F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks hdmi 2.1

hdmi 2.1

hdmi 2.1

N
NinjaTurtleNL
Member
207
11-08-2016, 06:50 PM
#1
HDMI 2.1 offers impressive speeds, but it’s designed for video transmission rather than data transfer. Ethernet cables are built for high-speed networking, and using HDMI bandwidth for data would be inefficient. Additionally, HDMI has better resistance to interference compared to Ethernet, making it more suitable for clear signal delivery. In the server world, where bandwidth is critical, people focus on technologies specifically optimized for data, not video formats.
N
NinjaTurtleNL
11-08-2016, 06:50 PM #1

HDMI 2.1 offers impressive speeds, but it’s designed for video transmission rather than data transfer. Ethernet cables are built for high-speed networking, and using HDMI bandwidth for data would be inefficient. Additionally, HDMI has better resistance to interference compared to Ethernet, making it more suitable for clear signal delivery. In the server world, where bandwidth is critical, people focus on technologies specifically optimized for data, not video formats.

N
NSXT1
Junior Member
22
11-30-2016, 04:09 PM
#2
Ethernet must operate across long spans, but the 48 Gbit/s capacity is mainly practical for brief runs on unpowered wires.
N
NSXT1
11-30-2016, 04:09 PM #2

Ethernet must operate across long spans, but the 48 Gbit/s capacity is mainly practical for brief runs on unpowered wires.

J
JJprogamers
Member
161
12-13-2016, 02:34 AM
#3
range.
J
JJprogamers
12-13-2016, 02:34 AM #3

range.

C
CrazyMerji
Member
182
12-13-2016, 02:59 AM
#4
Ethernet offers greater distance capabilities.
C
CrazyMerji
12-13-2016, 02:59 AM #4

Ethernet offers greater distance capabilities.

X
xXRAXERXx
Posting Freak
817
12-17-2016, 08:58 AM
#5
Fiber optic is used in about 99% of data center setups. Copper Cat6 or Cat8 connections are typically for speeds under 10Gbps, while Cat8 supports 25Gbps or 40Gbps depending on the model, but no devices currently use it and it’s unlikely to appear soon. Fiber generally covers most needs, with some copper Twinax at specific lengths (0.5/1/3/5/7 meters) for other applications. Twinax is inexpensive but offers fixed speeds; upgrading requires replacing the entire cable. For fiber, simply swap the QSFP modules to adjust speed without changing cables. Excluding fixed-length Twinax, it can handle 400Gbps at 7-10 meters today, and fiber can span thousands of kilometers at higher speeds. Copper RJ45 supports up to 100 meters but is largely obsolete for data centers requiring 25Gbps or more.
X
xXRAXERXx
12-17-2016, 08:58 AM #5

Fiber optic is used in about 99% of data center setups. Copper Cat6 or Cat8 connections are typically for speeds under 10Gbps, while Cat8 supports 25Gbps or 40Gbps depending on the model, but no devices currently use it and it’s unlikely to appear soon. Fiber generally covers most needs, with some copper Twinax at specific lengths (0.5/1/3/5/7 meters) for other applications. Twinax is inexpensive but offers fixed speeds; upgrading requires replacing the entire cable. For fiber, simply swap the QSFP modules to adjust speed without changing cables. Excluding fixed-length Twinax, it can handle 400Gbps at 7-10 meters today, and fiber can span thousands of kilometers at higher speeds. Copper RJ45 supports up to 100 meters but is largely obsolete for data centers requiring 25Gbps or more.