F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop How much performance can be gained by increasing the clock speed of a Ryzen 5 2600x?

How much performance can be gained by increasing the clock speed of a Ryzen 5 2600x?

How much performance can be gained by increasing the clock speed of a Ryzen 5 2600x?

O
OlaPedro
Junior Member
48
10-03-2018, 06:25 PM
#1
I purchased a Ryzen 5 2600x and I'm using an MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX. How much potential do you think there is for overclocking?
O
OlaPedro
10-03-2018, 06:25 PM #1

I purchased a Ryzen 5 2600x and I'm using an MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX. How much potential do you think there is for overclocking?

M
Mystic4Life
Junior Member
32
10-03-2018, 07:45 PM
#2
Closely to the limit of functionality.
Each processor has minor variations.
Overclocking no longer provides the same powerful enhancement.
M
Mystic4Life
10-03-2018, 07:45 PM #2

Closely to the limit of functionality.
Each processor has minor variations.
Overclocking no longer provides the same powerful enhancement.

M
Mastera616
Member
163
10-03-2018, 09:37 PM
#3
You'd likely be wiser to choose an X470 motherboard, but if you're committed to pushing your 2600X to higher speeds on a B450M, consult the available guides:-
https://thetechnoninja.com/technology/ho...n-5-2600x/
Focus especially on this part (to ensure your 2600X can handle the strain).
Ryzen 2600X VDDCR Core Volts
This section covers overclocking, and the same voltage works for both the 2600 and 2600X. Remember to preserve voltage for regular operation. Most experts suggest around 1.38V for stable performance. Your current setup is at 1.40V, but some users have noted issues when exceeding this level. Using higher voltages may yield short-term gains with adequate cooling, allowing you to test and record results.
TLDR: stay under 1.38V.
You could achieve a steady all-core boost to about 4.0GHz around 1.30V, but stop there. Going beyond risks failure—your CPU might stop working entirely.
An overclock to 4.0GHz represents only a slight increase (11%) over the stock 3.6GHz for this model. In optimal conditions with the correct board and a high-performance CPU, you might hit 4.2GHz—a 16.7% improvement.
I left my 2600X at its default settings, except for an XMP 3000MT/s boost on the RAM.
For much greater performance, consider upgrading to a more capable chipset:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/u8...0x3d5900x/
M
Mastera616
10-03-2018, 09:37 PM #3

You'd likely be wiser to choose an X470 motherboard, but if you're committed to pushing your 2600X to higher speeds on a B450M, consult the available guides:-
https://thetechnoninja.com/technology/ho...n-5-2600x/
Focus especially on this part (to ensure your 2600X can handle the strain).
Ryzen 2600X VDDCR Core Volts
This section covers overclocking, and the same voltage works for both the 2600 and 2600X. Remember to preserve voltage for regular operation. Most experts suggest around 1.38V for stable performance. Your current setup is at 1.40V, but some users have noted issues when exceeding this level. Using higher voltages may yield short-term gains with adequate cooling, allowing you to test and record results.
TLDR: stay under 1.38V.
You could achieve a steady all-core boost to about 4.0GHz around 1.30V, but stop there. Going beyond risks failure—your CPU might stop working entirely.
An overclock to 4.0GHz represents only a slight increase (11%) over the stock 3.6GHz for this model. In optimal conditions with the correct board and a high-performance CPU, you might hit 4.2GHz—a 16.7% improvement.
I left my 2600X at its default settings, except for an XMP 3000MT/s boost on the RAM.
For much greater performance, consider upgrading to a more capable chipset:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/u8...0x3d5900x/

T
The_Politician
Junior Member
17
10-20-2018, 03:31 AM
#4
Thank you, it's good to know you've already purchased everything. Your feedback is really appreciated.
T
The_Politician
10-20-2018, 03:31 AM #4

Thank you, it's good to know you've already purchased everything. Your feedback is really appreciated.

C
CatboyLegend
Junior Member
36
10-23-2018, 06:50 AM
#5
Being a former owner, 1.35v is the most secure voltage to avoid. Going higher isn't beneficial.
C
CatboyLegend
10-23-2018, 06:50 AM #5

Being a former owner, 1.35v is the most secure voltage to avoid. Going higher isn't beneficial.

H
Hypersnake
Member
208
10-23-2018, 08:21 AM
#6
I keep my 2600X around 1.25V to stay safe. It gives a slight boost but nothing impressive. I don’t push my 3800X or 7950X beyond normal limits.
I tried an Athlon II X4 620 with a strong overclock, but after six years it failed due to electromigration—frequency had to drop. Still functional for a while.
If you’re buying a used 2600X, you can’t tell if previous owners abused it. Running it at 1.35V or higher might have worn it out.
A brand new 2600X in a sealed box with no use could let you try higher voltages.
The voltage you apply depends on how long you plan to run the CPU. You can push it to 1.40V+ for months and risk damage, or lower it for steadier performance. Your decision is yours.
H
Hypersnake
10-23-2018, 08:21 AM #6

I keep my 2600X around 1.25V to stay safe. It gives a slight boost but nothing impressive. I don’t push my 3800X or 7950X beyond normal limits.
I tried an Athlon II X4 620 with a strong overclock, but after six years it failed due to electromigration—frequency had to drop. Still functional for a while.
If you’re buying a used 2600X, you can’t tell if previous owners abused it. Running it at 1.35V or higher might have worn it out.
A brand new 2600X in a sealed box with no use could let you try higher voltages.
The voltage you apply depends on how long you plan to run the CPU. You can push it to 1.40V+ for months and risk damage, or lower it for steadier performance. Your decision is yours.

C
chayden2k6
Member
119
10-30-2018, 04:08 PM
#7
Hey there,
For that CPU, PBO is the better choice. Manual overclocking isn't very effective unless you have an excellent cooler to boost the CPUI. Even then, it doesn't significantly improve FPS during games.
C
chayden2k6
10-30-2018, 04:08 PM #7

Hey there,
For that CPU, PBO is the better choice. Manual overclocking isn't very effective unless you have an excellent cooler to boost the CPUI. Even then, it doesn't significantly improve FPS during games.

C
cal_gamer10
Member
105
11-15-2018, 02:26 AM
#8
The clocking technique isn't as effective as it once was. You won't achieve the same improvements as with a 4790K that could be overclocked for another two years. Instead, consider PBO and see where it takes you, since manual adjustments won't significantly boost performance.
C
cal_gamer10
11-15-2018, 02:26 AM #8

The clocking technique isn't as effective as it once was. You won't achieve the same improvements as with a 4790K that could be overclocked for another two years. Instead, consider PBO and see where it takes you, since manual adjustments won't significantly boost performance.

B
bleachify
Junior Member
10
11-15-2018, 05:20 AM
#9
Mines were purchased with a new setup and placed on a limited power schedule for most of its lifespan. I maintained a steady 1.3v and 1.35v at maximum, never exceeding those levels, and it continues to function properly.
B
bleachify
11-15-2018, 05:20 AM #9

Mines were purchased with a new setup and placed on a limited power schedule for most of its lifespan. I maintained a steady 1.3v and 1.35v at maximum, never exceeding those levels, and it continues to function properly.