F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Help! The CPU can't be overclocked beyond 3.9 GHz!

Help! The CPU can't be overclocked beyond 3.9 GHz!

Help! The CPU can't be overclocked beyond 3.9 GHz!

S
Smurphetta
Junior Member
17
02-12-2017, 02:58 PM
#1
I recently assembled my first gaming PC with these components:
CPU - Ryzen 3 1300X (Stock Cooler)
RAM - 8GB G.Skill 3200Mhz
Mobo - Asus Prime B350-PLUS
GPU - MSI GTX 1050 Ti
After setting everything up and installing the necessary software, I opted to overclock it slightly. In the BIOS I began at 3.8Ghz and then adjusted to 3.9Ghz, both times functioning properly. I used AIDA64 for stress testing and temperature monitoring. When attempting 4GHz, the system booted into Windows smoothly and maintained a stable 36°C during the test. I checked CPU-Z and found my clock at 1546Mhz, which was slightly higher than expected. In Windows, it displayed 3.99Ghz. A Cinebench R15 test showed performance around 200, compared to the 500 I expected at stock speed. I restarted multiple times, confirming BIOS settings and ensuring stability at 3.9Ghz, but 4.0 failed consistently. The temperatures remained normal even at 3.9Ghz. Any suggestions?
S
Smurphetta
02-12-2017, 02:58 PM #1

I recently assembled my first gaming PC with these components:
CPU - Ryzen 3 1300X (Stock Cooler)
RAM - 8GB G.Skill 3200Mhz
Mobo - Asus Prime B350-PLUS
GPU - MSI GTX 1050 Ti
After setting everything up and installing the necessary software, I opted to overclock it slightly. In the BIOS I began at 3.8Ghz and then adjusted to 3.9Ghz, both times functioning properly. I used AIDA64 for stress testing and temperature monitoring. When attempting 4GHz, the system booted into Windows smoothly and maintained a stable 36°C during the test. I checked CPU-Z and found my clock at 1546Mhz, which was slightly higher than expected. In Windows, it displayed 3.99Ghz. A Cinebench R15 test showed performance around 200, compared to the 500 I expected at stock speed. I restarted multiple times, confirming BIOS settings and ensuring stability at 3.9Ghz, but 4.0 failed consistently. The temperatures remained normal even at 3.9Ghz. Any suggestions?

A
Aquaman_JLA
Junior Member
44
02-17-2017, 10:01 PM
#2
I just saw the person in this discussion faces a comparable issue and recommend you monitor it for a solution.
A
Aquaman_JLA
02-17-2017, 10:01 PM #2

I just saw the person in this discussion faces a comparable issue and recommend you monitor it for a solution.

Z
zLeoZiin
Senior Member
503
02-23-2017, 01:43 PM
#3
Have you increased the vcore?
Z
zLeoZiin
02-23-2017, 01:43 PM #3

Have you increased the vcore?

B
Beavz
Member
208
02-23-2017, 08:12 PM
#4
I noticed on page 1200 that achieving 3800 at 1.2V is possible, yet 4GHx requires 1.375V and exceeds 90°C.
B
Beavz
02-23-2017, 08:12 PM #4

I noticed on page 1200 that achieving 3800 at 1.2V is possible, yet 4GHx requires 1.375V and exceeds 90°C.

A
Adabelle
Senior Member
724
03-11-2017, 01:30 AM
#5
Have you adjusted the vcore?
No, I haven’t changed it, but I didn’t expect a need because the temperatures were still low during the first run. I also thought that if more power was required, my system would fail rather than behave strangely now.
A
Adabelle
03-11-2017, 01:30 AM #5

Have you adjusted the vcore?
No, I haven’t changed it, but I didn’t expect a need because the temperatures were still low during the first run. I also thought that if more power was required, my system would fail rather than behave strangely now.

T
TheRealBhevo
Junior Member
12
03-11-2017, 05:58 AM
#6
I noticed on 1200 I could achieve 3800 at 1.2V, but 4GHx requires 1.375 and causes overheating above 90°C. I’d still get that, but the issue is it doesn’t crash the system—it just slows it down significantly.
T
TheRealBhevo
03-11-2017, 05:58 AM #6

I noticed on 1200 I could achieve 3800 at 1.2V, but 4GHx requires 1.375 and causes overheating above 90°C. I’d still get that, but the issue is it doesn’t crash the system—it just slows it down significantly.

L
LordFrogi
Member
60
03-29-2017, 02:19 PM
#7
I mentioned earlier that 3.9GHz might be the maximum for stock cooling. To aim for 4GHz, set the voltage to your preferred level (around 1.4V) and test it. If it doesn’t work, it could be a board issue causing throttling to 1.5GHz as a precaution. Leaving the voltage on auto might lead to overvoltage and damage.
L
LordFrogi
03-29-2017, 02:19 PM #7

I mentioned earlier that 3.9GHz might be the maximum for stock cooling. To aim for 4GHz, set the voltage to your preferred level (around 1.4V) and test it. If it doesn’t work, it could be a board issue causing throttling to 1.5GHz as a precaution. Leaving the voltage on auto might lead to overvoltage and damage.

K
kalleboii
Senior Member
738
03-29-2017, 03:05 PM
#8
I just saw the person in this discussion faces a comparable issue and recommend you monitor it for a solution.
K
kalleboii
03-29-2017, 03:05 PM #8

I just saw the person in this discussion faces a comparable issue and recommend you monitor it for a solution.