F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Gtx 1070 ti vs rtx 2060

Gtx 1070 ti vs rtx 2060

Gtx 1070 ti vs rtx 2060

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
S
s0x0n
Junior Member
42
07-04-2019, 08:02 PM
#11
EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO ULTRA gaming paired with MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti VENTUS 6GB.
S
s0x0n
07-04-2019, 08:02 PM #11

EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO ULTRA gaming paired with MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti VENTUS 6GB.

F
Fuzytiger
Member
192
07-24-2019, 10:51 AM
#12
The RTX 2060 isn't ideal for ray tracing unless you're playing Minecraft.
F
Fuzytiger
07-24-2019, 10:51 AM #12

The RTX 2060 isn't ideal for ray tracing unless you're playing Minecraft.

L
Luca190407
Junior Member
3
07-27-2019, 12:29 PM
#13
The 2060 KO stands above most other 2060 options in video editing thanks to a reduced GPU die using a premium GPU, rather than the standard 2060 GPU. It offers similar gaming performance while providing marginally better workstation capabilities, making it a worthwhile option to think about.
L
Luca190407
07-27-2019, 12:29 PM #13

The 2060 KO stands above most other 2060 options in video editing thanks to a reduced GPU die using a premium GPU, rather than the standard 2060 GPU. It offers similar gaming performance while providing marginally better workstation capabilities, making it a worthwhile option to think about.

O
ohRealize
Member
71
08-16-2019, 10:52 PM
#14
I own the 2060 KO along with a GTX1080; it runs about 10% faster. The cooler on the 2060 is actually mediocre, so if I were to pick again now I’d opt for a 2060S with a better one. Spend roughly 100€ more, but it’ll be worthwhile.
O
ohRealize
08-16-2019, 10:52 PM #14

I own the 2060 KO along with a GTX1080; it runs about 10% faster. The cooler on the 2060 is actually mediocre, so if I were to pick again now I’d opt for a 2060S with a better one. Spend roughly 100€ more, but it’ll be worthwhile.

C
Carteroxx
Member
198
08-27-2019, 05:29 AM
#15
The most suitable choice depends on your priorities, but overall it seems the best path is to carefully evaluate all factors before deciding.
C
Carteroxx
08-27-2019, 05:29 AM #15

The most suitable choice depends on your priorities, but overall it seems the best path is to carefully evaluate all factors before deciding.

T
Twanneman81
Member
92
08-27-2019, 06:35 AM
#16
The outcome relies significantly on the tools you employ and the quality of the video you're working with
T
Twanneman81
08-27-2019, 06:35 AM #16

The outcome relies significantly on the tools you employ and the quality of the video you're working with

T
TheWarlord23
Member
194
08-27-2019, 08:16 AM
#17
I’d consider the EVGA 2060 KO if you’re looking for older models. It seems Gamers Nexus hinted that newer releases aren’t simply replacing the T104 line.
T
TheWarlord23
08-27-2019, 08:16 AM #17

I’d consider the EVGA 2060 KO if you’re looking for older models. It seems Gamers Nexus hinted that newer releases aren’t simply replacing the T104 line.

D
daniel10724
Junior Member
20
09-04-2019, 06:45 AM
#18
It seems you're unsure if it's a newer investment, so consider getting the 1070 TI if it isn't already.
D
daniel10724
09-04-2019, 06:45 AM #18

It seems you're unsure if it's a newer investment, so consider getting the 1070 TI if it isn't already.

R
Redbuilder17
Junior Member
7
09-06-2019, 03:48 AM
#19
Mine handles bf5 well at high resolutions with adjusted configurations on 1440p at 75hz. Freesync works and it rarely drops below 70fps. Personally, I’m not a competitive player; I don’t require over 120 fps or low settings for minimal latency and fewer hiding spots for opponents. I’m just enjoying the visuals in impressive moments. It bothers me when others dismiss it as ineffective simply because it struggles to hit 144hz on 4K, especially with RTX hardware they dislike. Back then, bf5 RTX could run at around 60fps in 1080p, but improvements in drivers and engine tuning have made a big difference. The newer DLSS or similar technologies help a lot, improving performance at 1440p. Maybe a version that maintains 2ghz consistently would be better for me.

However, I’m keen on having RTX enabled hardware for development, which is why I chose it. For casual play: yes, it functions smoothly and looks great when it performs well. But if you’re just looking at it as a game, the difference might be negligible unless you notice it every few seconds. If you’re open to waiting, I’d prefer a model in the 3000 series or newer so prices drop and performance improves.

But a RTX card that isn’t suitable for ray tracing feels a bit unrealistic, even for a 2060 model. It’s similar to saying an older 1060 couldn’t handle modern rendering—it just doesn’t fit the current standards.
R
Redbuilder17
09-06-2019, 03:48 AM #19

Mine handles bf5 well at high resolutions with adjusted configurations on 1440p at 75hz. Freesync works and it rarely drops below 70fps. Personally, I’m not a competitive player; I don’t require over 120 fps or low settings for minimal latency and fewer hiding spots for opponents. I’m just enjoying the visuals in impressive moments. It bothers me when others dismiss it as ineffective simply because it struggles to hit 144hz on 4K, especially with RTX hardware they dislike. Back then, bf5 RTX could run at around 60fps in 1080p, but improvements in drivers and engine tuning have made a big difference. The newer DLSS or similar technologies help a lot, improving performance at 1440p. Maybe a version that maintains 2ghz consistently would be better for me.

However, I’m keen on having RTX enabled hardware for development, which is why I chose it. For casual play: yes, it functions smoothly and looks great when it performs well. But if you’re just looking at it as a game, the difference might be negligible unless you notice it every few seconds. If you’re open to waiting, I’d prefer a model in the 3000 series or newer so prices drop and performance improves.

But a RTX card that isn’t suitable for ray tracing feels a bit unrealistic, even for a 2060 model. It’s similar to saying an older 1060 couldn’t handle modern rendering—it just doesn’t fit the current standards.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2