F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking GTx 750Ti overclocking.

GTx 750Ti overclocking.

GTx 750Ti overclocking.

C
catrkill
Member
126
05-19-2016, 12:19 AM
#1
I attempted to boost my MSI GTX 750Ti's performance by overclocking, spending roughly two hours adjusting the valley benchmark and tweaking core and memory clocks until the system either crashed or displayed unusual visuals. From the stock settings, the core clock was 1176Mhz and the memory clock 2700Mhz, while the overclocked values reached 1421Mhz and 2945Mhz respectively. I also modified the fan curve to prevent overheating, which caused the core clock to jump between 1408 and 1421. I haven’t adjusted the core voltage yet, as I’m unsure if it could harm the GPU. My main concern is whether this overclock will actually improve performance and if the effort is justified by the benefits. I’m also wondering if further adjustments are necessary and what the optimal core voltage would be.
C
catrkill
05-19-2016, 12:19 AM #1

I attempted to boost my MSI GTX 750Ti's performance by overclocking, spending roughly two hours adjusting the valley benchmark and tweaking core and memory clocks until the system either crashed or displayed unusual visuals. From the stock settings, the core clock was 1176Mhz and the memory clock 2700Mhz, while the overclocked values reached 1421Mhz and 2945Mhz respectively. I also modified the fan curve to prevent overheating, which caused the core clock to jump between 1408 and 1421. I haven’t adjusted the core voltage yet, as I’m unsure if it could harm the GPU. My main concern is whether this overclock will actually improve performance and if the effort is justified by the benefits. I’m also wondering if further adjustments are necessary and what the optimal core voltage would be.

I
imthebestpanda
Junior Member
16
05-19-2016, 02:49 PM
#2
Xenone :
After half an hour of playing on stock and overlocked clocks, here are the findings:
Stock clock:
GPU Tempture:
Min: 54C Max: 61C
FPS:
Min: 43 Max: 49
Overclocked (crash occurred in first 5 minutes, so I reduced memory and core by 2Mhz; no further crashes):
GPU Tempture
Min: 60C Max: 72C
FPS:
Min: 49 Max: 62
I found my minimum FPS when overclocked to be essentially the highest on stock clocks. The temptures are higher, but nothing alarming. I believe the performance will be very slight and noticeable difference, though I noticed the game ran much smoother. The card is significantly more capable than my clocks, but for now it’s sufficient.
I
imthebestpanda
05-19-2016, 02:49 PM #2

Xenone :
After half an hour of playing on stock and overlocked clocks, here are the findings:
Stock clock:
GPU Tempture:
Min: 54C Max: 61C
FPS:
Min: 43 Max: 49
Overclocked (crash occurred in first 5 minutes, so I reduced memory and core by 2Mhz; no further crashes):
GPU Tempture
Min: 60C Max: 72C
FPS:
Min: 49 Max: 62
I found my minimum FPS when overclocked to be essentially the highest on stock clocks. The temptures are higher, but nothing alarming. I believe the performance will be very slight and noticeable difference, though I noticed the game ran much smoother. The card is significantly more capable than my clocks, but for now it’s sufficient.

J
JGbb
Member
163
05-19-2016, 04:26 PM
#3
The GTX 750Ti offers a strong performance-to-cost ratio, though it falls short compared to more powerful cards. It performs well for budget-conscious players. After applying your overclock, its capabilities are impressive; I was surprised by how effectively it could be overclocked. Although this approach may reduce its lifespan, it suggests the 750Ti will remain a suitable option only for budget gamers temporarily, before higher-end models like the 950 become necessary.
J
JGbb
05-19-2016, 04:26 PM #3

The GTX 750Ti offers a strong performance-to-cost ratio, though it falls short compared to more powerful cards. It performs well for budget-conscious players. After applying your overclock, its capabilities are impressive; I was surprised by how effectively it could be overclocked. Although this approach may reduce its lifespan, it suggests the 750Ti will remain a suitable option only for budget gamers temporarily, before higher-end models like the 950 become necessary.

K
kittymitty69
Member
190
05-20-2016, 06:49 AM
#4
The GTX 750Ti offers a strong performance-to-cost ratio, making it suitable for budget builds compared to more expensive cards. After overclocking, its performance is quite impressive, and I was surprised by how well it handled the boost. Although it may reduce its lifespan, it seems this model will remain popular among budget gamers for some time before newer models like the 950 become necessary. You could try increasing the core voltage if you wish, but overclocking already provides sufficient results.

I'm currently studying computer engineering and required a compact, affordable PC that I could easily move between home and college. I ended up with a Dell Optiplex 960 SFF because its case is significantly larger than a standard laptop screen. My main concern is ensuring the GPU lasts at least two years, which matches my course duration, after which I plan to sell it. I managed to achieve a memory clock of 3002Mhz without issues, but temperatures rose steadily until reaching 82°C. At that point, I had to halt the run because it wouldn't stabilize further—likely due to the compact case design. If the card were in a standard ATX case with adequate cooling, it might have handled higher core clocks. I tested the benchmarks for ten minutes and maintained consistent results. Since my requirement is only two years of use, I'm prepared to push the card further, as the 750Ti typically lasts 6-7 years on stock clocks.
K
kittymitty69
05-20-2016, 06:49 AM #4

The GTX 750Ti offers a strong performance-to-cost ratio, making it suitable for budget builds compared to more expensive cards. After overclocking, its performance is quite impressive, and I was surprised by how well it handled the boost. Although it may reduce its lifespan, it seems this model will remain popular among budget gamers for some time before newer models like the 950 become necessary. You could try increasing the core voltage if you wish, but overclocking already provides sufficient results.

I'm currently studying computer engineering and required a compact, affordable PC that I could easily move between home and college. I ended up with a Dell Optiplex 960 SFF because its case is significantly larger than a standard laptop screen. My main concern is ensuring the GPU lasts at least two years, which matches my course duration, after which I plan to sell it. I managed to achieve a memory clock of 3002Mhz without issues, but temperatures rose steadily until reaching 82°C. At that point, I had to halt the run because it wouldn't stabilize further—likely due to the compact case design. If the card were in a standard ATX case with adequate cooling, it might have handled higher core clocks. I tested the benchmarks for ten minutes and maintained consistent results. Since my requirement is only two years of use, I'm prepared to push the card further, as the 750Ti typically lasts 6-7 years on stock clocks.

P
PedroO_
Senior Member
522
05-20-2016, 10:41 AM
#5
Yeah, I think the clock speeds fluctuating is typical. But the card is built to handle around 80c, so that shouldn't be a big problem. As long as it stays under 70c, I wouldn't be too concerned. Overall, it should last you about two years. For gaming it might not last much longer, but for everyday use and engineering it shouldn't be a major issue.

Anyway, everything seems okay. Cooling is still better, which allows a bit more overclocking, though the difference won't be huge—maybe a 1-2% boost at most.
P
PedroO_
05-20-2016, 10:41 AM #5

Yeah, I think the clock speeds fluctuating is typical. But the card is built to handle around 80c, so that shouldn't be a big problem. As long as it stays under 70c, I wouldn't be too concerned. Overall, it should last you about two years. For gaming it might not last much longer, but for everyday use and engineering it shouldn't be a major issue.

Anyway, everything seems okay. Cooling is still better, which allows a bit more overclocking, though the difference won't be huge—maybe a 1-2% boost at most.

A
alonu726
Junior Member
3
05-20-2016, 12:06 PM
#6
The problem lies in the extremely tiny case size. I used my friend's thermal camera and when the CPU was under heavy load (Xeon X3323), the fans pushed hot air directly into the 750ti case. I observed that the CPU's hot air cycled six times through the 750ti before it finally escaped. My gaming PC is a HP Pavilion P6 series, with the PCI slot positioned above the CPU. I installed the GTX 980 inside it, and never experienced this issue before. This led me to consider water cooling for the 750ti since it runs on an EVGA 430W 80 silver power supply. The PSU is large enough to be mounted sideways onto the case, allowing space for water cooling components. However, there are no water blocks available for the 750ti because they typically don't reach high temperatures, making water cooling impractical unless someone has a fully water-cooled system and wants to integrate the 750ti into their setup. I haven’t tested the stock heatsink yet, so I’m unsure if generic options exist.
A
alonu726
05-20-2016, 12:06 PM #6

The problem lies in the extremely tiny case size. I used my friend's thermal camera and when the CPU was under heavy load (Xeon X3323), the fans pushed hot air directly into the 750ti case. I observed that the CPU's hot air cycled six times through the 750ti before it finally escaped. My gaming PC is a HP Pavilion P6 series, with the PCI slot positioned above the CPU. I installed the GTX 980 inside it, and never experienced this issue before. This led me to consider water cooling for the 750ti since it runs on an EVGA 430W 80 silver power supply. The PSU is large enough to be mounted sideways onto the case, allowing space for water cooling components. However, there are no water blocks available for the 750ti because they typically don't reach high temperatures, making water cooling impractical unless someone has a fully water-cooled system and wants to integrate the 750ti into their setup. I haven’t tested the stock heatsink yet, so I’m unsure if generic options exist.

X
xSudden
Member
228
05-20-2016, 01:32 PM
#7
After playing the game for half an hour on stock clock and overlocked clocks, here are the findings:

Stock clock:
GPU Tempture:
Min: 54C Max: 61C
FPS:
Min: 43 Max: 49
Overclocked (crash occurred in first 5 minutes, so I reduced memory and core by 2Mhz; no further crashes):
GPU Tempture
Min: 60C Max: 72C
FPS:
Min: 49 Max: 62

I noticed my minimum FPS when overclocked was the highest on stock clocks. The temptures are slightly higher, but nothing concerning. I’m satisfied with the performance; the game runs much smoother after overclocking. My cards are more powerful than the clocks, but for now it’s sufficient. I plan to keep it at max for future self-learning, though it’s fine as is right now.
X
xSudden
05-20-2016, 01:32 PM #7

After playing the game for half an hour on stock clock and overlocked clocks, here are the findings:

Stock clock:
GPU Tempture:
Min: 54C Max: 61C
FPS:
Min: 43 Max: 49
Overclocked (crash occurred in first 5 minutes, so I reduced memory and core by 2Mhz; no further crashes):
GPU Tempture
Min: 60C Max: 72C
FPS:
Min: 49 Max: 62

I noticed my minimum FPS when overclocked was the highest on stock clocks. The temptures are slightly higher, but nothing concerning. I’m satisfied with the performance; the game runs much smoother after overclocking. My cards are more powerful than the clocks, but for now it’s sufficient. I plan to keep it at max for future self-learning, though it’s fine as is right now.

G
GigiCakes
Senior Member
261
05-20-2016, 05:08 PM
#8
Xenone :
After spending half an hour playing on stock and overlocked clocks, here are the findings:
Stock clock:
GPU Tempture:
Min: 54C Max: 61C
FPS:
Min: 43 Max: 49
Overclocked (crash occurred in first 5 minutes, so I reduced memory and core by 2Mhz; no further crashes):
GPU Tempture
Min: 60C Max: 72C
FPS:
Min: 49 Max: 62
I found my minimum FPS when overclocked to be essentially the highest on stock clocks. The temptures are higher, but nothing alarming. I believe the game ran much smoother after overclocking; the card is significantly more powerful than my clocks. For now it’s sufficient, and I might consider pushing it further for learning in the future. It definitely shows you have a very capable GTX 750Ti, with a noticeable FPS boost during overclocking and stable performance without raising core voltage. Great job!
G
GigiCakes
05-20-2016, 05:08 PM #8

Xenone :
After spending half an hour playing on stock and overlocked clocks, here are the findings:
Stock clock:
GPU Tempture:
Min: 54C Max: 61C
FPS:
Min: 43 Max: 49
Overclocked (crash occurred in first 5 minutes, so I reduced memory and core by 2Mhz; no further crashes):
GPU Tempture
Min: 60C Max: 72C
FPS:
Min: 49 Max: 62
I found my minimum FPS when overclocked to be essentially the highest on stock clocks. The temptures are higher, but nothing alarming. I believe the game ran much smoother after overclocking; the card is significantly more powerful than my clocks. For now it’s sufficient, and I might consider pushing it further for learning in the future. It definitely shows you have a very capable GTX 750Ti, with a noticeable FPS boost during overclocking and stable performance without raising core voltage. Great job!