F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop I was at Wccftech attempting to start a thoughtful conversation...

I was at Wccftech attempting to start a thoughtful conversation...

I was at Wccftech attempting to start a thoughtful conversation...

N
NaiROolF
Senior Member
Find
685
10-14-2023, 02:39 PM
#1
The discussion centered on Intel’s approach of charging customers extra to access advanced CPU features. I noted concerns about ECC RAM being limited to server CPUs, while a commenter criticized Intel for this practice. My question is whether that was justified—should consumers demand such protections for their desktops? I rely on ECC RAM for data security on my server, so why not for personal use?
Reply
Reply
N
NaiROolF
10-14-2023, 02:39 PM #1

The discussion centered on Intel’s approach of charging customers extra to access advanced CPU features. I noted concerns about ECC RAM being limited to server CPUs, while a commenter criticized Intel for this practice. My question is whether that was justified—should consumers demand such protections for their desktops? I rely on ECC RAM for data security on my server, so why not for personal use?

Reply
Reply
T
tk66
Junior Member
Find
21
10-31-2023, 07:19 AM
#2
Just dismiss him. We view AMD's IMC as lacking in managing memory overclocks and high-capacity RAM that Intel CPUs can handle, which leads to more errors under consistent settings. He’s a misguided individual influenced by the Dunning-Kruger effect and a poor temperament, choosing to overlook many Linux-based services on smartphones because Windows is perceived as more reliable and performant.
Reply
Reply
T
tk66
10-31-2023, 07:19 AM #2

Just dismiss him. We view AMD's IMC as lacking in managing memory overclocks and high-capacity RAM that Intel CPUs can handle, which leads to more errors under consistent settings. He’s a misguided individual influenced by the Dunning-Kruger effect and a poor temperament, choosing to overlook many Linux-based services on smartphones because Windows is perceived as more reliable and performant.

Reply
Reply
R
raven_sing
Junior Member
Find
48
10-31-2023, 03:55 PM
#3
For the majority of users, adding ECC RAM is unnecessary unless you pay a significant premium. Most current RAM today performs adequately without it, and past issues have largely been resolved. Having it available would be useful, but at what expense? IMC already has limited capacity, so compromises are inevitable. I hope AMD improves their IMC in the future, though it’s not their worst performance. RAM above 3400-3600 MHz isn’t worth the declining benefits, and with DDR5 and AM5, prices for DDR5 won’t match DDR4 levels for a long time. I’d trade off ECC support if it meant longer motherboard lifespans. I wish Intel stopped making just one type of chip and focused on better solutions. It seems they’re prioritizing power over performance. This trend is becoming unmanageable.
Reply
Reply
R
raven_sing
10-31-2023, 03:55 PM #3

For the majority of users, adding ECC RAM is unnecessary unless you pay a significant premium. Most current RAM today performs adequately without it, and past issues have largely been resolved. Having it available would be useful, but at what expense? IMC already has limited capacity, so compromises are inevitable. I hope AMD improves their IMC in the future, though it’s not their worst performance. RAM above 3400-3600 MHz isn’t worth the declining benefits, and with DDR5 and AM5, prices for DDR5 won’t match DDR4 levels for a long time. I’d trade off ECC support if it meant longer motherboard lifespans. I wish Intel stopped making just one type of chip and focused on better solutions. It seems they’re prioritizing power over performance. This trend is becoming unmanageable.

Reply
Reply
X
xVeryn1337
Member
Find
229
10-31-2023, 04:18 PM
#4
Wccftech is a waste hub and I wasn't shocked by the forum's community vibe.
Reply
Reply
X
xVeryn1337
10-31-2023, 04:18 PM #4

Wccftech is a waste hub and I wasn't shocked by the forum's community vibe.

Reply
Reply
W
Wingman_41
Member
Find
223
10-31-2023, 06:31 PM
#5
It's normal to desire certain things. Accepting your emotions is part of being human. As a conscious buyer, I prefer non-ECC memory to support a 4000mhz Intel processor and maintain the performance of a gaming rig. A 128GB capacity would limit frequency even with ECC, making it a better option. This is especially useful for workstation setups that require high redundancy and multiple CPU sockets for optimal production.
Reply
Reply
W
Wingman_41
10-31-2023, 06:31 PM #5

It's normal to desire certain things. Accepting your emotions is part of being human. As a conscious buyer, I prefer non-ECC memory to support a 4000mhz Intel processor and maintain the performance of a gaming rig. A 128GB capacity would limit frequency even with ECC, making it a better option. This is especially useful for workstation setups that require high redundancy and multiple CPU sockets for optimal production.

Reply
Reply