Ghost Recon BreakPoint
Ghost Recon BreakPoint
also thinking about it right now. wildlands was fun but have you seen the performance benchmarks on breakpoint? god damn. just when i thought i was ahead with my hardware they do it again. stats say i can expect 40 fps on ultrawide 1440p and setting on ultra (not even the highest setting). and i just oced my poor 1080 ti. idk i think ill definitely get it but maybe i'll wait a bit until prices come down
Reached 135 hours in Wildlands today. Didn’t even consider buying Breakpoint until it reached $10.00, which was the price I paid for Wildlands a month and a half ago. Ultra is for those who don’t care. You can boost that 40 fps just by tweaking the graphics settings.
After checking the reviews, I decided to hold off on purchasing it until it becomes available at a discount. I’d like to examine your graphics and display options. I use a CRG9 ultra wide for DIvision 2, and most settings are optimal except a few adjustments that keep me at around 70+ frames on a 49 in 32:9. Just tweak a few things and a 1080p display will work well! I’m still playing division and moving into Diablo III.
I really wished for another triple A game to enjoy on PC.
Well that's exactly what they tested with their benchmark, so it's the only data I have. First of all, it's still lower than my resolution and I'm using a 2080ti, so how am I comparing to me?
https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Tom-Clanc...s-1333798/ (German site, sorry)
But as you can see at my resolution, the 1080ti runs at 40fps and that's with a 9900k clock speed which I don't have, so mine might even be slower. Maybe adjusting the settings could help without too much loss in quality, but I just can't accept finding a higher setting available and not using it. It could have looked better, but I can't get it. I'm not going back to playing on low settings anymore.
It's always possible to adjust the settings slightly for a noticeable improvement without affecting image quality too much.
The game hasn't been released for a week yet, give people more time to share data. There are methods to adjust settings while maintaining quality. You need to evaluate your choices carefully. Record how much VRAM, CPU, GPU usage or FPS each setting consumes. This typically involves playing the game yourself. Avoid presets. Study each graphic setting's impact on performance and visuals. Then decide based on what suits you best. For instance, do you really require shadows in certain games that maintain around 20 FPS? Not all games use them, and many players prefer them. In Ghost Recon Wildlands, surprisingly, I don't need shadows—the game performs better and looks better without them. 65 FPS with shadows versus 85 FPS without shadows: which do you prefer?
Are you using 4K resolution? I'm using a Samsung C49RG90 (5120 x 1440p). This isn't the 1080p model (CHG90). My display is handling over 7 million pixels in an extremely wide format, which makes performance challenging. Still, yes, I think my GPU is better than yours; though a 1080ti is still capable. With the right tweaks, you should get solid performance in most games without compromising visual quality. I understand the frustration of having to lower settings, but it might just be a minor issue that doesn't really impact your experience.
I don’t really mean presets, but most quality choices are marked with low, medium, high or similar. That makes it simpler than explaining every setting I usually use. Yes, I definitely need shadows. Green blobs render much faster, and shadows are especially important in games like this. Removing them makes it look like GTA 5 on a console. Games like this are eye-catching to me, and any AAA title is eye-catching for me. The ones I don’t mind graphics on are usually the easiest to run, so it doesn’t really matter. Like Counter-Strike or something similar.
I can generally tolerate minimal to no AA, but in Wildlands for example, all the vegetation makes it look like 50s TV static without any AA. So I use temporal. I could go through them all, but I think you get my point—most of them are key factors except motion blur... I hate motion blur.
Oh, and I’ve played games at lower than native resolution before so I can keep the rest at higher settings. For instance, on my 4K TV I don’t play often there, but when I do, it’s usually 1080p because I can’t tell the difference from where I’m sitting, but I can definitely tell if shadows are present.