F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking FX 8350 bad overclock?

FX 8350 bad overclock?

FX 8350 bad overclock?

N
nunbora_
Junior Member
14
03-23-2017, 05:05 PM
#1
I currently possess an FX 8350 running at stock speed, 4Ghz (which turbo's to 4.2), paired with a Noctua nh-u12s cooler and a Gigabyte 970a-d3p motherboard. I also have a Coolermaster Thunder 600w power supply. This configuration is almost three years old, and if I were to rebuild it now, things would likely have been handled differently. When trying to overclock the CPU at stock voltage (1.35v), I reach a maximum of 4.3Ghz stable without issues like a blue screen (4.4 if lucky). Increasing to 1.375v only gives me 4.4 Ghz stable, but temperatures go above 60°C in my Australian room during summer. Around sunset in October, outside temps are around 30°C. Any advice? Should I anticipate higher overclocks?
N
nunbora_
03-23-2017, 05:05 PM #1

I currently possess an FX 8350 running at stock speed, 4Ghz (which turbo's to 4.2), paired with a Noctua nh-u12s cooler and a Gigabyte 970a-d3p motherboard. I also have a Coolermaster Thunder 600w power supply. This configuration is almost three years old, and if I were to rebuild it now, things would likely have been handled differently. When trying to overclock the CPU at stock voltage (1.35v), I reach a maximum of 4.3Ghz stable without issues like a blue screen (4.4 if lucky). Increasing to 1.375v only gives me 4.4 Ghz stable, but temperatures go above 60°C in my Australian room during summer. Around sunset in October, outside temps are around 30°C. Any advice? Should I anticipate higher overclocks?

D
dutchmcsebas
Member
69
03-23-2017, 05:29 PM
#2
I'm worried about trying to optimize this model with OC settings. The VRM isn't sufficient for a serious upgrade on an 8-core processor, regardless of the cooling method. Or if you're targeting 4.6 to 4.7GHz, you'd need around 1.5 volts or more, which would require over 160 watts—far beyond what the VRM can provide.
D
dutchmcsebas
03-23-2017, 05:29 PM #2

I'm worried about trying to optimize this model with OC settings. The VRM isn't sufficient for a serious upgrade on an 8-core processor, regardless of the cooling method. Or if you're targeting 4.6 to 4.7GHz, you'd need around 1.5 volts or more, which would require over 160 watts—far beyond what the VRM can provide.

D
DerpyLOL
Member
131
04-06-2017, 03:37 AM
#3
Based on what I understand, these outcomes match typical performance from other FX CPUs. You can achieve greater overclocks by increasing voltage, though you'll also require a more effective cooler.
D
DerpyLOL
04-06-2017, 03:37 AM #3

Based on what I understand, these outcomes match typical performance from other FX CPUs. You can achieve greater overclocks by increasing voltage, though you'll also require a more effective cooler.

M
MineFloYT
Member
190
04-06-2017, 05:34 AM
#4
I'm worried about trying to optimize this model with OC settings. The VRM isn't sufficient for a serious upgrade on an 8-core processor, regardless of the cooling method. Or if you're targeting 4.6 to 4.7GHz, you'd need around 1.5 volts or more, which would require over 160 watts—something the VRM can't provide.
M
MineFloYT
04-06-2017, 05:34 AM #4

I'm worried about trying to optimize this model with OC settings. The VRM isn't sufficient for a serious upgrade on an 8-core processor, regardless of the cooling method. Or if you're targeting 4.6 to 4.7GHz, you'd need around 1.5 volts or more, which would require over 160 watts—something the VRM can't provide.