F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Higher temperatures than anticipated on the i7 5820k

Higher temperatures than anticipated on the i7 5820k

Higher temperatures than anticipated on the i7 5820k

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
P
Phozzonunnium
Member
55
01-28-2017, 01:33 PM
#11
Oaks11:
toolmaker_03:
Discussing the removal of the CPU and swapping the TIM between the heatspreader and the chip can be dangerous, as it might harm the CPU. I’m proceeding with this change; using liquid metal pro between them is extreme and could cause damage. Are you open to trying a different setup? This adjustment should help balance temperatures across cores, keeping core temps stable without lowering them.

I’m aware my 3930K has a core that runs about 7°C hotter than the rest, which is why I’m considering this. While I don’t want a large temperature gap between cores, it might be safer to avoid delidding. Perhaps I’ll revert to the default clocks and voltage to test if temperatures improve.

Why would you revert to the original settings? A maximum of 75°C on the hottest core is acceptable. Prioritizing lower temperatures isn’t worth risking damage. If you’re serious about performance, an AIO with dual radiators like the Corsair H100i or Coolermaster Nepton 240M would be ideal. For those willing to invest more, the EK Predator AIO is a top choice.
P
Phozzonunnium
01-28-2017, 01:33 PM #11

Oaks11:
toolmaker_03:
Discussing the removal of the CPU and swapping the TIM between the heatspreader and the chip can be dangerous, as it might harm the CPU. I’m proceeding with this change; using liquid metal pro between them is extreme and could cause damage. Are you open to trying a different setup? This adjustment should help balance temperatures across cores, keeping core temps stable without lowering them.

I’m aware my 3930K has a core that runs about 7°C hotter than the rest, which is why I’m considering this. While I don’t want a large temperature gap between cores, it might be safer to avoid delidding. Perhaps I’ll revert to the default clocks and voltage to test if temperatures improve.

Why would you revert to the original settings? A maximum of 75°C on the hottest core is acceptable. Prioritizing lower temperatures isn’t worth risking damage. If you’re serious about performance, an AIO with dual radiators like the Corsair H100i or Coolermaster Nepton 240M would be ideal. For those willing to invest more, the EK Predator AIO is a top choice.

O
opticgunship
Posting Freak
815
01-30-2017, 09:33 PM
#12
with air cooling at 4.4Ghz, it really handles the heat well reaching only 73C. I use water cooling too; even at 4.4Ghz it stays around 65C, and at 4.8Ghz it hits 75C, which is great. At 4Ghz I run my CPU to about 49C, while stock settings would never exceed 35C. Water cooling performs exceptionally at stock levels. See the links for more details: My current build is quite extreme.
O
opticgunship
01-30-2017, 09:33 PM #12

with air cooling at 4.4Ghz, it really handles the heat well reaching only 73C. I use water cooling too; even at 4.4Ghz it stays around 65C, and at 4.8Ghz it hits 75C, which is great. At 4Ghz I run my CPU to about 49C, while stock settings would never exceed 35C. Water cooling performs exceptionally at stock levels. See the links for more details: My current build is quite extreme.

M
mc_cass
Junior Member
4
02-02-2017, 09:28 AM
#13
Mr Kagouris discusses concerns about CPU stability and temperature management. He mentions using liquid metal pro between the heatspreader and the chip, warning about potential damage. He seeks advice on whether to proceed with this change or revert to default settings, emphasizing the need for better core temperature control.
M
mc_cass
02-02-2017, 09:28 AM #13

Mr Kagouris discusses concerns about CPU stability and temperature management. He mentions using liquid metal pro between the heatspreader and the chip, warning about potential damage. He seeks advice on whether to proceed with this change or revert to default settings, emphasizing the need for better core temperature control.

J
JavaCatX
Member
99
02-02-2017, 11:40 AM
#14
I don't understand how tweakdown arrived at those temperatures, but my 3930K at 4Ghz shows a 41C idle temperature.
At 4.4Ghz it would be 49C, at 4.8Ghz it would be 58C.
27C is the CPU's idle temperature if it were in stock settings.
J
JavaCatX
02-02-2017, 11:40 AM #14

I don't understand how tweakdown arrived at those temperatures, but my 3930K at 4Ghz shows a 41C idle temperature.
At 4.4Ghz it would be 49C, at 4.8Ghz it would be 58C.
27C is the CPU's idle temperature if it were in stock settings.

T
TheInfiniteFox
Junior Member
20
02-03-2017, 06:13 AM
#15
Oaks11 continued the discussion, noting concerns about CPU damage during delidding and replacing the TIM. They mentioned using liquid metal pro between the heatspreader and chip, acknowledging the risk but emphasizing it could help stabilize temperatures. The user shared their experience with a 3930K CPU that runs significantly hotter than others, explaining the motivation behind the change. They questioned whether reverting to default clocks and voltage would yield better results, emphasizing that low temperatures aren't always beneficial. They also speculated about potential causes for low idle temps, suggesting factors beyond tweaktown settings. The conversation concluded with uncertainty about the exact reasons for the observed performance.
T
TheInfiniteFox
02-03-2017, 06:13 AM #15

Oaks11 continued the discussion, noting concerns about CPU damage during delidding and replacing the TIM. They mentioned using liquid metal pro between the heatspreader and chip, acknowledging the risk but emphasizing it could help stabilize temperatures. The user shared their experience with a 3930K CPU that runs significantly hotter than others, explaining the motivation behind the change. They questioned whether reverting to default clocks and voltage would yield better results, emphasizing that low temperatures aren't always beneficial. They also speculated about potential causes for low idle temps, suggesting factors beyond tweaktown settings. The conversation concluded with uncertainty about the exact reasons for the observed performance.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2