F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop For those who keep discussing Corsair Vengeance RGB, check this out...

For those who keep discussing Corsair Vengeance RGB, check this out...

For those who keep discussing Corsair Vengeance RGB, check this out...

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
T
tetriad
Member
203
08-24-2021, 06:32 PM
#21
The article discusses how AMD has significantly boosted DDR5 support for the 8000MHz. It explains the concept in simple terms and mentions possible connections to ASRock motherboards or the AM5 platform, though it’s unclear exactly which part it refers to.
T
tetriad
08-24-2021, 06:32 PM #21

The article discusses how AMD has significantly boosted DDR5 support for the 8000MHz. It explains the concept in simple terms and mentions possible connections to ASRock motherboards or the AM5 platform, though it’s unclear exactly which part it refers to.

W
Wibbolink
Junior Member
7
09-15-2021, 03:19 AM
#22
For an AMD configuration? Try GSkill Trident Z5 Neo 6000CL30 RGB – their color options are top-notch for AMD builds.
W
Wibbolink
09-15-2021, 03:19 AM #22

For an AMD configuration? Try GSkill Trident Z5 Neo 6000CL30 RGB – their color options are top-notch for AMD builds.

O
OreoPro124420
Member
199
09-15-2021, 04:03 AM
#23
We can operate a single stick of DDR5 while maintaining full performance.
O
OreoPro124420
09-15-2021, 04:03 AM #23

We can operate a single stick of DDR5 while maintaining full performance.

I
iNaomiPlays
Senior Member
609
09-16-2021, 05:34 PM
#24
AM5 boards are commonly available, with ASRock being the initial vendor to release a beta BIOS supporting the AGESA version that resolved 2:1 mode. Key points include that 1:1 offers lower memory latency but limits maximum speed, whereas 2:1 provides higher speeds at the cost of much greater latency. If you push the memory clock high enough, the latency issue can be mitigated, but stability becomes problematic once you reach those higher speeds. Outside visual examples and the X670E Gene, it’s best to steer clear of 2:1 mode if performance matters. Each stick has dual channels, but each channel on a memory stick is essentially half a channel (32-bit instead of the usual 64-bit per stick). To achieve two DIMMs for dual dual or quad channels, you need a dual dual or quad setup. No one refers to 2x16GB quad channel in DDR5, even though technically possible, because odd channel counts don’t work and it’s just a habit.
I
iNaomiPlays
09-16-2021, 05:34 PM #24

AM5 boards are commonly available, with ASRock being the initial vendor to release a beta BIOS supporting the AGESA version that resolved 2:1 mode. Key points include that 1:1 offers lower memory latency but limits maximum speed, whereas 2:1 provides higher speeds at the cost of much greater latency. If you push the memory clock high enough, the latency issue can be mitigated, but stability becomes problematic once you reach those higher speeds. Outside visual examples and the X670E Gene, it’s best to steer clear of 2:1 mode if performance matters. Each stick has dual channels, but each channel on a memory stick is essentially half a channel (32-bit instead of the usual 64-bit per stick). To achieve two DIMMs for dual dual or quad channels, you need a dual dual or quad setup. No one refers to 2x16GB quad channel in DDR5, even though technically possible, because odd channel counts don’t work and it’s just a habit.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3