F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Hey LTT, a solid lightweight Linux distribution would be LTS variants like Lubuntu or Xubuntu.

Hey LTT, a solid lightweight Linux distribution would be LTS variants like Lubuntu or Xubuntu.

Hey LTT, a solid lightweight Linux distribution would be LTS variants like Lubuntu or Xubuntu.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
Ladrigon
Member
61
11-08-2016, 05:59 PM
#1
Hello, I'm trying to turn my Raspberry Pi 4 into a TV player. It has 4GB of RAM, but I'm having trouble finding a lightweight OS that works well. I've used Raspberry Pi OS before, but it caused issues with the Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, shutting down completely even after unplugging. Now I'm looking for something that can handle internet access, logins via Windows, smooth file transfers without delays, and all this running smoothly. I don't mind trying less-known OSes if it works. Also, just a quick question: can a Raspberry Pi 4 with 4GB RAM run any operating system? Thanks in advance for your help!
L
Ladrigon
11-08-2016, 05:59 PM #1

Hello, I'm trying to turn my Raspberry Pi 4 into a TV player. It has 4GB of RAM, but I'm having trouble finding a lightweight OS that works well. I've used Raspberry Pi OS before, but it caused issues with the Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, shutting down completely even after unplugging. Now I'm looking for something that can handle internet access, logins via Windows, smooth file transfers without delays, and all this running smoothly. I don't mind trying less-known OSes if it works. Also, just a quick question: can a Raspberry Pi 4 with 4GB RAM run any operating system? Thanks in advance for your help!

N
nicolasplay
Junior Member
9
11-08-2016, 11:52 PM
#2
Raspbian is definitely the top choice. Fixing problems in Raspberry Pi is simpler than tackling them on other systems.
N
nicolasplay
11-08-2016, 11:52 PM #2

Raspbian is definitely the top choice. Fixing problems in Raspberry Pi is simpler than tackling them on other systems.

C
Charliemc909
Posting Freak
898
11-09-2016, 12:48 AM
#3
cool but then there is the problem were when i use vlc it puts the bluetooh mouse to sleep and it wont wake up any ideas to why
C
Charliemc909
11-09-2016, 12:48 AM #3

cool but then there is the problem were when i use vlc it puts the bluetooh mouse to sleep and it wont wake up any ideas to why

E
enderdance123
Member
78
11-09-2016, 01:26 AM
#4
LibreElec also has limited Blutooth support on Linux, which I consider not ideal since the protocol isn’t very reliable. It seems safer to use Logitech devices with their receivers instead of Bluetooth. Additionally, the Pi Bluetooth module appears to be quite outdated and may not handle modern Bluetooth standards well.
E
enderdance123
11-09-2016, 01:26 AM #4

LibreElec also has limited Blutooth support on Linux, which I consider not ideal since the protocol isn’t very reliable. It seems safer to use Logitech devices with their receivers instead of Bluetooth. Additionally, the Pi Bluetooth module appears to be quite outdated and may not handle modern Bluetooth standards well.

L
Lt_carpenter
Junior Member
7
11-09-2016, 05:06 AM
#5
I've tested them but kept running into issues because I couldn't find a way to access the internet freely. Using a Raspberry Pi with VLC works for me, though. If you're on a very basic OS like Slax RAM, it should be possible if you adjust settings. Your specs—RAM, CPU, storage—seem compatible with what I've seen work.
L
Lt_carpenter
11-09-2016, 05:06 AM #5

I've tested them but kept running into issues because I couldn't find a way to access the internet freely. Using a Raspberry Pi with VLC works for me, though. If you're on a very basic OS like Slax RAM, it should be possible if you adjust settings. Your specs—RAM, CPU, storage—seem compatible with what I've seen work.

T
tobytoetable
Junior Member
13
11-09-2016, 09:20 AM
#6
Alpine Linux consumes fewer system resources compared to Raspbian. This makes it a viable option for testing. Lightweight alternatives like FreeBSD and NetBSD also perform well for many tasks. For more details, see the provided links.
T
tobytoetable
11-09-2016, 09:20 AM #6

Alpine Linux consumes fewer system resources compared to Raspbian. This makes it a viable option for testing. Lightweight alternatives like FreeBSD and NetBSD also perform well for many tasks. For more details, see the provided links.

J
JokerFame
Senior Member
670
11-12-2016, 03:47 PM
#7
The simplest method to connect to the internet after NT is via USB tethering from your phone. You can also repurpose an old phone as a Wi-Fi dongle by linking your existing Wi-Fi.
J
JokerFame
11-12-2016, 03:47 PM #7

The simplest method to connect to the internet after NT is via USB tethering from your phone. You can also repurpose an old phone as a Wi-Fi dongle by linking your existing Wi-Fi.

L
Leumas_R
Member
155
11-12-2016, 04:15 PM
#8
Alpine Linux https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Raspbe...me_Machine FreeBSD https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm/Raspberry Pi NetBSD https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/evbarm/raspberry_pi/ presents strong results on my machine. I compared it to Clear Linux, which is the fastest available distro. The FreeBSD version with Firefox 102 and WebXPRT 4 achieved 1774.6 ms (the lower the better). Speedometer readings were 2.0, 62.5 Octane, 16317, and so on. Basemark Web 3.0 showed 141.44, SilverBench P3425 JetStream 2 48368, Gimp start time 4.5s, LibreOffice was notably slow. The test also noted slower performance in Basemark Web 3.0 and JetStream 2 compared to standard Linux. FreeBSD’s speed depends heavily on ZFS usage. If you disconnect it, the data remains intact; otherwise, Linux files may become unreliable.
L
Leumas_R
11-12-2016, 04:15 PM #8

Alpine Linux https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Raspbe...me_Machine FreeBSD https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm/Raspberry Pi NetBSD https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/evbarm/raspberry_pi/ presents strong results on my machine. I compared it to Clear Linux, which is the fastest available distro. The FreeBSD version with Firefox 102 and WebXPRT 4 achieved 1774.6 ms (the lower the better). Speedometer readings were 2.0, 62.5 Octane, 16317, and so on. Basemark Web 3.0 showed 141.44, SilverBench P3425 JetStream 2 48368, Gimp start time 4.5s, LibreOffice was notably slow. The test also noted slower performance in Basemark Web 3.0 and JetStream 2 compared to standard Linux. FreeBSD’s speed depends heavily on ZFS usage. If you disconnect it, the data remains intact; otherwise, Linux files may become unreliable.

F
Fergy04
Member
152
11-13-2016, 10:44 AM
#9
Thanks a lot!
F
Fergy04
11-13-2016, 10:44 AM #9

Thanks a lot!

D
Dohndude
Member
186
11-13-2016, 03:59 PM
#10
Linux supports ZFS as well as XFCE
D
Dohndude
11-13-2016, 03:59 PM #10

Linux supports ZFS as well as XFCE

Pages (2): 1 2 Next