F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming FSX Using only 10% of my GPU Power?

FSX Using only 10% of my GPU Power?

FSX Using only 10% of my GPU Power?

G
Grumpycat17
Junior Member
13
03-20-2016, 11:51 AM
#1
I've just set up Windows 10 on my system and added the FSX game via DVDs. The issue is that the game only uses about 3 to 10% of the GPU power, while the GPU is still operating at full capacity. I'm getting only 30 to 50 frames per second, which is frustrating. I've applied both Service Pack 1 and Service Pack 2 for FSX, but it didn't make much difference. The game ran a bit smoother, around 60 FPS, using just 10% of the GPU. Someone might help me, as I suspect the problem relates to Windows 10 and DirectX 12. I'm running a GTX 750 Ti.
G
Grumpycat17
03-20-2016, 11:51 AM #1

I've just set up Windows 10 on my system and added the FSX game via DVDs. The issue is that the game only uses about 3 to 10% of the GPU power, while the GPU is still operating at full capacity. I'm getting only 30 to 50 frames per second, which is frustrating. I've applied both Service Pack 1 and Service Pack 2 for FSX, but it didn't make much difference. The game ran a bit smoother, around 60 FPS, using just 10% of the GPU. Someone might help me, as I suspect the problem relates to Windows 10 and DirectX 12. I'm running a GTX 750 Ti.

P
PicoChoco
Junior Member
20
03-20-2016, 07:43 PM
#2
You get very little benefit from FSX since it lacks strong optimization for computers...
P
PicoChoco
03-20-2016, 07:43 PM #2

You get very little benefit from FSX since it lacks strong optimization for computers...

M
MehSparky
Member
193
03-21-2016, 01:03 AM
#3
FSX is an old game needing roughly 1 GHz per 10 frames from your CPU. It demands minimal power from your graphics card, which is a drawback. Microsoft made a big mistake a decade ago, thinking the GPU would be less crucial than the CPU. At that time, GPUs typically held 64 to 256 MB of RAM. Who could have predicted 12 GB in under ten years? Still, I believe it's time for FSX2. It’s currently only for PCs.
M
MehSparky
03-21-2016, 01:03 AM #3

FSX is an old game needing roughly 1 GHz per 10 frames from your CPU. It demands minimal power from your graphics card, which is a drawback. Microsoft made a big mistake a decade ago, thinking the GPU would be less crucial than the CPU. At that time, GPUs typically held 64 to 256 MB of RAM. Who could have predicted 12 GB in under ten years? Still, I believe it's time for FSX2. It’s currently only for PCs.

S
Serana569
Junior Member
18
03-21-2016, 04:26 AM
#4
Despite having an oc'd g3258 up to 5ghz, it continues to perform poorly.
S
Serana569
03-21-2016, 04:26 AM #4

Despite having an oc'd g3258 up to 5ghz, it continues to perform poorly.

M
Morvaxx
Member
153
03-21-2016, 09:56 AM
#5
You're referring to a performance that feels sluggish compared to expectations. Despite the hardware being upgraded, it still lags noticeably, especially at higher frame rates. The consistent low to medium refresh rate suggests it's not optimized for fast-paced action. Running it at 75 Hz or more would likely worsen the experience. It's not a game demanding high performance, but it's definitely not ideal either.
M
Morvaxx
03-21-2016, 09:56 AM #5

You're referring to a performance that feels sluggish compared to expectations. Despite the hardware being upgraded, it still lags noticeably, especially at higher frame rates. The consistent low to medium refresh rate suggests it's not optimized for fast-paced action. Running it at 75 Hz or more would likely worsen the experience. It's not a game demanding high performance, but it's definitely not ideal either.

T
tonnmode
Member
50
03-24-2016, 01:59 AM
#6
Consider testing everything at maximum settings. You'll notice the frame rate decreases afterward. Doveshit didn't make any improvements to the Steam version.
T
tonnmode
03-24-2016, 01:59 AM #6

Consider testing everything at maximum settings. You'll notice the frame rate decreases afterward. Doveshit didn't make any improvements to the Steam version.

A
Angelgq
Junior Member
5
03-29-2016, 07:59 AM
#7
I believe I made a correction... switched the resolution to 4K. It performs better at 30 FPS compared to 1080P.
A
Angelgq
03-29-2016, 07:59 AM #7

I believe I made a correction... switched the resolution to 4K. It performs better at 30 FPS compared to 1080P.