For anyone working with AutoCad, multi-core performance plays a crucial role in efficiency.
For anyone working with AutoCad, multi-core performance plays a crucial role in efficiency.
You're looking to balance performance and cost for someone who mainly uses AutoCad and similar software. With the Intel Core i3 4460, a dual-core processor might be sufficient unless you anticipate heavy multitasking or demanding design work. Since your current build already has a quad-core CPU, adding another dual-core could complicate things without significant benefit. A budget-friendly upgrade to a 4-core processor like the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X or Intel Core i5-10400 would likely offer better value for the price. Alternatively, sticking with the dual-core i3 could work if your workflow stays light. Consider the monitor setup and whether extra cores will really make a difference in this use case.
He’s running his PC with a few AutoCad tabs and Word documents using about 5 gigabytes of RAM. You seem familiar with this, so I’ll check out an 8GB system with an i5. To be completely honest, I’m aiming for a good price on an 16GB setup and fitting an i5 that uses around 6 gigabytes. It’s a bit ambitious, but worth hoping for.
I grasp the concept of RAM well. I've been attempting to fit a 128 or 266 GB SSD into the design too (hoping for a strong performance on Black Friday). If that's the case, then I'll add a 6 GB pagefile to that SSD as well. My suggested configuration should include an i5 4460 (or 4690k if funds permit), 8 GB of RAM, and ideally a 128+ GB SSD paired with a 1 TB WD Blue drive.
No real need for 4690K, you would need like a z series mobo that way. If you are tight on money get B85, H81 or H87,H97 and non-overclockable i5.
Autodesk Inventor functions quite effectively on my setup. The main constraint is my rapid consumption of 8GB of RAM.