F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking How impressive is this original character creation for a low-budget MOBO?

How impressive is this original character creation for a low-budget MOBO?

How impressive is this original character creation for a low-budget MOBO?

F
fire_dummy
Junior Member
12
04-13-2016, 05:21 AM
#1
My friend required a fast overclock for his system. I’m not very familiar with AMD products. He increased the CPU speed to a consistent 4.40GHz with a voltage of 1.4 volts using an 212 EVO processor, which operates at around 46°C during heavy use. The multicore performance reached 702 points in Cinebench. He also has a R9 380 GPU. I adjusted the clock speeds to 1150 MHz for the CPU and 1643 MHz for the GPU. Under load, the GPU maintained a temperature of about 74°C and idled at roughly 36°C.

These results seem reasonable for AMD hardware on this motherboard?
http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product...id=5195#ov

Can I further enhance his CPU performance?
Specifications:
CPU: AMD FX-8320 Vishera 8-Core at 3.5 GHz (4.0 GHz Turbo) with an OC of 4.4GHz
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO
GPU: MSI Radeon R9 380 4GD5T OC 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 (OC at 1150MHz, 1500Mhz memory)
Case: NZXT Phantom 240 Orange Flame Edition
Ram: ADATA XPG V1.0 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3
MOBO: Gigabyte Ultra Durable 4 Classic GA-78LMT-USB3 Desktop Motherboard
PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer MK III 1200W 80Plus Platinum
HDD: WD Blue 1TB Desktop Hard Disk Drive – 7200 RPM SATA 6 Gb/s, 64MB cache
Additional Drives: (2) WESTERN DIGITAL 160GB 7200RPM SATA-II, 8MB cache
SSD Boot Drive: SanDisk 2.5" 128GB SATA III SDSSDP-128G-G25
OS: Windows 10 Home
F
fire_dummy
04-13-2016, 05:21 AM #1

My friend required a fast overclock for his system. I’m not very familiar with AMD products. He increased the CPU speed to a consistent 4.40GHz with a voltage of 1.4 volts using an 212 EVO processor, which operates at around 46°C during heavy use. The multicore performance reached 702 points in Cinebench. He also has a R9 380 GPU. I adjusted the clock speeds to 1150 MHz for the CPU and 1643 MHz for the GPU. Under load, the GPU maintained a temperature of about 74°C and idled at roughly 36°C.

These results seem reasonable for AMD hardware on this motherboard?
http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product...id=5195#ov

Can I further enhance his CPU performance?
Specifications:
CPU: AMD FX-8320 Vishera 8-Core at 3.5 GHz (4.0 GHz Turbo) with an OC of 4.4GHz
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO
GPU: MSI Radeon R9 380 4GD5T OC 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 (OC at 1150MHz, 1500Mhz memory)
Case: NZXT Phantom 240 Orange Flame Edition
Ram: ADATA XPG V1.0 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3
MOBO: Gigabyte Ultra Durable 4 Classic GA-78LMT-USB3 Desktop Motherboard
PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer MK III 1200W 80Plus Platinum
HDD: WD Blue 1TB Desktop Hard Disk Drive – 7200 RPM SATA 6 Gb/s, 64MB cache
Additional Drives: (2) WESTERN DIGITAL 160GB 7200RPM SATA-II, 8MB cache
SSD Boot Drive: SanDisk 2.5" 128GB SATA III SDSSDP-128G-G25
OS: Windows 10 Home

D
Dustbringer
Junior Member
11
04-14-2016, 09:55 AM
#2
IceBergs :
Got it.
I am going to suggest buying a new board. DO you think this is a nice solution AND he would finally be getting SATA 3.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6813130922
That board also appears to be a 4+1 stage. 8+2 is a bit pricier, but will honestly be much safer.
This board
seems to be 8+2, and is priced well. It can be found for less on other websites though.
Some motherboards should have 6+2, which would be better than 4+1 and cheaper than 8+2, but I couldn't find any.
D
Dustbringer
04-14-2016, 09:55 AM #2

IceBergs :
Got it.
I am going to suggest buying a new board. DO you think this is a nice solution AND he would finally be getting SATA 3.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6813130922
That board also appears to be a 4+1 stage. 8+2 is a bit pricier, but will honestly be much safer.
This board
seems to be 8+2, and is priced well. It can be found for less on other websites though.
Some motherboards should have 6+2, which would be better than 4+1 and cheaper than 8+2, but I couldn't find any.

P
PeehLine
Junior Member
10
04-16-2016, 10:19 AM
#3
it's on a board that barely supports the FX, using the 760G chipset might harm your board. it also only provides a 4+1 power phase, so you'll need an 8+2 for a 125w chip OC.
P
PeehLine
04-16-2016, 10:19 AM #3

it's on a board that barely supports the FX, using the 760G chipset might harm your board. it also only provides a 4+1 power phase, so you'll need an 8+2 for a 125w chip OC.

A
AM72
Member
76
04-16-2016, 01:31 PM
#4
That mobo only has a 4+1 phase on it. I'm honestly not sure I would overclock it at all, due to the high power usage of the 8320.
Numbers wise though that's pretty good, it's just that it might melt.
A
AM72
04-16-2016, 01:31 PM #4

That mobo only has a 4+1 phase on it. I'm honestly not sure I would overclock it at all, due to the high power usage of the 8320.
Numbers wise though that's pretty good, it's just that it might melt.

I
Inf3rno
Member
186
04-16-2016, 05:41 PM
#5
icraft :
That mobo only has a 4+1 phase on it. I'm honestly not sure I would overclock it at all, due to the high power usage of the 8320.
Numbers wise though that's pretty good, it's just that it might melt.
Got it.
I am going to suggest buying a new board. DO you think this is a nice solution AND he would finally be getting SATA 3.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6813130922
I
Inf3rno
04-16-2016, 05:41 PM #5

icraft :
That mobo only has a 4+1 phase on it. I'm honestly not sure I would overclock it at all, due to the high power usage of the 8320.
Numbers wise though that's pretty good, it's just that it might melt.
Got it.
I am going to suggest buying a new board. DO you think this is a nice solution AND he would finally be getting SATA 3.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6813130922

X
Xo_PVP_Girl_oX
Senior Member
500
04-16-2016, 06:41 PM
#6
Avoid Msi Mobo, opt for Asus Gigabyte or Asrock
X
Xo_PVP_Girl_oX
04-16-2016, 06:41 PM #6

Avoid Msi Mobo, opt for Asus Gigabyte or Asrock

H
hd2d3d
Member
214
04-20-2016, 03:36 PM
#7
IceBergs :
Got it.
I am going to suggest buying a new board. DO you think this is a nice solution AND he would finally be getting SATA 3.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6813130922
That board also appears to be a 4+1 stage. 8+2 is a bit pricier, but will honestly be much safer.
This board
seems to be 8+2, and is priced well. It can be found for less on other websites though.
Some motherboards should have 6+2, which would be better than 4+1 and cheaper than 8+2, but I couldn't find any.
H
hd2d3d
04-20-2016, 03:36 PM #7

IceBergs :
Got it.
I am going to suggest buying a new board. DO you think this is a nice solution AND he would finally be getting SATA 3.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6813130922
That board also appears to be a 4+1 stage. 8+2 is a bit pricier, but will honestly be much safer.
This board
seems to be 8+2, and is priced well. It can be found for less on other websites though.
Some motherboards should have 6+2, which would be better than 4+1 and cheaper than 8+2, but I couldn't find any.