F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking How do I Overclock the FSB?

How do I Overclock the FSB?

How do I Overclock the FSB?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
J
JokerFame
Senior Member
670
11-04-2016, 07:26 AM
#1
Hi guys,
How can I boost the FSB speed? I'm using Readyboost on RAMDisk and want to try increasing its load performance. My setup is:
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3
CPU: AMD FX-4350
GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 970
J
JokerFame
11-04-2016, 07:26 AM #1

Hi guys,
How can I boost the FSB speed? I'm using Readyboost on RAMDisk and want to try increasing its load performance. My setup is:
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3
CPU: AMD FX-4350
GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 970

B
BadAtCosmic
Junior Member
45
11-05-2016, 08:04 PM
#2
The front side bus (FSB) is now referred to as the Base Clock. I do not suggest overclocking this, as it could cause the main bus to be overclocked, affecting all devices on the motherboard such as RAM and bridges. This technique is only applicable to older systems that lacked CPU multipliers support. If you decide to proceed, you must adjust your RAM voltages and uncores to ensure stability. It is quite challenging to overclock this method because it's impossible to guarantee which components are unstable.

Why would you opt for a FSB overclock instead of a CPU multiplier overclock?
If your goal is to boost the memory speed, using an XMP profile would be more appropriate—it’s a reliable method for RAM overclocking. Otherwise, adjusting the memory clock and voltages will be necessary.
B
BadAtCosmic
11-05-2016, 08:04 PM #2

The front side bus (FSB) is now referred to as the Base Clock. I do not suggest overclocking this, as it could cause the main bus to be overclocked, affecting all devices on the motherboard such as RAM and bridges. This technique is only applicable to older systems that lacked CPU multipliers support. If you decide to proceed, you must adjust your RAM voltages and uncores to ensure stability. It is quite challenging to overclock this method because it's impossible to guarantee which components are unstable.

Why would you opt for a FSB overclock instead of a CPU multiplier overclock?
If your goal is to boost the memory speed, using an XMP profile would be more appropriate—it’s a reliable method for RAM overclocking. Otherwise, adjusting the memory clock and voltages will be necessary.

I
ImSquirrel
Junior Member
10
11-09-2016, 02:51 PM
#3
JimF_35 explains that the front side bus is now referred to as the Base Clock (BLCK). He advises against overclocking it, as this could affect the main bus and cause instability across all devices like RAM and bridges. This method is typically used on older systems without CPU multipliers. If you proceed, you must adjust your RAM voltages and uncores to ensure stability. It’s quite challenging to overclock this approach because it’s hard to confirm what parts are unstable. He also questions the need for a CPU multiplier overclock when using XMP profiles for memory, suggesting that adjusting timing and voltage settings would be more appropriate. For older CPUs and Skylake chips, the performance improves significantly with BCLK overclocks, often providing up to a 20% boost.
I
ImSquirrel
11-09-2016, 02:51 PM #3

JimF_35 explains that the front side bus is now referred to as the Base Clock (BLCK). He advises against overclocking it, as this could affect the main bus and cause instability across all devices like RAM and bridges. This method is typically used on older systems without CPU multipliers. If you proceed, you must adjust your RAM voltages and uncores to ensure stability. It’s quite challenging to overclock this approach because it’s hard to confirm what parts are unstable. He also questions the need for a CPU multiplier overclock when using XMP profiles for memory, suggesting that adjusting timing and voltage settings would be more appropriate. For older CPUs and Skylake chips, the performance improves significantly with BCLK overclocks, often providing up to a 20% boost.

B
Boba999
Member
130
11-11-2016, 11:51 AM
#4
JimF_35 is discussing the current naming of the front side bus as the Base Clock (BLCK). He advises against overclocking it, explaining that doing so could affect the main bus and cause instability across all components like RAM and bridges. He notes this method is typically used on older systems without CPU multipliers. If someone chooses this route, they must adjust their RAM voltages and uncores to ensure stability. He emphasizes the difficulty of this approach due to uncertainty about what parts remain stable.

He also questions why someone would prefer a FSB overclock over a CPU multiplier overclock for memory enhancement. He suggests using XMP profiles for RAM overclocking, recommending careful tuning of timing and voltages for stability. He shares his experience of successfully overclocking an FX-4350 to 4.6GHz with the multiplier, noting that lowering the multiplier while raising the base clock helps maintain performance.

Jim mentions experimenting with RAMDisk to boost Readyboost, as he believes RAM is faster than storage devices and wants to optimize program loading. He is exploring FSB overclocking to potentially improve RAM transfer speeds and is testing ways to enhance RAM performance and data transfer between CPU and RAM. He clarifies that his inquiry is unusual but part of his experimentation to see if it improves load times.
B
Boba999
11-11-2016, 11:51 AM #4

JimF_35 is discussing the current naming of the front side bus as the Base Clock (BLCK). He advises against overclocking it, explaining that doing so could affect the main bus and cause instability across all components like RAM and bridges. He notes this method is typically used on older systems without CPU multipliers. If someone chooses this route, they must adjust their RAM voltages and uncores to ensure stability. He emphasizes the difficulty of this approach due to uncertainty about what parts remain stable.

He also questions why someone would prefer a FSB overclock over a CPU multiplier overclock for memory enhancement. He suggests using XMP profiles for RAM overclocking, recommending careful tuning of timing and voltages for stability. He shares his experience of successfully overclocking an FX-4350 to 4.6GHz with the multiplier, noting that lowering the multiplier while raising the base clock helps maintain performance.

Jim mentions experimenting with RAMDisk to boost Readyboost, as he believes RAM is faster than storage devices and wants to optimize program loading. He is exploring FSB overclocking to potentially improve RAM transfer speeds and is testing ways to enhance RAM performance and data transfer between CPU and RAM. He clarifies that his inquiry is unusual but part of his experimentation to see if it improves load times.

F
FlyHigh94
Junior Member
21
11-11-2016, 04:26 PM
#5
This system is designed to serve a specific purpose, though the exact function depends on the context provided. It appears to be structured for clarity and precision in its intended application.
F
FlyHigh94
11-11-2016, 04:26 PM #5

This system is designed to serve a specific purpose, though the exact function depends on the context provided. It appears to be structured for clarity and precision in its intended application.

F
froggiee
Junior Member
28
11-16-2016, 08:47 PM
#6
I'm primarily using it for gaming.
F
froggiee
11-16-2016, 08:47 PM #6

I'm primarily using it for gaming.

B
bronzered
Member
74
11-17-2016, 01:55 AM
#7
I use it mostly for gaming. What exact advantage are you hoping to gain by increasing the FSB speed? The concept of "transfer speeds between the CPU and RAM" makes sense, but how exactly would that enhance your gaming experience?
B
bronzered
11-17-2016, 01:55 AM #7

I use it mostly for gaming. What exact advantage are you hoping to gain by increasing the FSB speed? The concept of "transfer speeds between the CPU and RAM" makes sense, but how exactly would that enhance your gaming experience?

Z
zamys
Senior Member
690
11-17-2016, 05:07 AM
#8
For your convenience, I aim to enhance the speed between each map or level. I also seek to boost the initial load times of my regular programs and games. Right now, I’m not encountering major loading problems, but I’m exploring ways to further minimize them.

In terms of documented improvements, I don’t have specific "Before and After" metrics or measurable outcomes for my current loading times. I’ll need a way to track progress. However, I’ve observed that switching the storage location of TEMP and TMP files to RAMDisk makes my browser launch faster. This suggests there’s potential to cut down on loading times by using RAMDisk instead of the traditional hard drive.
Z
zamys
11-17-2016, 05:07 AM #8

For your convenience, I aim to enhance the speed between each map or level. I also seek to boost the initial load times of my regular programs and games. Right now, I’m not encountering major loading problems, but I’m exploring ways to further minimize them.

In terms of documented improvements, I don’t have specific "Before and After" metrics or measurable outcomes for my current loading times. I’ll need a way to track progress. However, I’ve observed that switching the storage location of TEMP and TMP files to RAMDisk makes my browser launch faster. This suggests there’s potential to cut down on loading times by using RAMDisk instead of the traditional hard drive.

E
ethandizzy
Member
169
11-29-2016, 03:53 AM
#9
When considering ways to enhance your gaming experience through storage improvements, keep in mind a few important points. In most multiplayer titles, it doesn’t really matter much. Games such as StarCraft, CoD, BF, etc., require everyone to finish loading before you can join. This means you won’t progress faster since you still have to wait for others and for the server to sync. The only exception is in MMOs when loading a new area. Even then, there are speed restrictions due to the game’s design.

Secondly, certain games have fixed loading times. Elements like logos, videos, and splash screens can’t always be skipped. For example, Mass Effect 2 required playing its loading animations at least once before moving forward. This meant that even with an SSD, I didn’t notice any improvement when loading save files until I adjusted the game settings and removed the videos (which then allowed maps and saves to load in just 1–2 seconds).

Lastly, understand the boundaries. While a RAM disk is significantly quicker than an SSD according to benchmarks, sometimes users don’t really feel the difference because our reactions lag behind the computer’s speed. You’ll soon find yourself investing more time, effort, and money than it’s worth just to achieve maximum speed. The real speed gain might not be much better than what a more affordable option offers.

If you aim to boost your RAM disk performance, focus on optimizing its frequency and latency settings rather than just increasing the BCLK speed. However, loading programs from a RAM disk is already extremely fast at normal speeds, so don’t expect a clear improvement.
E
ethandizzy
11-29-2016, 03:53 AM #9

When considering ways to enhance your gaming experience through storage improvements, keep in mind a few important points. In most multiplayer titles, it doesn’t really matter much. Games such as StarCraft, CoD, BF, etc., require everyone to finish loading before you can join. This means you won’t progress faster since you still have to wait for others and for the server to sync. The only exception is in MMOs when loading a new area. Even then, there are speed restrictions due to the game’s design.

Secondly, certain games have fixed loading times. Elements like logos, videos, and splash screens can’t always be skipped. For example, Mass Effect 2 required playing its loading animations at least once before moving forward. This meant that even with an SSD, I didn’t notice any improvement when loading save files until I adjusted the game settings and removed the videos (which then allowed maps and saves to load in just 1–2 seconds).

Lastly, understand the boundaries. While a RAM disk is significantly quicker than an SSD according to benchmarks, sometimes users don’t really feel the difference because our reactions lag behind the computer’s speed. You’ll soon find yourself investing more time, effort, and money than it’s worth just to achieve maximum speed. The real speed gain might not be much better than what a more affordable option offers.

If you aim to boost your RAM disk performance, focus on optimizing its frequency and latency settings rather than just increasing the BCLK speed. However, loading programs from a RAM disk is already extremely fast at normal speeds, so don’t expect a clear improvement.

S
Skyguy_
Member
228
12-05-2016, 03:04 AM
#10
This explains how to assess your performance with RAMDisk Readyboost, highlighting the ability to compare pre- and post-implementation results.
S
Skyguy_
12-05-2016, 03:04 AM #10

This explains how to assess your performance with RAMDisk Readyboost, highlighting the ability to compare pre- and post-implementation results.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next