F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks I already own an ISP router and a few others.

I already own an ISP router and a few others.

I already own an ISP router and a few others.

A
Asssure
Member
56
11-09-2016, 11:27 PM
#1
HT-178AX-V2 router has a poor interface with minimal documentation for the ax4400 RT-AX57 model. The main cable port connects to the fiber connection, but performance is inconsistent.
A
Asssure
11-09-2016, 11:27 PM #1

HT-178AX-V2 router has a poor interface with minimal documentation for the ax4400 RT-AX57 model. The main cable port connects to the fiber connection, but performance is inconsistent.

I
itacarambi
Member
189
11-11-2016, 01:48 PM
#2
Is the ISP box a router or gateway (modem/router)? Most ISPs rely on gateways. For fiber connections, you'll also need a media converter—also called an ONT/ONU, which is similar to a modem—and then a router. Regarding this, reach out to your ISP to confirm compatibility. I have coaxial internet and my provider offers a selection of compatible modems and gateways; using something not listed isn't recommended. Gateways often provide weak Wi-Fi because they handle both modem and media conversion tasks. I favor separate devices for better performance.
I
itacarambi
11-11-2016, 01:48 PM #2

Is the ISP box a router or gateway (modem/router)? Most ISPs rely on gateways. For fiber connections, you'll also need a media converter—also called an ONT/ONU, which is similar to a modem—and then a router. Regarding this, reach out to your ISP to confirm compatibility. I have coaxial internet and my provider offers a selection of compatible modems and gateways; using something not listed isn't recommended. Gateways often provide weak Wi-Fi because they handle both modem and media conversion tasks. I favor separate devices for better performance.

B
Browen1000
Member
224
11-11-2016, 06:19 PM
#3
The device includes an ON with a RJ45 port.
B
Browen1000
11-11-2016, 06:19 PM #3

The device includes an ON with a RJ45 port.

S
Squidney916
Member
60
11-13-2016, 03:54 PM
#4
Well then any router should suffice. The main factor is the speed you’re willing to pay for. Once you reach Gigabit and higher, there are fewer choices since you need a model capable of handling NAT at those rates. RTINGS.com offers router reviews, which is quite helpful. Looking at the models you mentioned, the TP Link appears to score well overall. The ASUS model is noted for not supporting DFS channels on 5GHz bands. Personally, I own the Synology RT2600AC, which has been excellent. They have a newer version that supports WiFi 6, though I’m unsure of its exact speed rating—my connection tops out around 850 Mbps. The software is impressive and user-friendly, packed with features.
S
Squidney916
11-13-2016, 03:54 PM #4

Well then any router should suffice. The main factor is the speed you’re willing to pay for. Once you reach Gigabit and higher, there are fewer choices since you need a model capable of handling NAT at those rates. RTINGS.com offers router reviews, which is quite helpful. Looking at the models you mentioned, the TP Link appears to score well overall. The ASUS model is noted for not supporting DFS channels on 5GHz bands. Personally, I own the Synology RT2600AC, which has been excellent. They have a newer version that supports WiFi 6, though I’m unsure of its exact speed rating—my connection tops out around 850 Mbps. The software is impressive and user-friendly, packed with features.

D
dannypl
Member
135
11-13-2016, 05:49 PM
#5
you can find the dfs ref in the isp section, though i’m not sure about that part. the isp version was included free of charge, but the advanced settings are only available in the browser. the ui looks really dated—late 90s and early 2000s feel better than what’s here. among the three options, the tp link seems to be the best. the port on the asus one is still problematic. i was using that before the tp link version.
D
dannypl
11-13-2016, 05:49 PM #5

you can find the dfs ref in the isp section, though i’m not sure about that part. the isp version was included free of charge, but the advanced settings are only available in the browser. the ui looks really dated—late 90s and early 2000s feel better than what’s here. among the three options, the tp link seems to be the best. the port on the asus one is still problematic. i was using that before the tp link version.

J
JustGame211
Member
59
11-13-2016, 07:37 PM
#6
It was listed on RTINGS.com because of that. All DFS channels operate within the 5GHz spectrum shared with radar systems. For a router to support DFS, it needs additional government approvals. In the US, this would be handled by the FCC. This ensures compliance with regulations—since if the device detects radar activity, it will block access to those channels. The main concern arises in densely populated areas like apartment buildings, where non-DFS channels might get overloaded. Some manufacturers avoid these extra certifications and therefore don’t support DFS channels.
J
JustGame211
11-13-2016, 07:37 PM #6

It was listed on RTINGS.com because of that. All DFS channels operate within the 5GHz spectrum shared with radar systems. For a router to support DFS, it needs additional government approvals. In the US, this would be handled by the FCC. This ensures compliance with regulations—since if the device detects radar activity, it will block access to those channels. The main concern arises in densely populated areas like apartment buildings, where non-DFS channels might get overloaded. Some manufacturers avoid these extra certifications and therefore don’t support DFS channels.

T
TotalGamer144
Member
180
11-14-2016, 01:13 AM
#7
Understood. I see now. The reference was interpreted differently than intended.
T
TotalGamer144
11-14-2016, 01:13 AM #7

Understood. I see now. The reference was interpreted differently than intended.