F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Give this outdated machine a fresh start.

Give this outdated machine a fresh start.

Give this outdated machine a fresh start.

H
HenriqueOL
Junior Member
33
06-28-2016, 05:59 PM
#1
Hey, focusing on the main points, I own an older laptop that still works fine but is slowing down. It’s an Intel Celeron 1007U with 1.50GHz and 6GB RAM, no graphics card—just a simple setup. The build quality is decent, especially compared to many other Asus models, and the design is nice. I’m planning to switch from Windows 10 to Linux for smoother performance and more control. Since I mainly use it for browsing, word docs, Eclipse, and Skype, I need a lightweight Linux that won’t drain the battery or slow things down. Dual-booting both OSes might not be ideal due to speed differences, so upgrading to Linux alone seems like the better path for efficiency and longevity.
H
HenriqueOL
06-28-2016, 05:59 PM #1

Hey, focusing on the main points, I own an older laptop that still works fine but is slowing down. It’s an Intel Celeron 1007U with 1.50GHz and 6GB RAM, no graphics card—just a simple setup. The build quality is decent, especially compared to many other Asus models, and the design is nice. I’m planning to switch from Windows 10 to Linux for smoother performance and more control. Since I mainly use it for browsing, word docs, Eclipse, and Skype, I need a lightweight Linux that won’t drain the battery or slow things down. Dual-booting both OSes might not be ideal due to speed differences, so upgrading to Linux alone seems like the better path for efficiency and longevity.

I
IvyTheCat
Member
208
06-29-2016, 02:11 PM
#2
I run the latest Ubuntu on lesser hardware and its still fine. Make sure it has a SSD if it doesn't already.
I
IvyTheCat
06-29-2016, 02:11 PM #2

I run the latest Ubuntu on lesser hardware and its still fine. Make sure it has a SSD if it doesn't already.

C
CSA_Thomas
Junior Member
16
07-04-2016, 03:29 AM
#3
Yes, Ubuntu would be a good choice to ease the burden... but an SSD would really boost performance. Just verify the SSD size fits your laptop before purchasing, and opt for a budget-friendly option if you can.
C
CSA_Thomas
07-04-2016, 03:29 AM #3

Yes, Ubuntu would be a good choice to ease the burden... but an SSD would really boost performance. Just verify the SSD size fits your laptop before purchasing, and opt for a budget-friendly option if you can.

K
Kakashi_420
Junior Member
18
07-04-2016, 04:55 AM
#4
Using a minimal distro like Xubuntu or Lubuntu can help keep things light and efficient.
K
Kakashi_420
07-04-2016, 04:55 AM #4

Using a minimal distro like Xubuntu or Lubuntu can help keep things light and efficient.

H
heroboy17
Senior Member
528
07-05-2016, 05:47 AM
#5
To achieve the best performance, I recommend downloading CloudReady's ChromiumOS. I set it up on an older netbook that had a slower processor and less memory than the original, and it now handles tasks like streaming at 720p smoothly without buffering or noticeable frame drops, and 1080p with only slight delays.
H
heroboy17
07-05-2016, 05:47 AM #5

To achieve the best performance, I recommend downloading CloudReady's ChromiumOS. I set it up on an older netbook that had a slower processor and less memory than the original, and it now handles tasks like streaming at 720p smoothly without buffering or noticeable frame drops, and 1080p with only slight delays.

M
MrEv15425
Member
122
07-06-2016, 04:09 PM
#6
I suggest choosing the Long Term Support release of Ubuntu; presently this version is 16.04. Ubuntu originates from Debian and the key distinctions lie in how Debian releases every 2-3 years while Ubuntu typically offers updates every 6 months or every two years as LTS. Generally, you receive more recent kernel and hardware support with Ubuntu, whereas Debian tends to be more dependable and consistent. A nice alternative deserves a nod for Fedora, developed by Red Hat; it features Gnome 3 and likely follows a 6-month update schedule. If Unity or Gnome 3 feels too sluggish, there are lighter desktop environments available. You can install the same lightweight managers—such as XFCE and LXDE—onto your current setup. Mate is popular for those seeking a minimal interface, running on Gnome 2 and resembling a MacOS feel. You don’t have to install every possible variant; simply select one of Ubuntu, Fedora, or Debian and pick your preferred desktop environment after installation. As noted in my comment, Gnome 3 and Unity perform exceptionally well only when installed on an SSD.
M
MrEv15425
07-06-2016, 04:09 PM #6

I suggest choosing the Long Term Support release of Ubuntu; presently this version is 16.04. Ubuntu originates from Debian and the key distinctions lie in how Debian releases every 2-3 years while Ubuntu typically offers updates every 6 months or every two years as LTS. Generally, you receive more recent kernel and hardware support with Ubuntu, whereas Debian tends to be more dependable and consistent. A nice alternative deserves a nod for Fedora, developed by Red Hat; it features Gnome 3 and likely follows a 6-month update schedule. If Unity or Gnome 3 feels too sluggish, there are lighter desktop environments available. You can install the same lightweight managers—such as XFCE and LXDE—onto your current setup. Mate is popular for those seeking a minimal interface, running on Gnome 2 and resembling a MacOS feel. You don’t have to install every possible variant; simply select one of Ubuntu, Fedora, or Debian and pick your preferred desktop environment after installation. As noted in my comment, Gnome 3 and Unity perform exceptionally well only when installed on an SSD.

M
MrCm
Senior Member
636
07-06-2016, 09:37 PM
#7
Here’s a fresh take on your ideas:

You can really blend Windows and Linux side by side without major speed drops—just keep in mind that each OS takes up less space, which is the main downside. The real slowdown happens when you rely heavily on an SSD; otherwise, performance stays solid.

Regarding updates, Microsoft has been quite inconsistent lately, sometimes swapping Linux bootloaders for Windows updates without clear reason. This issue pops up occasionally and can usually be resolved in under fifteen minutes. That’s one of the trade-offs with newer Microsoft policies.

For a smoother experience, consider choosing a distribution that matches your preferred desktop environment rather than jumping straight into Ubuntu and adding a desktop later. If you’re sticking with Ubuntu, lean toward lighter options.

Unless you’re deeply invested in a particular look, skip Unity and GNOME. They can feel heavy and often clash with other distros. Instead, try LXDE → XFCE → Mate → KDE Plasma, prioritizing lightness but staying true to your favorite desktop. These choices vary only slightly in performance, making them practical for everyday use.

For a quick setup, a used Dell Precision M65 (2007-08) with Intel T700, 1GHz boosted to 2GHz, 2GB RAM, and a Quadro FX350M GPU paired with a 120GB hard drive running Arch and Plasma would work well. You’d get around 500MB of idle RAM and comfortably handle 5-6 tabs with 720p video.

If you’re looking for desktop options:

- **LXDE** → **LXLE** (for extra tweaks while keeping low resource use)
- **XFCE** → **Xubuntu**
- **Mate** → **Mint, Ubuntu, Fedora, or Manjato** (depending on your taste)
- **KDE Plasma** → **KDE Neon**

These suggestions are just a starting point—what matters most is what feels right for you. Always test them with a Live USB before committing.

For laptop longevity, sticking to Linux can definitely help extend its life.
M
MrCm
07-06-2016, 09:37 PM #7

Here’s a fresh take on your ideas:

You can really blend Windows and Linux side by side without major speed drops—just keep in mind that each OS takes up less space, which is the main downside. The real slowdown happens when you rely heavily on an SSD; otherwise, performance stays solid.

Regarding updates, Microsoft has been quite inconsistent lately, sometimes swapping Linux bootloaders for Windows updates without clear reason. This issue pops up occasionally and can usually be resolved in under fifteen minutes. That’s one of the trade-offs with newer Microsoft policies.

For a smoother experience, consider choosing a distribution that matches your preferred desktop environment rather than jumping straight into Ubuntu and adding a desktop later. If you’re sticking with Ubuntu, lean toward lighter options.

Unless you’re deeply invested in a particular look, skip Unity and GNOME. They can feel heavy and often clash with other distros. Instead, try LXDE → XFCE → Mate → KDE Plasma, prioritizing lightness but staying true to your favorite desktop. These choices vary only slightly in performance, making them practical for everyday use.

For a quick setup, a used Dell Precision M65 (2007-08) with Intel T700, 1GHz boosted to 2GHz, 2GB RAM, and a Quadro FX350M GPU paired with a 120GB hard drive running Arch and Plasma would work well. You’d get around 500MB of idle RAM and comfortably handle 5-6 tabs with 720p video.

If you’re looking for desktop options:

- **LXDE** → **LXLE** (for extra tweaks while keeping low resource use)
- **XFCE** → **Xubuntu**
- **Mate** → **Mint, Ubuntu, Fedora, or Manjato** (depending on your taste)
- **KDE Plasma** → **KDE Neon**

These suggestions are just a starting point—what matters most is what feels right for you. Always test them with a Live USB before committing.

For laptop longevity, sticking to Linux can definitely help extend its life.