F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking H60 FX 8320 overclocking

H60 FX 8320 overclocking

H60 FX 8320 overclocking

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
missbatmanxox
Member
111
12-17-2016, 09:25 AM
#1
Hey there, so today is Boxing Day in Canada and I decided to buy a Corsair H60 CPU cooler. I was curious about how much overclocking I could achieve with this configuration. My idle temps are now between 21-27°C and 40°C during gameplay (GTA V). The CPU model is FX 8320, the cooler is H60 with push/pull mode, the motherboard is M5A99X Evo R2.0, I have 2x4 GB of RAM, and the power supply is an EVGA 600B 600w. Can I reach around 4.5 Ghz on my CPU? What’s the maximum overclock potential?
M
missbatmanxox
12-17-2016, 09:25 AM #1

Hey there, so today is Boxing Day in Canada and I decided to buy a Corsair H60 CPU cooler. I was curious about how much overclocking I could achieve with this configuration. My idle temps are now between 21-27°C and 40°C during gameplay (GTA V). The CPU model is FX 8320, the cooler is H60 with push/pull mode, the motherboard is M5A99X Evo R2.0, I have 2x4 GB of RAM, and the power supply is an EVGA 600B 600w. Can I reach around 4.5 Ghz on my CPU? What’s the maximum overclock potential?

P
patrickbostic
Junior Member
5
12-17-2016, 10:23 AM
#2
CPU units are generally unique, and Asus conducted some intriguing tests recently. The motherboard should work, but it’s not ideal here; a decent one would suffice, even with a 390, you can still use the EVGA 600, and an 800 is unnecessary—coolers will handle it fine. Better or cheaper options are recommended.
P
patrickbostic
12-17-2016, 10:23 AM #2

CPU units are generally unique, and Asus conducted some intriguing tests recently. The motherboard should work, but it’s not ideal here; a decent one would suffice, even with a 390, you can still use the EVGA 600, and an 800 is unnecessary—coolers will handle it fine. Better or cheaper options are recommended.

K
KRC4267
Member
69
12-19-2016, 10:46 AM
#3
Sure, you can easily boost the CPU to around 4.5ghz without hitting any limits—it might reach 4ghz or even 6ghz if using liquid nitrogen. The FX 8370 currently holds the world record at 8.7ghz when powered by liquid nitrogen.
K
KRC4267
12-19-2016, 10:46 AM #3

Sure, you can easily boost the CPU to around 4.5ghz without hitting any limits—it might reach 4ghz or even 6ghz if using liquid nitrogen. The FX 8370 currently holds the world record at 8.7ghz when powered by liquid nitrogen.

K
khaledkb_
Senior Member
724
12-26-2016, 03:55 AM
#4
Every processor increases its speed in its own way. Claiming you can easily reach 4.5Ghz without problems isn't realistic. The outcome really comes down to your performance in the chip selection process. Certain FX 8320 models struggle to exceed 4.2Ghz, while others easily surpass 5Ghz—it all depends on your specific chip. Still, if your processor performed well in the chip lottery, you have the necessary components to achieve 4.5Ghz.

Overclocking relies heavily on binning. The top-performing FX processors are built for the FX 8370 and FX 9xxx series. Lower-binned chips are designed for the FX 8350, while those with the lowest binning are made for the FX 8320. This doesn’t mean there aren’t any good options in the FX 8320 lineup, but they’re much less common now. Generally, the FX 8350 tends to overclock better than the 8320, and the FX 8370 offers the best results (I’ve reached 5.5Ghz at 1.55Vcore using an 8370).

Processors I’ve used with FX 8320 have managed speeds from around 4.2Ghz up to 5.0Ghz, so predicting your exact overclock result is impossible.
K
khaledkb_
12-26-2016, 03:55 AM #4

Every processor increases its speed in its own way. Claiming you can easily reach 4.5Ghz without problems isn't realistic. The outcome really comes down to your performance in the chip selection process. Certain FX 8320 models struggle to exceed 4.2Ghz, while others easily surpass 5Ghz—it all depends on your specific chip. Still, if your processor performed well in the chip lottery, you have the necessary components to achieve 4.5Ghz.

Overclocking relies heavily on binning. The top-performing FX processors are built for the FX 8370 and FX 9xxx series. Lower-binned chips are designed for the FX 8350, while those with the lowest binning are made for the FX 8320. This doesn’t mean there aren’t any good options in the FX 8320 lineup, but they’re much less common now. Generally, the FX 8350 tends to overclock better than the 8320, and the FX 8370 offers the best results (I’ve reached 5.5Ghz at 1.55Vcore using an 8370).

Processors I’ve used with FX 8320 have managed speeds from around 4.2Ghz up to 5.0Ghz, so predicting your exact overclock result is impossible.

L
livtheviking
Posting Freak
846
12-26-2016, 04:54 PM
#5
Redneck5439 explains that processor overclocking varies widely. Achieving stable speeds around 4.5Ghz isn't guaranteed—it hinges on your chip's performance in the selection process. Some chips can reach 4.2Ghz or more, while others may only hit 5Ghz, depending entirely on your specific component. He notes that having the right cooling solution is essential, recommending a 212 EVO or a high-end Cryorig cooler for optimal results, especially with an H100 for top-tier cooling. He mentions testing several coolers on his FX 8370 setup.
L
livtheviking
12-26-2016, 04:54 PM #5

Redneck5439 explains that processor overclocking varies widely. Achieving stable speeds around 4.5Ghz isn't guaranteed—it hinges on your chip's performance in the selection process. Some chips can reach 4.2Ghz or more, while others may only hit 5Ghz, depending entirely on your specific component. He notes that having the right cooling solution is essential, recommending a 212 EVO or a high-end Cryorig cooler for optimal results, especially with an H100 for top-tier cooling. He mentions testing several coolers on his FX 8370 setup.

H
Homiak1986
Junior Member
22
01-03-2017, 03:14 AM
#6
Tradesman1 continues the discussion about processor overclocking, noting that results vary widely based on individual chip performance. He emphasizes the importance of chip selection in determining how well a processor can be overclocked. He mentions that certain FX 8320 models struggle to reach higher speeds while others achieve impressive results, highlighting the role of binning in performance. He also shares personal experience with FX 8320s reaching speeds between 4.2Ghz and 5.0Ghz, stressing that each processor's potential is unique.

Regarding cooling solutions, he suggests considering alternatives to the 212 EVO for better value or performance, recommending a 212 EVO or a H& from Cryorig for improved cooling at a lower cost. He mentions testing various coolers on his FX 8370 setup and notes that the H60 liquid cooler performs well, possibly even slightly better than the 212 in cooling efficiency.
H
Homiak1986
01-03-2017, 03:14 AM #6

Tradesman1 continues the discussion about processor overclocking, noting that results vary widely based on individual chip performance. He emphasizes the importance of chip selection in determining how well a processor can be overclocked. He mentions that certain FX 8320 models struggle to reach higher speeds while others achieve impressive results, highlighting the role of binning in performance. He also shares personal experience with FX 8320s reaching speeds between 4.2Ghz and 5.0Ghz, stressing that each processor's potential is unique.

Regarding cooling solutions, he suggests considering alternatives to the 212 EVO for better value or performance, recommending a 212 EVO or a H& from Cryorig for improved cooling at a lower cost. He mentions testing various coolers on his FX 8370 setup and notes that the H60 liquid cooler performs well, possibly even slightly better than the 212 in cooling efficiency.

J
Jem01
Member
80
01-03-2017, 11:58 PM
#7
The EVO scores slightly under H100, while sitting above H60 and H80.
J
Jem01
01-03-2017, 11:58 PM #7

The EVO scores slightly under H100, while sitting above H60 and H80.

J
josiecatz__10
Senior Member
640
01-04-2017, 03:38 AM
#8
Tradesman1 shares that the EVO performs slightly under a H100 but surpasses H60 and H80 models. The Hyper 212 EVO stands out as the top budget cooler, even outperforming pricier options. Its efficiency increases significantly with a second fan in a push-pull setup.
J
josiecatz__10
01-04-2017, 03:38 AM #8

Tradesman1 shares that the EVO performs slightly under a H100 but surpasses H60 and H80 models. The Hyper 212 EVO stands out as the top budget cooler, even outperforming pricier options. Its efficiency increases significantly with a second fan in a push-pull setup.

H
hunchmuffin6
Member
209
01-06-2017, 03:40 AM
#9
Tradesman1:
The EVO scores a bit under H100 but tops H60 and H80. The Hyper 212 EVO stands out as the top budget cooler, even surpassing pricier options. Its performance shines more when paired with an additional fan in a push-pull setup.
😀
On Saturday (boxing day) while shopping for a cooler, I found the 212 out of stock (expected), leaving me to pick between the hyper T4, H60 and other pricier liquid coolers, some even costing $200 with extra lighting. The H60 was also $20 cheaper.
H
hunchmuffin6
01-06-2017, 03:40 AM #9

Tradesman1:
The EVO scores a bit under H100 but tops H60 and H80. The Hyper 212 EVO stands out as the top budget cooler, even surpassing pricier options. Its performance shines more when paired with an additional fan in a push-pull setup.
😀
On Saturday (boxing day) while shopping for a cooler, I found the 212 out of stock (expected), leaving me to pick between the hyper T4, H60 and other pricier liquid coolers, some even costing $200 with extra lighting. The H60 was also $20 cheaper.

B
Bella0810
Member
129
01-06-2017, 06:31 AM
#10
Redneck5439 shared their experience with the EVO cooler, noting it performs slightly below a H100 but above H60 and H80 models. They found the Hyper 212 EVO to be the top budget option, even surpassing pricier alternatives. Adding a second fan in a push-pull setup boosts its performance further. On Saturday, during a purchase, they discovered the 212 was sold out, leaving them with choices between the hyper T4, H60, and more expensive models. The H60 offered a $20 discount compared to others. They mentioned that with suitable hardware, the EVO could reach around 4.2 to 4.4Ghz, potentially up to 4.5Ghz depending on the setup.
B
Bella0810
01-06-2017, 06:31 AM #10

Redneck5439 shared their experience with the EVO cooler, noting it performs slightly below a H100 but above H60 and H80 models. They found the Hyper 212 EVO to be the top budget option, even surpassing pricier alternatives. Adding a second fan in a push-pull setup boosts its performance further. On Saturday, during a purchase, they discovered the 212 was sold out, leaving them with choices between the hyper T4, H60, and more expensive models. The H60 offered a $20 discount compared to others. They mentioned that with suitable hardware, the EVO could reach around 4.2 to 4.4Ghz, potentially up to 4.5Ghz depending on the setup.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next