F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Hey there! What's up?

Hey there! What's up?

Hey there! What's up?

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
Z
ZethPlays
Member
195
02-25-2016, 04:30 AM
#11
They must come from AMD or NVIDIA to enable that feature, because it’s significantly more complex than simply having DX12 support.
Z
ZethPlays
02-25-2016, 04:30 AM #11

They must come from AMD or NVIDIA to enable that feature, because it’s significantly more complex than simply having DX12 support.

N
Nazeo_
Junior Member
41
03-02-2016, 12:13 PM
#12
Alright, so I guess I should yell at them to make a meal...
N
Nazeo_
03-02-2016, 12:13 PM #12

Alright, so I guess I should yell at them to make a meal...

M
MLGGirl54
Senior Member
258
03-02-2016, 01:54 PM
#13
currently there are no games that back its latest updates
M
MLGGirl54
03-02-2016, 01:54 PM #13

currently there are no games that back its latest updates

A
Ankkuli_
Member
157
03-02-2016, 02:48 PM
#14
BF Hardline uses DX12 engine and Mantle for its implementation.
A
Ankkuli_
03-02-2016, 02:48 PM #14

BF Hardline uses DX12 engine and Mantle for its implementation.

S
SBL_AndySaur
Junior Member
13
03-22-2016, 04:23 AM
#15
It works with Mantle, I’m not sure about DX12 unless it offers better performance compared to previous versions. It doesn’t seem to provide extra features like combined VRAM.
S
SBL_AndySaur
03-22-2016, 04:23 AM #15

It works with Mantle, I’m not sure about DX12 unless it offers better performance compared to previous versions. It doesn’t seem to provide extra features like combined VRAM.

C
CalizePop
Junior Member
20
03-22-2016, 12:49 PM
#16
Sorry for these queries, but at full performance with aa and maximum settings I achieved 65 FPS without mantle in bf4. Without mantle in bfh I reached 86 FPs. It looks like bfh offers superior graphics... Why is that?
C
CalizePop
03-22-2016, 12:49 PM #16

Sorry for these queries, but at full performance with aa and maximum settings I achieved 65 FPS without mantle in bf4. Without mantle in bfh I reached 86 FPs. It looks like bfh offers superior graphics... Why is that?

H
HeroJimmy
Junior Member
11
03-28-2016, 12:52 AM
#17
Stay clear and consistent in your message.
H
HeroJimmy
03-28-2016, 12:52 AM #17

Stay clear and consistent in your message.

X
xRedxNightx
Member
176
04-02-2016, 04:34 PM
#18
Your question is unclear. Could you provide more details about what you're asking?
X
xRedxNightx
04-02-2016, 04:34 PM #18

Your question is unclear. Could you provide more details about what you're asking?

J
Jordinosaur
Junior Member
17
04-02-2016, 06:27 PM
#19
Without the mantle, you see 65 frames per second, and when it's removed, it drops to 86 fps. It seems like you're wondering why the rates differ even though you're excluding the mantle effect. I'd expect one version to include it and another to not, but that's why you're seeing the change.
J
Jordinosaur
04-02-2016, 06:27 PM #19

Without the mantle, you see 65 frames per second, and when it's removed, it drops to 86 fps. It seems like you're wondering why the rates differ even though you're excluding the mantle effect. I'd expect one version to include it and another to not, but that's why you're seeing the change.

H
hampus_1
Member
72
04-02-2016, 11:54 PM
#20
The version with 86 was quite tough on the battlefield. If it's a beta release, it likely means the graphics were reduced.
H
hampus_1
04-02-2016, 11:54 PM #20

The version with 86 was quite tough on the battlefield. If it's a beta release, it likely means the graphics were reduced.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next