For players with 8350 and R9 280/X, share your FPS results in these games!
For players with 8350 and R9 280/X, share your FPS results in these games!
Here are some games you might enjoy and their typical FPS ratings based on your build:
- **Valorant** – ~60 FPS
- **Apex Legends** – ~60 FPS
- **Overwatch 2** – ~60 FPS
- **Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III** – ~60 FPS
- **Fortnite** – ~60–70 FPS
- **CS:GO / Counter-Strike: Global Offensive** – ~50–55 FPS
Let me know if you want more details!
I don’t own those parts, but I’m familiar with the 280X delivering solid frame rates—around 60 FPS at 1080p High in most titles. A few games hit about 53 FPS, while others perform better. As for why someone might pick a CPU Any instead of an i5, it often comes down to specific performance needs or budget considerations.
You're running a powerful setup with the FX 6300 + 280x, which should give you solid performance. Planetside 2 (maybe not ideal for AMD) consistently hits 65+ FPS on ultra settings. Heroes & Villains reach 80+ FPS maxed, while BH3 maintains 55-65 FPS. All emulator titles run smoothly above 100 FPS. Modded games like Minecraft can hit 80 FPS with Optifine (using 7GB RAM). Warframe stutters to about 52 FPS, Ghost Recon maxes at 72 FPS, and Titanfall reaches 68 FPS. BF hardline stays around 68 FPS. War Thunder on cinematic mode drops to 50 FPS. Overall, you're averaging around 60 FPS across many titles, with some games pushing higher.
65+ fps when there's not much of a fight going on I guess,right? I sometimes dip into 20-30fps during zergs (CPU-limited) with my 4670k. Seriously, Planetside2 was the reason I overclocked my CPU.
LGA 1150 supports future upgrades. While some prefer fewer powerful cores (i5/i7), others favor more modest ones. Many in the community agree with this view.
In tough zones I only manage about 15 frames per second, so I keep the game running at least 45 FPS. Since I’m playing as a medic and doing light attacks, I stay in the front or in the air.