I can assist with demonstrating why relying on unsupported operating systems increases risk.
I can assist with demonstrating why relying on unsupported operating systems increases risk.
I need something to demonstrate the risks of running on an old operating system. It's clear they won't just release updates easily, especially not without addressing serious issues like WannaCry. People should understand the dangers involved.
The decision to halt security patches for older operating systems is sufficient on its own
He insists on saying “I’m good with older OS,” but this doesn’t shield him from security risks that are unlikely to receive updates. The best approach remains staying offline or keeping software current.
Various references can convey the same idea using different phrasing. Some may dismiss these sources as lacking depth. Here are a couple of examples: https://www.thewindowsclub.com/windows-xp-end-of-life and https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/wind...c79ee6ef5e XP is no longer supported. Unless you're spending excessive amounts to maintain it, it poses a security risk. Those who refuse to accept this view won't change their position even after being convinced by official sources like Microsoft.
I'm focusing on Windows 7 mainly—I wonder if you meant to add that too?
He keeps insisting it’s not the end of life and still receives help, while you can obtain enterprise updates for free (he’s just simple-minded).
The information provided pertains to any software that has reached end-of-life, regardless of operating system or platform. The details about Microsoft's EOL for Windows 7 are essentially identical to those for XP, with no more security updates available.