F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming I played a 2005 AAA title on a 1.1Ghz Celeron laptop and was amazed.

I played a 2005 AAA title on a 1.1Ghz Celeron laptop and was amazed.

I played a 2005 AAA title on a 1.1Ghz Celeron laptop and was amazed.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
Monkeyroos04
Member
131
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#1
She needed a simple laptop for her youngest sister. It was basic, with features like YouTube, Netflix, and Microsoft Word. I searched Ebay and picked one called the 'ONDA Oliver 15.6'. It arrived almost new in five days, still in its original box with the manual and power adapter. I wasn’t expecting much, but it fit her budget at $149. It came with Windows 10 Home. The outside looked brand new, which was a good surprise. Performance was weak, especially with the 1080p screen—so I adjusted the desktop to 1280x720 for better results. Overall it worked fine enough for what she wanted. What stood out was its ability to run older AAA titles. I tested it on Painkiller: Black Edition; at 720p it ran smoothly, and in scenes with many creatures it hit 25-32 frames per second, while quieter moments reached up to 50 fps.
M
Monkeyroos04
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #1

She needed a simple laptop for her youngest sister. It was basic, with features like YouTube, Netflix, and Microsoft Word. I searched Ebay and picked one called the 'ONDA Oliver 15.6'. It arrived almost new in five days, still in its original box with the manual and power adapter. I wasn’t expecting much, but it fit her budget at $149. It came with Windows 10 Home. The outside looked brand new, which was a good surprise. Performance was weak, especially with the 1080p screen—so I adjusted the desktop to 1280x720 for better results. Overall it worked fine enough for what she wanted. What stood out was its ability to run older AAA titles. I tested it on Painkiller: Black Edition; at 720p it ran smoothly, and in scenes with many creatures it hit 25-32 frames per second, while quieter moments reached up to 50 fps.

J
Je2Carte
Junior Member
41
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#2
It seems the CPU is significantly faster than the latest Pentium 4 from 2005, which should handle those games smoothly. The processor is just a bit quicker than the Q6600, so upgrading to Crysis should work well.
J
Je2Carte
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #2

It seems the CPU is significantly faster than the latest Pentium 4 from 2005, which should handle those games smoothly. The processor is just a bit quicker than the Q6600, so upgrading to Crysis should work well.

W
WaterLily2003
Senior Member
648
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#3
What really caught my attention more than the CPU was the built-in HD 500 (which is integrated, and it’s also one of the weaker iGPUs since 2015). I know 2005 is a long time ago, but it still surprised me a bit.
W
WaterLily2003
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #3

What really caught my attention more than the CPU was the built-in HD 500 (which is integrated, and it’s also one of the weaker iGPUs since 2015). I know 2005 is a long time ago, but it still surprised me a bit.

J
jjmonkey13
Member
236
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#4
Taking into account those titles were built for DirectX 8 systems that had just 32-64MB of UMA, it makes sense why they worked well with limited resources. What would be unexpected is realizing these consoles and PCs could handle them with such minimal memory and RAM. It's even more impressive than today's machines running them smoothly. The original PlayStation managed just 2MB of RAM and 1MB of VRAM while still playing Grand Tourist 2.
J
jjmonkey13
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #4

Taking into account those titles were built for DirectX 8 systems that had just 32-64MB of UMA, it makes sense why they worked well with limited resources. What would be unexpected is realizing these consoles and PCs could handle them with such minimal memory and RAM. It's even more impressive than today's machines running them smoothly. The original PlayStation managed just 2MB of RAM and 1MB of VRAM while still playing Grand Tourist 2.

F
farid422
Junior Member
15
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#5
Absolutely, right? Back when we played TES III with just 256MB of RAM and a single-core Pentium IV, the monitor felt much bulkier than the machine itself—those classic CRT screens were definitely heavy!
F
farid422
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #5

Absolutely, right? Back when we played TES III with just 256MB of RAM and a single-core Pentium IV, the monitor felt much bulkier than the machine itself—those classic CRT screens were definitely heavy!

N
NaYkiFun_PvP
Junior Member
13
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#6
A used third or fourth generation i5 laptop at the same price will easily outpace that slow celeron. I don’t really understand why you’d choose a new celeron, but I’m wondering what it feels like to use one of those older models. My dad’s Craptop with an n4000 dual-core processor struggled to handle 720p video smoothly and took ages to open programs—far slower than his old Atom N450 netbook.
N
NaYkiFun_PvP
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #6

A used third or fourth generation i5 laptop at the same price will easily outpace that slow celeron. I don’t really understand why you’d choose a new celeron, but I’m wondering what it feels like to use one of those older models. My dad’s Craptop with an n4000 dual-core processor struggled to handle 720p video smoothly and took ages to open programs—far slower than his old Atom N450 netbook.

A
azagale
Junior Member
38
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#7
A
azagale
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #7

B
baconandfries
Member
215
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#8
B
baconandfries
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #8

U
Uvaron
Member
61
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#9
If possible, return it right away because these celerons are really slow. For better battery life, consider used 6th or 7th generation i3 laptops. To boost performance, a 4th generation i5 works well since you can upgrade its BIOS for maximum speed on allcores.
U
Uvaron
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #9

If possible, return it right away because these celerons are really slow. For better battery life, consider used 6th or 7th generation i3 laptops. To boost performance, a 4th generation i5 works well since you can upgrade its BIOS for maximum speed on allcores.

C
choppchopp
Member
156
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM
#10
You don’t have to install a BIOS mod; ThrottleStop handles it automatically in Windows.
C
choppchopp
07-22-2018, 06:15 AM #10

You don’t have to install a BIOS mod; ThrottleStop handles it automatically in Windows.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next