Gtx 960 paired with GTA 5

Pages (2): 1 2 Next

edgobro
Junior Member

02-24-2017, 03:53 AM

You recently purchased an EVGA GXT 960 4GB SSC graphics card for your gaming setup. The components include an AMD FX-6300, 16GB 1600 RAM, GTX 960, and a 1TB Toshiba SSD. You're facing issues such as stuttering and FPS drops. Someone can assist you with these problems—unless you're running at ultra settings, your current configuration might be the cause.

edgobro

02-24-2017, 03:53 AM #1

MinecraftMegan
Member

02-24-2017, 08:30 AM

Don't stress, I played GTA 5 on a 650 Ti with 2GB RAM at 50 frames per second—until the graphics card failed! Let me know if it helps.

MinecraftMegan

02-24-2017, 08:30 AM #2

Don't stress, I played GTA 5 on a 650 Ti with 2GB RAM at 50 frames per second—until the graphics card failed! Let me know if it helps.

Gey123
Junior Member

02-25-2017, 08:34 PM

It seems like you're suggesting the FX 6300 as a likely candidate.

Gey123

02-25-2017, 08:34 PM #3

It seems like you're suggesting the FX 6300 as a likely candidate.

Lagoudale
Member

02-26-2017, 01:58 AM

It might be the CPU hindering your GTX 960's performance. With an i3-4150 and a GTX 960, you could achieve around 50-60 frames per second at 1080p using medium to high settings.

Lagoudale

02-26-2017, 01:58 AM #4

It might be the CPU hindering your GTX 960's performance. With an i3-4150 and a GTX 960, you could achieve around 50-60 frames per second at 1080p using medium to high settings.

MrsInvicta
Junior Member

03-03-2017, 10:47 AM

Occasionally individuals require a CPU with an overclock, perhaps around 4.5Ghz or even 4.8Ghz.

MrsInvicta

03-03-2017, 10:47 AM #5

Occasionally individuals require a CPU with an overclock, perhaps around 4.5Ghz or even 4.8Ghz.

Angellr
Member

03-03-2017, 01:18 PM

It doesn't always assist, particularly when the performance per core in the FX lineup is quite low compared to Intel options. Still, trying it out might be worthwhile.

Angellr

03-03-2017, 01:18 PM #6

It doesn't always assist, particularly when the performance per core in the FX lineup is quite low compared to Intel options. Still, trying it out might be worthwhile.

Kaptenrickard
Junior Member

03-03-2017, 02:21 PM

Generally, AMD CPUs are considered subpar.

Kaptenrickard

03-03-2017, 02:21 PM #7

Generally, AMD CPUs are considered subpar.

Seer413
Member

120

03-03-2017, 03:19 PM

They aren't completely accurate; each serves a function.

Seer413

03-03-2017, 03:19 PM #8

They aren't completely accurate; each serves a function.

Turquose
Member

198

03-10-2017, 06:02 PM

Possibly, though these chips serve many functions!

Turquose

03-10-2017, 06:02 PM #9

Possibly, though these chips serve many functions!

C4Reeper
Junior Member

03-11-2017, 06:26 PM

#10

The AMD CPUs are actually quite reliable. I've been using one for a year without any issues. My plan is to upgrade to the FX-8350 soon.

C4Reeper

03-11-2017, 06:26 PM #10

The AMD CPUs are actually quite reliable. I've been using one for a year without any issues. My plan is to upgrade to the FX-8350 soon.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next