F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming How this system performs?

How this system performs?

How this system performs?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
D
doc_boom
Member
51
10-31-2016, 10:01 PM
#1
I notice many people build PCs using e8400 or e8500 components for YouTube videos. Common parts include the GIGABYTE GTX 750 with 2GB 128Bit GDDR5, Zebronics motherboard ZEB-G31 with socket 775, and two 2GB DDR-2 667 MHz PCs. Is it really a good value for the price? Does it perform well for gaming?
D
doc_boom
10-31-2016, 10:01 PM #1

I notice many people build PCs using e8400 or e8500 components for YouTube videos. Common parts include the GIGABYTE GTX 750 with 2GB 128Bit GDDR5, Zebronics motherboard ZEB-G31 with socket 775, and two 2GB DDR-2 667 MHz PCs. Is it really a good value for the price? Does it perform well for gaming?

A
152
11-07-2016, 10:03 AM
#2
You wouldn't get this. But what's the price for it?
A
AgentDarkJewel
11-07-2016, 10:03 AM #2

You wouldn't get this. But what's the price for it?

J
Jes987
Junior Member
48
11-14-2016, 07:51 PM
#3
Price ≠ Value
It's surprisingly affordable and should handle older or lighter games smoothly with a reasonable setting under 1080p at 30+ fps, though it falls short for most of the latest major AAA games.
J
Jes987
11-14-2016, 07:51 PM #3

Price ≠ Value
It's surprisingly affordable and should handle older or lighter games smoothly with a reasonable setting under 1080p at 30+ fps, though it falls short for most of the latest major AAA games.

R
rsrs12
Junior Member
33
11-14-2016, 09:31 PM
#4
I think it will hit the limits of Undertale. And if you're fortunate, you could run Minecraft at the smallest render distance and achieve a full 60 FPS once Optifine is installed. Or increase the render distance and hit a cinematic 20 FPS. The options are endless.
Alternatively, you might like games such as Sid Meier's Civilization V, which won awards. Challenge your opponents while the game challenges your CPU in this timeless strategy title.
However, honestly, even if it's very affordable, if it can't perform the core function you designed for, it's not worth the effort. Consider trying Sandy Bridge, or if you need a 775 board, opt for a Core 2 Quad.
R
rsrs12
11-14-2016, 09:31 PM #4

I think it will hit the limits of Undertale. And if you're fortunate, you could run Minecraft at the smallest render distance and achieve a full 60 FPS once Optifine is installed. Or increase the render distance and hit a cinematic 20 FPS. The options are endless.
Alternatively, you might like games such as Sid Meier's Civilization V, which won awards. Challenge your opponents while the game challenges your CPU in this timeless strategy title.
However, honestly, even if it's very affordable, if it can't perform the core function you designed for, it's not worth the effort. Consider trying Sandy Bridge, or if you need a 775 board, opt for a Core 2 Quad.

M
mayawaya11
Member
116
11-16-2016, 10:39 AM
#5
Core 2 quad is certainly a better option. However, I'm curious—does it really perform well? I believe it's suitable for work. But games typically rely on one core instead of multiple cores. Between the Core 2 Quad and the E8500, which one excels in single-core performance? (Please let me know if I'm mistaken)
M
mayawaya11
11-16-2016, 10:39 AM #5

Core 2 quad is certainly a better option. However, I'm curious—does it really perform well? I believe it's suitable for work. But games typically rely on one core instead of multiple cores. Between the Core 2 Quad and the E8500, which one excels in single-core performance? (Please let me know if I'm mistaken)

B
Boxygirl2
Member
85
11-22-2016, 09:02 AM
#6
I don't get it, what do you mean?
B
Boxygirl2
11-22-2016, 09:02 AM #6

I don't get it, what do you mean?

D
DarklyThunder
Member
241
11-22-2016, 10:35 AM
#7
This might have been accurate over a decade ago. Today's games often utilize multiple cores. As technology has advanced, software has been created to make the most of these improvements. A single-core performance is no longer the only standard. The E8500 remains a viable option, though its two-core setup may struggle with newer titles. It also runs alongside the operating system in the background. The Core 2 Quad might offer slightly lower averages but better minimum performance, or simply higher overall averages and minimums based on the game. If you need smooth gameplay, choose the E8500. However, for consistent and satisfying performance, consider adding more cores and increasing RAM.
D
DarklyThunder
11-22-2016, 10:35 AM #7

This might have been accurate over a decade ago. Today's games often utilize multiple cores. As technology has advanced, software has been created to make the most of these improvements. A single-core performance is no longer the only standard. The E8500 remains a viable option, though its two-core setup may struggle with newer titles. It also runs alongside the operating system in the background. The Core 2 Quad might offer slightly lower averages but better minimum performance, or simply higher overall averages and minimums based on the game. If you need smooth gameplay, choose the E8500. However, for consistent and satisfying performance, consider adding more cores and increasing RAM.

G
GOLD_Kenny
Member
112
11-22-2016, 07:32 PM
#8
Considering the Xeon e5430, it features 4 cores with 4 threads each, running at a clock speed of 2.667 GHz, with a 12MB cache and a TDP of 80 watts. The Core2Quad Q9400 matches with these specifications, offering 4 cores, 4 threads per core, a clock speed of 2.667 GHz, a 6MB cache, and a TDP of 95 watts.
G
GOLD_Kenny
11-22-2016, 07:32 PM #8

Considering the Xeon e5430, it features 4 cores with 4 threads each, running at a clock speed of 2.667 GHz, with a 12MB cache and a TDP of 80 watts. The Core2Quad Q9400 matches with these specifications, offering 4 cores, 4 threads per core, a clock speed of 2.667 GHz, a 6MB cache, and a TDP of 95 watts.

B
blackbird1129
Junior Member
10
11-22-2016, 08:38 PM
#9
Begin expelling dough. Today's computers have advanced significantly; even a basic modern device will surpass an older, used model from a decade prior.
B
blackbird1129
11-22-2016, 08:38 PM #9

Begin expelling dough. Today's computers have advanced significantly; even a basic modern device will surpass an older, used model from a decade prior.

L
lupohan
Junior Member
13
11-23-2016, 02:52 AM
#10
I understand how far modern computers have advanced. I'm not making comparisons between old and new. What I'm looking for is to see what's achievable on a limited budget.
L
lupohan
11-23-2016, 02:52 AM #10

I understand how far modern computers have advanced. I'm not making comparisons between old and new. What I'm looking for is to see what's achievable on a limited budget.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next