F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems I wouldn't choose either if only available as floppy disks.

I wouldn't choose either if only available as floppy disks.

I wouldn't choose either if only available as floppy disks.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
E
Eitheer
Junior Member
31
11-25-2016, 12:28 AM
#1
I worked out the size of Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit as 3,545,472 KB. Each 3.5 floppy averaged about 1.44 MB, which means roughly 2,463 floppies would be needed. Some people prefer Windows 7, so I checked an estimate from the web—about 2,084 floppies. Would you go ahead and install it with that many disks?
E
Eitheer
11-25-2016, 12:28 AM #1

I worked out the size of Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit as 3,545,472 KB. Each 3.5 floppy averaged about 1.44 MB, which means roughly 2,463 floppies would be needed. Some people prefer Windows 7, so I checked an estimate from the web—about 2,084 floppies. Would you go ahead and install it with that many disks?

M
MR_MOOO2017
Junior Member
2
11-25-2016, 09:01 AM
#2
Producing all those floppies would cost much more than Windows itself. Additionally, Windows needs to be delivered as a single, unified image on a bootable medium—whether that’s a USB drive or an optical disc. You can’t break it down into small fragments.
M
MR_MOOO2017
11-25-2016, 09:01 AM #2

Producing all those floppies would cost much more than Windows itself. Additionally, Windows needs to be delivered as a single, unified image on a bootable medium—whether that’s a USB drive or an optical disc. You can’t break it down into small fragments.

S
sbeamer
Member
71
12-15-2016, 05:32 PM
#3
Absolutely treating this seriously. In reality, this scenario seems impossible, yet let's explore it creatively. It would cost just as much as making a single disk copy.
S
sbeamer
12-15-2016, 05:32 PM #3

Absolutely treating this seriously. In reality, this scenario seems impossible, yet let's explore it creatively. It would cost just as much as making a single disk copy.

D
David_PVP
Member
52
12-15-2016, 06:12 PM
#4
Believe me, setting up Windows using floppy disks isn't a pleasant experience (particularly when #1273 ends up damaged).
D
David_PVP
12-15-2016, 06:12 PM #4

Believe me, setting up Windows using floppy disks isn't a pleasant experience (particularly when #1273 ends up damaged).

S
Sahrend
Member
55
12-15-2016, 07:23 PM
#5
S
Sahrend
12-15-2016, 07:23 PM #5

P
predafight
Member
68
12-16-2016, 02:21 AM
#6
Absolutely not. Installing Windows 95 from a floppy drive was a lengthy and frustrating process. Regarding @Phentos, it is indeed feasible to do so, as programs were packaged and compiled by the installer during the installation phase.
P
predafight
12-16-2016, 02:21 AM #6

Absolutely not. Installing Windows 95 from a floppy drive was a lengthy and frustrating process. Regarding @Phentos, it is indeed feasible to do so, as programs were packaged and compiled by the installer during the installation phase.

F
Fungus12
Member
210
12-16-2016, 02:54 AM
#7
How many floppies were necessary for your model? The one used for final applications required 26. That was definitely a challenge.
F
Fungus12
12-16-2016, 02:54 AM #7

How many floppies were necessary for your model? The one used for final applications required 26. That was definitely a challenge.

B
BlackAvenuee
Junior Member
19
12-16-2016, 11:23 AM
#8
I recall setting up Windows 3.1 from floppy disks as well; it seems when Windows 95 launched I had a few options, though not a positive one... It was roughly around 32 discs of floppies for that version. Installation likely took 2 to 3 hours or more, possibly longer. Back then I disliked floppies (around 1994), even with a CD-ROM, because computing was really tough and waiting while things installed or wrote was super frustrating.
B
BlackAvenuee
12-16-2016, 11:23 AM #8

I recall setting up Windows 3.1 from floppy disks as well; it seems when Windows 95 launched I had a few options, though not a positive one... It was roughly around 32 discs of floppies for that version. Installation likely took 2 to 3 hours or more, possibly longer. Back then I disliked floppies (around 1994), even with a CD-ROM, because computing was really tough and waiting while things installed or wrote was super frustrating.

O
Okwrighty
Member
105
01-06-2017, 08:12 AM
#9
I won’t install them. I don’t need to handle 3,000 flopies in my room just for installing Windows. I’d prefer Vista or XP instead.
O
Okwrighty
01-06-2017, 08:12 AM #9

I won’t install them. I don’t need to handle 3,000 flopies in my room just for installing Windows. I’d prefer Vista or XP instead.

D
DrummerBS
Member
185
01-07-2017, 10:51 AM
#10
Vista appears significantly different and bigger than XP, possibly 20-30% less in size than Windows 7.
D
DrummerBS
01-07-2017, 10:51 AM #10

Vista appears significantly different and bigger than XP, possibly 20-30% less in size than Windows 7.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next