F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking i3-6100 with ASRock Z170 Pro4

i3-6100 with ASRock Z170 Pro4

i3-6100 with ASRock Z170 Pro4

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
mineswagger12
Member
60
03-03-2016, 10:17 AM
#1
I've just installed a new video card and want to finally overclock my i3-6100. I only have the standard cooling fan that came with the board. ASRock now allows me to overclock even non-K CPUs, so I'm eager to take advantage of this. How can I safely boost my CPU performance as much as possible using just the stock cooling fan? Also, how do I keep an eye on my system temperatures in real time?

Here are my details:
ASRock Z170 Pro4
Intel Core i3-6100
ASUS ENGT520 Silent - NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Crucial Technology 8GB DDR4-2400

I'm looking to fine-tune my setup to get the best performance possible with only the stock cooling solution. (And please, feel free to suggest a better cooling option for maximum tweaking!) Thanks a lot for your assistance.
M
mineswagger12
03-03-2016, 10:17 AM #1

I've just installed a new video card and want to finally overclock my i3-6100. I only have the standard cooling fan that came with the board. ASRock now allows me to overclock even non-K CPUs, so I'm eager to take advantage of this. How can I safely boost my CPU performance as much as possible using just the stock cooling fan? Also, how do I keep an eye on my system temperatures in real time?

Here are my details:
ASRock Z170 Pro4
Intel Core i3-6100
ASUS ENGT520 Silent - NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Crucial Technology 8GB DDR4-2400

I'm looking to fine-tune my setup to get the best performance possible with only the stock cooling solution. (And please, feel free to suggest a better cooling option for maximum tweaking!) Thanks a lot for your assistance.

I
193
03-03-2016, 07:17 PM
#2
Shrugg :
Chugalug_ :
I suggest replacing the AsRock board with an i5 6500 or 6600 and opting for a H110 or H170 instead of the Z170.
No need to push overclock on an i3.
You already noticed the parts are bought and in use, but could you clarify why you chose the H110 or H170 rather than the Z170? Thanks.
Z170 boards are ideal for unlocked chips and overclocking.
The H170 matches that functionality without overclocking.
The H110 is more affordable.
The i3 struggles with overclocking since it's designed for low-end use.
i5 cores are stronger and the CPU will better handle a stronger GPU.
Sorry I'm in a hurry, I'll be back in an hour...
I
itzMikaHackzZ_
03-03-2016, 07:17 PM #2

Shrugg :
Chugalug_ :
I suggest replacing the AsRock board with an i5 6500 or 6600 and opting for a H110 or H170 instead of the Z170.
No need to push overclock on an i3.
You already noticed the parts are bought and in use, but could you clarify why you chose the H110 or H170 rather than the Z170? Thanks.
Z170 boards are ideal for unlocked chips and overclocking.
The H170 matches that functionality without overclocking.
The H110 is more affordable.
The i3 struggles with overclocking since it's designed for low-end use.
i5 cores are stronger and the CPU will better handle a stronger GPU.
Sorry I'm in a hurry, I'll be back in an hour...

K
KingJjpr
Member
214
03-04-2016, 10:41 AM
#3
Having a solid collection of utilities is essential, including AIDA64, Prime95, and Hardware Info. With these tools, you can efficiently stress test and track every measurable component of the system.
For the CPU, I advise against overclocking unless it's specifically designed for it. First, it isn't intended for overclocking. Second, Intel has criticized ASRock for using workarounds in their BIOS. I suggest updating to the newest BIOS (which will eliminate the overclocking option for non-K CPUs) since damaging the socket, power delivery, or CPU would not be compensated for, as Intel has stated they oppose such changes and won't replace CPUs now that updates are available.
If you're planning to overclock, choose a CPU built for that purpose.
K
KingJjpr
03-04-2016, 10:41 AM #3

Having a solid collection of utilities is essential, including AIDA64, Prime95, and Hardware Info. With these tools, you can efficiently stress test and track every measurable component of the system.
For the CPU, I advise against overclocking unless it's specifically designed for it. First, it isn't intended for overclocking. Second, Intel has criticized ASRock for using workarounds in their BIOS. I suggest updating to the newest BIOS (which will eliminate the overclocking option for non-K CPUs) since damaging the socket, power delivery, or CPU would not be compensated for, as Intel has stated they oppose such changes and won't replace CPUs now that updates are available.
If you're planning to overclock, choose a CPU built for that purpose.

D
Donald_Trumpz
Member
246
03-04-2016, 02:39 PM
#4
I suggest removing the AsRock board and using the money from the mobo to buy an i5 6500 or 6600, along with a H110 or H170 board at a lower price. No need to push overclocking on an i3.
D
Donald_Trumpz
03-04-2016, 02:39 PM #4

I suggest removing the AsRock board and using the money from the mobo to buy an i5 6500 or 6600, along with a H110 or H170 board at a lower price. No need to push overclocking on an i3.

B
Browen1000
Member
224
03-04-2016, 08:25 PM
#5
OCing on the stock cooler isn’t ideal. You might manage a few hundred MHz before things spiral out of control, but realistically you’d likely hit around 10% at most when everything gets hot. It’s not worth it, particularly since high-quality air coolers are now affordable.

Consider getting a Cryorig h7 for $30:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...-_-Product

Follow a tutorial such as this one: http://overclocking.guide/asrock-z170-no...ing-guide/
My main concern with that guide is it only suggests a "1.325" voltage. Although that could be a solid starting point, it’s important to invest time in lowering it further.

Here’s a brief OC 101: The two main controls are frequency and voltage. Frequency directly affects how quickly your CPU runs, while voltage supplies more power, helping the CPU stay stable at higher speeds.

Raising the voltage significantly raises both temperature and power consumption. Ideally, you want high frequency paired with low voltage. As frequency increases, instability usually sets in—often within seconds. Stress testing can reveal problems quickly. You might raise voltage to keep the CPU running smoothly at higher speeds, but this comes at the cost of heat and power usage.

Every CPU behaves differently, so guides that recommend fixed values may not suit every system. If your CPU isn’t performing well, you might still achieve stability with a lower voltage, saving heat and power, or pushing frequency even higher at the same voltage.

Overall, it’s worthwhile dedicating time to discover the optimal settings for your processor. Create a simple table tracking frequency, voltage, and temperatures under load. Experiment with different values and observe the results. This will help you identify the ideal balance for your CPU and its requirements. As you near the hardware limit, each 100Mhz increase demands larger voltage adjustments—unless you’re ready to push the CPU to its maximum, it’s better to revert to a more stable setting before performance starts to degrade.
B
Browen1000
03-04-2016, 08:25 PM #5

OCing on the stock cooler isn’t ideal. You might manage a few hundred MHz before things spiral out of control, but realistically you’d likely hit around 10% at most when everything gets hot. It’s not worth it, particularly since high-quality air coolers are now affordable.

Consider getting a Cryorig h7 for $30:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...-_-Product

Follow a tutorial such as this one: http://overclocking.guide/asrock-z170-no...ing-guide/
My main concern with that guide is it only suggests a "1.325" voltage. Although that could be a solid starting point, it’s important to invest time in lowering it further.

Here’s a brief OC 101: The two main controls are frequency and voltage. Frequency directly affects how quickly your CPU runs, while voltage supplies more power, helping the CPU stay stable at higher speeds.

Raising the voltage significantly raises both temperature and power consumption. Ideally, you want high frequency paired with low voltage. As frequency increases, instability usually sets in—often within seconds. Stress testing can reveal problems quickly. You might raise voltage to keep the CPU running smoothly at higher speeds, but this comes at the cost of heat and power usage.

Every CPU behaves differently, so guides that recommend fixed values may not suit every system. If your CPU isn’t performing well, you might still achieve stability with a lower voltage, saving heat and power, or pushing frequency even higher at the same voltage.

Overall, it’s worthwhile dedicating time to discover the optimal settings for your processor. Create a simple table tracking frequency, voltage, and temperatures under load. Experiment with different values and observe the results. This will help you identify the ideal balance for your CPU and its requirements. As you near the hardware limit, each 100Mhz increase demands larger voltage adjustments—unless you’re ready to push the CPU to its maximum, it’s better to revert to a more stable setting before performance starts to degrade.

N
nenette24
Member
149
03-04-2016, 09:10 PM
#6
I've opted to invest a bit more in an upgraded cooler.
The Cryorig H7 is presently listed at $30 on Newegg, a great offer!
You'll be well covered with this setup:
PCPartPicker part list:
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/W9yZRG
Price details by seller: http://pcpartpicker.com/list/W9yZRG/by_merchant/
CPU: Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor ($199.99 @ B&H)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG H7 49.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($30.00)
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($57.88 @ OutletPC)
Overall cost: $287.87
Shipping, taxes, and available discounts are included
Created by PCPartPicker 2016-07-13 22:54 EDT-0400
N
nenette24
03-04-2016, 09:10 PM #6

I've opted to invest a bit more in an upgraded cooler.
The Cryorig H7 is presently listed at $30 on Newegg, a great offer!
You'll be well covered with this setup:
PCPartPicker part list:
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/W9yZRG
Price details by seller: http://pcpartpicker.com/list/W9yZRG/by_merchant/
CPU: Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor ($199.99 @ B&H)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG H7 49.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($30.00)
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($57.88 @ OutletPC)
Overall cost: $287.87
Shipping, taxes, and available discounts are included
Created by PCPartPicker 2016-07-13 22:54 EDT-0400

F
FireBrand2000
Member
136
03-11-2016, 01:03 AM
#7
for the CPU, I advise against overclocking a chip that isn't unlocked. First of all, it wasn't designed for that purpose. Also, Intel has responded to ASRock by using workarounds in their BIOS. I suggest updating to the newest BIOS version (which will eliminate the overclocking option for non-K CPUs), since damaging the socket, power delivery, or the CPU itself wouldn't be covered. Intel has stated they don't support this idea and won't replace CPUs now that updates are available.

Many major motherboard makers have also adopted non-k OC, though they didn't publicize it as ASRock did. Overclocking technically voids your warranty, so Intel would not replace a CPU regardless of whether it's unlocked or not.

Concerning the claim that chips aren't built for overclocking: unlocked variants use the same silicon as locked ones. Intel simply disables OC on certain models to charge a higher price for unlocked CPUs. It seems there might be a slight difference for i3s, but it's probably not significant in terms of construction.
F
FireBrand2000
03-11-2016, 01:03 AM #7

for the CPU, I advise against overclocking a chip that isn't unlocked. First of all, it wasn't designed for that purpose. Also, Intel has responded to ASRock by using workarounds in their BIOS. I suggest updating to the newest BIOS version (which will eliminate the overclocking option for non-K CPUs), since damaging the socket, power delivery, or the CPU itself wouldn't be covered. Intel has stated they don't support this idea and won't replace CPUs now that updates are available.

Many major motherboard makers have also adopted non-k OC, though they didn't publicize it as ASRock did. Overclocking technically voids your warranty, so Intel would not replace a CPU regardless of whether it's unlocked or not.

Concerning the claim that chips aren't built for overclocking: unlocked variants use the same silicon as locked ones. Intel simply disables OC on certain models to charge a higher price for unlocked CPUs. It seems there might be a slight difference for i3s, but it's probably not significant in terms of construction.

J
JebThePleb
Posting Freak
898
03-11-2016, 06:31 AM
#8
Sorry, just a note, I didn't think the OP had purchased the components yet.
🙁 The Cryorig H5 is the best choice for a cooler, priced at $30, providing the top value for cooling performance right now.
J
JebThePleb
03-11-2016, 06:31 AM #8

Sorry, just a note, I didn't think the OP had purchased the components yet.
🙁 The Cryorig H5 is the best choice for a cooler, priced at $30, providing the top value for cooling performance right now.

J
jamous1
Member
197
03-11-2016, 09:12 PM
#9
Also, your graphics card isn't great. The built-in graphics on your CPU perform better. Consider getting the RX480 4GB for $200—it offers solid performance and can handle most tasks smoothly at 60fps in 1080p.
J
jamous1
03-11-2016, 09:12 PM #9

Also, your graphics card isn't great. The built-in graphics on your CPU perform better. Consider getting the RX480 4GB for $200—it offers solid performance and can handle most tasks smoothly at 60fps in 1080p.

K
ksamp3
Member
60
03-18-2016, 05:14 PM
#10
I suggest removing the AsRock board and using the money from the mobo to buy an i5 6500 or 6600, along with a H110 or H170 board for better value.
Overclocking an i3 isn't worth it.
You already noticed the parts were bought and in use, but could you clarify why you're choosing the H110 instead of the Z170?
K
ksamp3
03-18-2016, 05:14 PM #10

I suggest removing the AsRock board and using the money from the mobo to buy an i5 6500 or 6600, along with a H110 or H170 board for better value.
Overclocking an i3 isn't worth it.
You already noticed the parts were bought and in use, but could you clarify why you're choosing the H110 instead of the Z170?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next