Have you encountered these motherboards before?
Have you encountered these motherboards before?
It refers to an integrated graphics option for your future needs. It's a decent choice, though it falls short compared to a GTX 760.
I don't understand what you're asking for, but if you want to know the truth, I played Resident Evil 2 and it might have been running at the lowest settings. On a 32-inch and 1440p screen right now, I was seeing around 35 FPS, though it could reach 60 FPS sometimes. A PS4 Slim and a PC with an i7-7700K are capable of that. If you don't have space to buy a high-end GPU, a mid-range PC is a good option. Just let me know what you think.
He only wants to point out that saying "UHD630 is better than GTX760" doesn't hold up, since it's just a bit higher than the GT730. I'm in agreement with him—it's similar to AMD claiming the RX790X is better than the RTX4090, even though they didn't say so. You should feel the same way.
I tried to explain it, but it seemed a bit off. The 760 GPU is just a step up from the 730, right? It's surprising someone would say it's that much better, especially since it was only five years ago and people still think you need the top card for games. Back then, even games weren't that demanding, so it wasn't uncommon to expect a high-end GPU just to play.
It would be nice to hear what I was saying without being ignored. That’s all I need.
There is a huge gulf between the 760 and the 730. This just further goes to show how little you know about GPU's. This is what I called wildly untrue: The UHD 630 cannot outperform the GTX 760, or come anywhere close to doing so. You were not just "a little off," your comparisons to the 730 aren't relevant. You were completely and utterly mistaken.
It doesn't really matter what everyone is saying at the moment. I'm referring to periods when there was no clear alternative available. GPUs improve over time, and the demand for them has increased accordingly. If you want to emphasize the importance of comparing the 4090 against the original NVIDIA GPUs, it might be worth discussing that. There wasn't a huge gap between GPUs throughout their evolution; instead, there was a noticeable jump in performance that set them apart from previous models. This shift is often used in marketing to suggest you're always looking for the next best option, but in reality, you're usually just upgrading to a slightly more capable card without a significant leap in efficiency. What you receive isn't necessarily a revolutionary upgrade—it's just another chip designed to tackle similar challenges. The real issue lies with how powerful they are and the cooling requirements. For example, the 3060 and 3060 Ti differ mainly in performance levels, not fundamentally. The 3060 still performs well compared to earlier models, but it doesn't stand up against the 3060 Ti in many scenarios. If you truly needed a card that surpasses all others, then the marketing would be misleading. Most people aren't ready to push the 3060 to its limits just to see how much it improves. The only way the 3060 could compete with the 3060 Ti is if it offered something genuinely new and better, which hasn't happened yet. When demand was high, NVIDIA likely wouldn't have launched the 4090 just to create a hype. If there had been a genuine need for a superior GPU, people would have chosen it, not just because it promised the next step.
It doesn't really matter what everyone is saying at the moment. I'm referring to periods when there was no clear alternative available. GPUs improve over time, and the demand for them has increased accordingly. If you want to emphasize the importance of the 4090 versus earlier NVIDIA models, consider discussing a comparison between the 4090 and the first GPUs ever created by NVIDIA. There wasn't a massive gap in performance; instead, there was just a noticeable jump in capability compared to previous generations. This shift is largely driven by marketing strategies that suggest you always need the next upgrade, even though the improvements aren't always substantial. In reality, most GPUs are just incremental upgrades, aimed at solving similar problems with better efficiency and cooling. For example, the 3060 remains strong but doesn't stand out against the 3060ti in many scenarios. The real challenge isn't finding a single GPU that's clearly superior; it's about understanding what you actually need and whether it truly solves your specific issue. Marketing often plays a big role here, pushing consumers toward newer models without always delivering meaningful gains.