F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Get guidance on setting up your network plan.

Get guidance on setting up your network plan.

Get guidance on setting up your network plan.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
L
littlefish418
Junior Member
11
12-21-2016, 08:22 PM
#11
You might consider this option. It’s a reasonable beginning. Acquire the MoCA 2.5 units; it offers a solid improvement over the 2.0 version and comes at a lower cost. The main compatibility concerns I’ve heard about with MoCA are related to the 1.0 release, which sometimes clashed with certain cable providers. There’s also a compatibility issue with satellite TV, but that’s not an issue for you.
L
littlefish418
12-21-2016, 08:22 PM #11

You might consider this option. It’s a reasonable beginning. Acquire the MoCA 2.5 units; it offers a solid improvement over the 2.0 version and comes at a lower cost. The main compatibility concerns I’ve heard about with MoCA are related to the 1.0 release, which sometimes clashed with certain cable providers. There’s also a compatibility issue with satellite TV, but that’s not an issue for you.

J
jonttutonttu1
Member
214
12-21-2016, 09:01 PM
#12
You can anticipate significantly faster speeds with four nanohd’s versus four AP AC pros.
J
jonttutonttu1
12-21-2016, 09:01 PM #12

You can anticipate significantly faster speeds with four nanohd’s versus four AP AC pros.

R
RageGlitch
Posting Freak
771
12-22-2016, 05:34 AM
#13
Regarding nanoHD versus AC-Pro, the choice hinges on your number of MU-MIMO clients and how many devices connect to each access point. If fewer than 8-10 devices per AP are active, the difference may be negligible.
R
RageGlitch
12-22-2016, 05:34 AM #13

Regarding nanoHD versus AC-Pro, the choice hinges on your number of MU-MIMO clients and how many devices connect to each access point. If fewer than 8-10 devices per AP are active, the difference may be negligible.

H
Hqrambqe
Member
136
12-24-2016, 09:31 PM
#14
It would cost less than eight to ten points on the AP, but it’s $120 more for four nano’s compared to four pro’s. I’ll ask you, in your own view, whether it’s worth the extra $120 for future-proofing.
H
Hqrambqe
12-24-2016, 09:31 PM #14

It would cost less than eight to ten points on the AP, but it’s $120 more for four nano’s compared to four pro’s. I’ll ask you, in your own view, whether it’s worth the extra $120 for future-proofing.

D
DarkTiger427
Member
186
01-13-2017, 01:28 PM
#15
For budget-friendly options, choose the AC Lite. For better performance, the AC Pro isn’t worth it unless you’re willing to pay more. If you have patience, the Unifi Wifi 6 APs are promising and may become even more attractive after they launch.
D
DarkTiger427
01-13-2017, 01:28 PM #15

For budget-friendly options, choose the AC Lite. For better performance, the AC Pro isn’t worth it unless you’re willing to pay more. If you have patience, the Unifi Wifi 6 APs are promising and may become even more attractive after they launch.

S
Suthurnbel
Member
182
01-15-2017, 03:59 AM
#16
It's disappointing waiting three to nine months, especially since it's essential for our holiday decorations' smart equipment. Appreciate the details about the NanoHD; I'll factor that into my decision.
S
Suthurnbel
01-15-2017, 03:59 AM #16

It's disappointing waiting three to nine months, especially since it's essential for our holiday decorations' smart equipment. Appreciate the details about the NanoHD; I'll factor that into my decision.

T
ToxicPanda97
Junior Member
12
01-19-2017, 09:42 AM
#17
Would one nanoHD device suffice to cover a 1000 square foot area?
T
ToxicPanda97
01-19-2017, 09:42 AM #17

Would one nanoHD device suffice to cover a 1000 square foot area?

G
godfreydtm
Member
214
01-20-2017, 07:12 PM
#18
In a fully open space it works, but not in typical homes. No single AP or router can provide coverage at 5GHz. Remember, half the Wi-Fi is the AP talking to your phone, and the other half is your phone sending to the AP. The real issue is usually the radio or antenna on your devices. Devices claiming strong signals don’t always mean a great experience. The Unifi controller displays the signal levels APs receive from your clients, which is more relevant.
G
godfreydtm
01-20-2017, 07:12 PM #18

In a fully open space it works, but not in typical homes. No single AP or router can provide coverage at 5GHz. Remember, half the Wi-Fi is the AP talking to your phone, and the other half is your phone sending to the AP. The real issue is usually the radio or antenna on your devices. Devices claiming strong signals don’t always mean a great experience. The Unifi controller displays the signal levels APs receive from your clients, which is more relevant.

Z
Ziegelcraft
Member
58
01-24-2017, 03:16 AM
#19
I haven't used them personally, but BeaconHD access points can help cover gaps in weak WiFi signals when you already have other UniFi devices close by. Just need a power source; no Ethernet cabling required. Be aware, speed won't match a dedicated AP since some bandwidth is used for communication between APs. Would you have thought about getting advice from a company that can design a plan after visiting the site?
Z
Ziegelcraft
01-24-2017, 03:16 AM #19

I haven't used them personally, but BeaconHD access points can help cover gaps in weak WiFi signals when you already have other UniFi devices close by. Just need a power source; no Ethernet cabling required. Be aware, speed won't match a dedicated AP since some bandwidth is used for communication between APs. Would you have thought about getting advice from a company that can design a plan after visiting the site?

Z
zombag9
Junior Member
20
01-24-2017, 10:27 AM
#20
Z
zombag9
01-24-2017, 10:27 AM #20

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next