Sandy Bridge, but after that it needed top-notch processors. Don’t include Task Manager—use CPUZ or hwinfo64 instead.
C
camchrism
07-24-2024, 11:48 AM #2

I’ll need some evidence from the boss. 5GHz worked well on Sandy Bridge, but after that it needed top-notch processors. Don’t include Task Manager—use CPUZ or hwinfo64 instead.

T
tippestwolf70
Member
227
07-28-2024, 07:30 PM
#3
I understand what you're referring to. Using a suitable tool, I can see it's operating at 3.4GHz, which might mean the original 6.8GHz was set to 4.5GHz. I'm planning to test this now. Regarding the Windows display of 5.9GHz, that could be due to various factors.
T
tippestwolf70
07-28-2024, 07:30 PM #3

I understand what you're referring to. Using a suitable tool, I can see it's operating at 3.4GHz, which might mean the original 6.8GHz was set to 4.5GHz. I'm planning to test this now. Regarding the Windows display of 5.9GHz, that could be due to various factors.

T
TPG_Khalatic
Member
183
07-30-2024, 06:22 PM
#4
Task Manager isn't functioning properly when checking reading speed. My 5930K would show 42GHz instead of the actual 4.2GHz, and it's been this way before and will keep being inconsistent.
T
TPG_Khalatic
07-30-2024, 06:22 PM #4

Task Manager isn't functioning properly when checking reading speed. My 5930K would show 42GHz instead of the actual 4.2GHz, and it's been this way before and will keep being inconsistent.

N
nikiinfinityy
Junior Member
15
07-30-2024, 08:32 PM
#5
It was a situation where relying too much on Windows was an issue. Now I have the right measurement tools, and I’m handling things correctly. Gradually increase testing and observe. 4GHz appears to hit around 70°C, though it’s still stable at the moment.
N
nikiinfinityy
07-30-2024, 08:32 PM #5

It was a situation where relying too much on Windows was an issue. Now I have the right measurement tools, and I’m handling things correctly. Gradually increase testing and observe. 4GHz appears to hit around 70°C, though it’s still stable at the moment.

M
MerelNagelhout
Junior Member
11
08-06-2024, 09:19 PM
#6
Based on what I remember, the highest common overclock reached for early i7 processors was around 4.8 during Sandy Bridge. Ivy Bridge came in at about 4.5, and Haswell dropped to 4.2. An i5-4.5 could likely run smoothly on any 2500K chip, but pushing past 4.8 would be risky and only worth considering if you're comfortable with voltage changes.
M
MerelNagelhout
08-06-2024, 09:19 PM #6

Based on what I remember, the highest common overclock reached for early i7 processors was around 4.8 during Sandy Bridge. Ivy Bridge came in at about 4.5, and Haswell dropped to 4.2. An i5-4.5 could likely run smoothly on any 2500K chip, but pushing past 4.8 would be risky and only worth considering if you're comfortable with voltage changes.

B
BasedCheenaGod
Junior Member
10
08-14-2024, 10:50 AM
#7
Despite reaching 4.5GHz, I decided not to push it further, especially with the heat and fan noise. My satisfaction came from my "6GHz" setup, possibly due to a placebo effect or the RAM upgrade from 16GB to 32GB. It's now running at 3.8GHz to stay under 70°C while still suitable for my tasks—graphic design, 3D work, old games, and mostly YouTube. Thanks to everyone for the advice; it means a lot and I hope others benefit too!
B
BasedCheenaGod
08-14-2024, 10:50 AM #7

Despite reaching 4.5GHz, I decided not to push it further, especially with the heat and fan noise. My satisfaction came from my "6GHz" setup, possibly due to a placebo effect or the RAM upgrade from 16GB to 32GB. It's now running at 3.8GHz to stay under 70°C while still suitable for my tasks—graphic design, 3D work, old games, and mostly YouTube. Thanks to everyone for the advice; it means a lot and I hope others benefit too!

S
sandieaak
Member
182
08-16-2024, 04:38 PM
#8
This problem has existed for nearly ten years, mainly because VT-x is turned on in the BIOS.
S
sandieaak
08-16-2024, 04:38 PM #8

This problem has existed for nearly ten years, mainly because VT-x is turned on in the BIOS.

L
ladybug022
Member
137
08-16-2024, 09:25 PM
#9
//hwbot.org/submission/4435577_d0minat0r_cpu_frequency_core_i5_2500k_6382_mhz
L
ladybug022
08-16-2024, 09:25 PM #9

//hwbot.org/submission/4435577_d0minat0r_cpu_frequency_core_i5_2500k_6382_mhz

L
Luidschi
Junior Member
42
08-19-2024, 08:39 AM
#10
I’m sticking to 5GHz and using air cooling. My 3770K was in the 6s, and I also had to cover the board with insulation since it was extremely cold. That’s exactly what you need to reach those low temperatures.
L
Luidschi
08-19-2024, 08:39 AM #10

I’m sticking to 5GHz and using air cooling. My 3770K was in the 6s, and I also had to cover the board with insulation since it was extremely cold. That’s exactly what you need to reach those low temperatures.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next