F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking GT 220 overclocking bug

GT 220 overclocking bug

GT 220 overclocking bug

R
Rottenbaby13
Member
62
11-30-2016, 12:39 AM
#1
I'm trying to overclock my GT 220 but it seems MSI Afterburner might be faulty or my GPU isn't allowing overclocking. The software works without issues, yet whenever I attempt to adjust the memory or core clocks, they accept the speeds and save without changes. The side clocks remain unchanged and unaffected by the progress bars in the middle. Temperatures stay steady around 405MHz and 324MHz. However, after about 30 seconds, the left side meter updates to the desired overclock speed but then reverts back to 405/324. I've tried updating the driver and using an older one, but nothing helps. The DDU display driver was removed, yet performance and temperatures remain normal. It appears MSI might be handling it correctly. Any advice would be appreciated? Thanks in advance!
R
Rottenbaby13
11-30-2016, 12:39 AM #1

I'm trying to overclock my GT 220 but it seems MSI Afterburner might be faulty or my GPU isn't allowing overclocking. The software works without issues, yet whenever I attempt to adjust the memory or core clocks, they accept the speeds and save without changes. The side clocks remain unchanged and unaffected by the progress bars in the middle. Temperatures stay steady around 405MHz and 324MHz. However, after about 30 seconds, the left side meter updates to the desired overclock speed but then reverts back to 405/324. I've tried updating the driver and using an older one, but nothing helps. The DDU display driver was removed, yet performance and temperatures remain normal. It appears MSI might be handling it correctly. Any advice would be appreciated? Thanks in advance!

D
Dan_playz_MC
Senior Member
461
11-30-2016, 02:23 AM
#2
Consider removing Afterburner and then reinstalling it. Also attempt to update the graphics driver once more. Obtain and install the graphics driver directly from the provided link. When updating, select Custom and the clean install option. Additionally, test with some of the earlier drivers. I have been using version 391.24 since last spring.
D
Dan_playz_MC
11-30-2016, 02:23 AM #2

Consider removing Afterburner and then reinstalling it. Also attempt to update the graphics driver once more. Obtain and install the graphics driver directly from the provided link. When updating, select Custom and the clean install option. Additionally, test with some of the earlier drivers. I have been using version 391.24 since last spring.

K
216
12-04-2016, 10:50 PM
#3
Consider removing Afterburner and then reinstalling it. Also attempt to update the graphics driver once more. Download and set up the graphics driver directly from the provided link. Use Custom with the clean install feature during updates. I've already tried these steps without success. I've also used the NVIDIA auto detect driver installer, but it didn't work initially. The 342.00 update also failed to install properly, though 342.01 was rejected for some reason. I've installed MSI Afterburner multiple times without any benefit. Are there other alternatives you recommend?
K
KingdomClasher
12-04-2016, 10:50 PM #3

Consider removing Afterburner and then reinstalling it. Also attempt to update the graphics driver once more. Download and set up the graphics driver directly from the provided link. Use Custom with the clean install feature during updates. I've already tried these steps without success. I've also used the NVIDIA auto detect driver installer, but it didn't work initially. The 342.00 update also failed to install properly, though 342.01 was rejected for some reason. I've installed MSI Afterburner multiple times without any benefit. Are there other alternatives you recommend?

V
V4L3N73
Member
209
12-09-2016, 07:46 PM
#4
You might want to explore the EVGA overclock app.
https://www.evga.com/precisionxoc/
Alternatively, Asus Tweak 2 could be a good option. It seems simpler compared to the others.
V
V4L3N73
12-09-2016, 07:46 PM #4

You might want to explore the EVGA overclock app.
https://www.evga.com/precisionxoc/
Alternatively, Asus Tweak 2 could be a good option. It seems simpler compared to the others.

S
Superub
Member
241
12-14-2016, 11:27 AM
#5
you should implement a task that utilizes the GPU, since you might see power reductions from minimal GPU activity
still, the processor should run at approximately 600MHz, and it would work well with nvidia bios editor
S
Superub
12-14-2016, 11:27 AM #5

you should implement a task that utilizes the GPU, since you might see power reductions from minimal GPU activity
still, the processor should run at approximately 600MHz, and it would work well with nvidia bios editor

T
TheKingHaz
Member
59
12-14-2016, 02:38 PM
#6
You can explore the EVGA overclock app.
https://www.evga.com/precisionxoc/
Asus Tweak 2 might be a better option. It's simpler than the others.
I've just used the EVGA Overlocking program, though I found it difficult to download and set up. It doesn't seem to work.
I also tried Gigabyte OC Guru II, but it didn't help either.
T
TheKingHaz
12-14-2016, 02:38 PM #6

You can explore the EVGA overclock app.
https://www.evga.com/precisionxoc/
Asus Tweak 2 might be a better option. It's simpler than the others.
I've just used the EVGA Overlocking program, though I found it difficult to download and set up. It doesn't seem to work.
I also tried Gigabyte OC Guru II, but it didn't help either.

J
Jarzzermann
Posting Freak
788
12-15-2016, 02:24 PM
#7
The system needs a solution that utilizes the GPU for better power efficiency, possibly achieving around 600MHz clock speed. Consider using Nvidia BIOS tools like the Nvidia Bios Editor to test overclocking, though it may not be available in your current setup.
J
Jarzzermann
12-15-2016, 02:24 PM #7

The system needs a solution that utilizes the GPU for better power efficiency, possibly achieving around 600MHz clock speed. Consider using Nvidia BIOS tools like the Nvidia Bios Editor to test overclocking, though it may not be available in your current setup.

H
Heinagin
Junior Member
6
12-15-2016, 03:04 PM
#8
The GT 220 is a basic graphics card. You might not find much room for speed adjustments. I haven't used this one before, so I'm unsure about its overclocking options.
H
Heinagin
12-15-2016, 03:04 PM #8

The GT 220 is a basic graphics card. You might not find much room for speed adjustments. I haven't used this one before, so I'm unsure about its overclocking options.

F
fyrephlie
Junior Member
11
12-15-2016, 07:40 PM
#9
It's a GT, not GTX. A lot of them are locked. Even with heavy overclocking, you'd only get a 5% boost at the highest settings.
Consider a better second-hand card—something like 750, 650, 660, or 550. You can find a used 750 for about $50, and it would be five times faster.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4...kw=GTX+650
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvi...162vsm7737
F
fyrephlie
12-15-2016, 07:40 PM #9

It's a GT, not GTX. A lot of them are locked. Even with heavy overclocking, you'd only get a 5% boost at the highest settings.
Consider a better second-hand card—something like 750, 650, 660, or 550. You can find a used 750 for about $50, and it would be five times faster.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4...kw=GTX+650
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvi...162vsm7737

A
augustb19907
Senior Member
456
12-16-2016, 11:53 AM
#10
Zebarjadi.raouf shares his thoughts on the situation. He mentions it's a GT model, not GTX, and most units are locked. Even with heavy overclocking, you'd only see a 5% improvement at maximum. He suggests considering a better second-hand card, such as a 750, 650, 660, or 550, noting that a used 750 could cost around $50 and be five times faster. He provides a link to a comparison page and a benchmark result for the GTX 750 versus the GeForce GT-220. He also expresses his intention not to spend money right now but still has ideas about what GPU to purchase next, mentioning he recently stopped overclocking overall.
A
augustb19907
12-16-2016, 11:53 AM #10

Zebarjadi.raouf shares his thoughts on the situation. He mentions it's a GT model, not GTX, and most units are locked. Even with heavy overclocking, you'd only see a 5% improvement at maximum. He suggests considering a better second-hand card, such as a 750, 650, 660, or 550, noting that a used 750 could cost around $50 and be five times faster. He provides a link to a comparison page and a benchmark result for the GTX 750 versus the GeForce GT-220. He also expresses his intention not to spend money right now but still has ideas about what GPU to purchase next, mentioning he recently stopped overclocking overall.