F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop GTX 1070 with 8GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 5 1600 showing slow performance

GTX 1070 with 8GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 5 1600 showing slow performance

GTX 1070 with 8GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 5 1600 showing slow performance

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
Skipper22778
Member
197
09-22-2017, 10:50 PM
#1
Hey there, I see you're having trouble with your PC performance. It sounds like your current setup isn't delivering the best possible frame rates, especially in games like Witcher 3. Your friend has a similar CPU but a weaker GPU and achieves higher FPS. You might want to consider upgrading your memory if it's not already sufficient for smooth gameplay. Let me know if you need more details!
S
Skipper22778
09-22-2017, 10:50 PM #1

Hey there, I see you're having trouble with your PC performance. It sounds like your current setup isn't delivering the best possible frame rates, especially in games like Witcher 3. Your friend has a similar CPU but a weaker GPU and achieves higher FPS. You might want to consider upgrading your memory if it's not already sufficient for smooth gameplay. Let me know if you need more details!

R
RG48
Posting Freak
778
09-29-2017, 12:26 PM
#2
Ryzen prioritizes memory bandwidth, but this setup limits it. If a friend had an 8GB RAM stick, you could try it to check for significant gains.
R
RG48
09-29-2017, 12:26 PM #2

Ryzen prioritizes memory bandwidth, but this setup limits it. If a friend had an 8GB RAM stick, you could try it to check for significant gains.

K
kip1113
Member
129
09-29-2017, 09:15 PM
#3
Great to hear! Just checking if your RAM settings are optimal for performance. Let me know if you need more tips!
K
kip1113
09-29-2017, 09:15 PM #3

Great to hear! Just checking if your RAM settings are optimal for performance. Let me know if you need more tips!

S
Sonicgill
Member
57
10-06-2017, 11:16 AM
#4
You're seeing a slower performance with the current setup. On the budget side, it's often straightforward to locate 2x8GB DDR4 3000 modules. For better options, you can look into DDR4 2800 or 2933 models, though they're less common. If you're willing to invest a bit more, DDR4 3200 offers improved speeds, but keep in mind that early Ryzen chips don't handle higher frequencies as well as newer ones, making 3000 a reliable choice.
S
Sonicgill
10-06-2017, 11:16 AM #4

You're seeing a slower performance with the current setup. On the budget side, it's often straightforward to locate 2x8GB DDR4 3000 modules. For better options, you can look into DDR4 2800 or 2933 models, though they're less common. If you're willing to invest a bit more, DDR4 3200 offers improved speeds, but keep in mind that early Ryzen chips don't handle higher frequencies as well as newer ones, making 3000 a reliable choice.

J
jonioni11
Member
55
10-06-2017, 01:38 PM
#5
choose something affordable with identical features—brand isn't the only concern
J
jonioni11
10-06-2017, 01:38 PM #5

choose something affordable with identical features—brand isn't the only concern

T
timo_1892
Senior Member
715
10-07-2017, 08:36 PM
#6
It's clearly the RAM issue, especially since it's quite slow and only uses a single channel. That's a real problem.
T
timo_1892
10-07-2017, 08:36 PM #6

It's clearly the RAM issue, especially since it's quite slow and only uses a single channel. That's a real problem.

B
bookier
Junior Member
42
10-09-2017, 09:13 PM
#7
Single channel usage limits bandwidth significantly, similar to hitting the knee with a bullet on a Ryzen. Even though single channel RAM isn't advised for Intel, it severely restricts performance for Ryzen. I'd opt for a solid 2x8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport BLS2K8G4D32AESBK setup if I were in charge. Where are you located?
B
bookier
10-09-2017, 09:13 PM #7

Single channel usage limits bandwidth significantly, similar to hitting the knee with a bullet on a Ryzen. Even though single channel RAM isn't advised for Intel, it severely restricts performance for Ryzen. I'd opt for a solid 2x8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport BLS2K8G4D32AESBK setup if I were in charge. Where are you located?

G
Goldensoul133
Member
129
10-10-2017, 04:42 PM
#8
Sure, here we go!
G
Goldensoul133
10-10-2017, 04:42 PM #8

Sure, here we go!

B
baris070x
Junior Member
49
10-14-2017, 11:09 AM
#9
Croatia, Zagreb
B
baris070x
10-14-2017, 11:09 AM #9

Croatia, Zagreb

A
AtomicPC
Member
62
10-25-2017, 07:55 PM
#10
You're likely to encounter the Ballistix LT BLS2K8G4D32AESBK in Hungary, which is the most favored choice there. The lowest performance I observed was limited to 3466Mhz OC C16... Typically they reach 3600Mhz CL16 with Zen+, and even up to 3800Mhz with Zen2 and Intel. For older Ryzen models, it should be feasible to run at 3400Mhz CL16 or cl14. "Micron-E die" – search it online. The slight drops in FPS (0.1-1%) will noticeably improve, and overall performance will rise considerably. A smart investment.
A
AtomicPC
10-25-2017, 07:55 PM #10

You're likely to encounter the Ballistix LT BLS2K8G4D32AESBK in Hungary, which is the most favored choice there. The lowest performance I observed was limited to 3466Mhz OC C16... Typically they reach 3600Mhz CL16 with Zen+, and even up to 3800Mhz with Zen2 and Intel. For older Ryzen models, it should be feasible to run at 3400Mhz CL16 or cl14. "Micron-E die" – search it online. The slight drops in FPS (0.1-1%) will noticeably improve, and overall performance will rise considerably. A smart investment.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next