F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop I shared my plans with my brother, who mentioned a Ryzen 3600. Is that accurate?

I shared my plans with my brother, who mentioned a Ryzen 3600. Is that accurate?

I shared my plans with my brother, who mentioned a Ryzen 3600. Is that accurate?

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
G
gerext
Member
124
06-19-2019, 03:35 PM
#11
Sure, I understand. Let's keep it clear.
G
gerext
06-19-2019, 03:35 PM #11

Sure, I understand. Let's keep it clear.

L
Likaelios
Junior Member
27
07-01-2019, 07:57 AM
#12
you don’t experience quad channel memory even with an i9. it’s unclear what the pricing looks like elsewhere, but i built a system for a friend and chose the i5 9600kf over the ryzen 3600/xt because it’s significantly more costly than the i5 9600k. i’m not sure about amd anymore. since the i5 9600kf performs better in most games, we opted for intel instead.
L
Likaelios
07-01-2019, 07:57 AM #12

you don’t experience quad channel memory even with an i9. it’s unclear what the pricing looks like elsewhere, but i built a system for a friend and chose the i5 9600kf over the ryzen 3600/xt because it’s significantly more costly than the i5 9600k. i’m not sure about amd anymore. since the i5 9600kf performs better in most games, we opted for intel instead.

E
Evolution88
Member
216
07-01-2019, 11:40 AM
#13
All reviewers agree the 3600 stands out as the top CPU in terms of performance and value. Intel’s built-in graphics aren’t suitable for gaming, so a dedicated GPU is essential. Your sibling likely misunderstands the marketing or has heard biased promotion. You’ll still get better results from Intel CPUs than most other options, except in specific single-thread scenarios. In general, the Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms others across most games and tasks. Always opt for dual-channel RAM—these processors perform best that way. If you can afford it, go with 3600 MHz; otherwise, stick to a B450 board, which may limit speed. It does differ, though—3200 MHz RAM remains a solid choice if you want to stretch your budget toward a better GPU. As for your brother’s logic… is he completely unaware, or is he trying to hinder your setup?
E
Evolution88
07-01-2019, 11:40 AM #13

All reviewers agree the 3600 stands out as the top CPU in terms of performance and value. Intel’s built-in graphics aren’t suitable for gaming, so a dedicated GPU is essential. Your sibling likely misunderstands the marketing or has heard biased promotion. You’ll still get better results from Intel CPUs than most other options, except in specific single-thread scenarios. In general, the Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms others across most games and tasks. Always opt for dual-channel RAM—these processors perform best that way. If you can afford it, go with 3600 MHz; otherwise, stick to a B450 board, which may limit speed. It does differ, though—3200 MHz RAM remains a solid choice if you want to stretch your budget toward a better GPU. As for your brother’s logic… is he completely unaware, or is he trying to hinder your setup?

A
Angeli4234
Member
158
07-01-2019, 03:19 PM
#14
A
Angeli4234
07-01-2019, 03:19 PM #14

T
tommie124
Member
199
07-01-2019, 11:45 PM
#15
That's not particularly innovative. When exploring newer releases, you'll notice they're incorporating more processing units than previous games. Gamers Nexus previously suggested i5 CPUs for gaming, but now they don't because creators are becoming more aware of cores. This direction seems to be heading in the same way going forward.
T
tommie124
07-01-2019, 11:45 PM #15

That's not particularly innovative. When exploring newer releases, you'll notice they're incorporating more processing units than previous games. Gamers Nexus previously suggested i5 CPUs for gaming, but now they don't because creators are becoming more aware of cores. This direction seems to be heading in the same way going forward.

J
jenc0x
Junior Member
7
07-02-2019, 10:24 PM
#16
I had a great time today! Here are all the points to consider when choosing the i5. You might want to think about buying an i9 or even an i7 if you can, but anything below that isn’t worth the effort. It’s on a struggling platform that lags behind competitors. If you’re a big Intel supporter, you probably shouldn’t switch to AMD just yet—wait until the 10th generation.
J
jenc0x
07-02-2019, 10:24 PM #16

I had a great time today! Here are all the points to consider when choosing the i5. You might want to think about buying an i9 or even an i7 if you can, but anything below that isn’t worth the effort. It’s on a struggling platform that lags behind competitors. If you’re a big Intel supporter, you probably shouldn’t switch to AMD just yet—wait until the 10th generation.

H
HaiassZ
Junior Member
46
07-02-2019, 11:19 PM
#17
You can upgrade to a solid GPU for better performance. Opt for fewer built-in features if you prefer more control. Avoid using a single-channel setup since it limits memory speed.
H
HaiassZ
07-02-2019, 11:19 PM #17

You can upgrade to a solid GPU for better performance. Opt for fewer built-in features if you prefer more control. Avoid using a single-channel setup since it limits memory speed.

B
Bigzwerg1998
Junior Member
11
07-03-2019, 12:12 AM
#18
Consider purchasing the Ryzen 2400G or 3400G. This setup includes both CPU and GPU, offering solid graphics performance. The newer 3400G is particularly worth it at about 140€, and it comes with a Wraith box cooler—make sure to factor that in.
B
Bigzwerg1998
07-03-2019, 12:12 AM #18

Consider purchasing the Ryzen 2400G or 3400G. This setup includes both CPU and GPU, offering solid graphics performance. The newer 3400G is particularly worth it at about 140€, and it comes with a Wraith box cooler—make sure to factor that in.

2
2befamezx3
Junior Member
47
07-04-2019, 03:10 PM
#19
My initial time playing games on a laptop with an i5 Intel built-in graphics was really bad, which made me lose interest in PC gaming for a while.
2
2befamezx3
07-04-2019, 03:10 PM #19

My initial time playing games on a laptop with an i5 Intel built-in graphics was really bad, which made me lose interest in PC gaming for a while.

M
misiek93
Member
182
07-10-2019, 01:24 PM
#20
I don't understand why you're asking that. Yes, it's possible to assemble a functional computer with fewer components, but PCs are investments that last several years. Therefore, it makes sense to allocate a reasonable amount if you can. We're also unsure whether the $1000 refers only to parts or includes everything. If it's just for parts, then it's quite reasonable, but if he needs to purchase a monitor, peripherals, a case, power supply, etc., then the budget for the actual hardware—like CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD, possibly HDD and MOBO—becomes much smaller. Even in that case, $1000 isn't exactly a budget suitable for a high-quality PC built by someone who isn't enthusiastic or wealthy.
M
misiek93
07-10-2019, 01:24 PM #20

I don't understand why you're asking that. Yes, it's possible to assemble a functional computer with fewer components, but PCs are investments that last several years. Therefore, it makes sense to allocate a reasonable amount if you can. We're also unsure whether the $1000 refers only to parts or includes everything. If it's just for parts, then it's quite reasonable, but if he needs to purchase a monitor, peripherals, a case, power supply, etc., then the budget for the actual hardware—like CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD, possibly HDD and MOBO—becomes much smaller. Even in that case, $1000 isn't exactly a budget suitable for a high-quality PC built by someone who isn't enthusiastic or wealthy.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next