F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Firefox vs Chrome resource usage

Firefox vs Chrome resource usage

Firefox vs Chrome resource usage

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
A
Askatal
Member
223
10-12-2016, 09:53 PM
#11
It's quite quick and uses fewer resources. It works well with slower internet connections, and you can turn on a dithering feature to make websites load faster with less detail.
A
Askatal
10-12-2016, 09:53 PM #11

It's quite quick and uses fewer resources. It works well with slower internet connections, and you can turn on a dithering feature to make websites load faster with less detail.

W
WindOfFlamez
Member
244
10-27-2016, 07:15 AM
#12
Yeah. My brother had this really bad netbook with a lot of RAM, so I had to search for more RAM-friendly browsers. Ended up finding 'green browser,' which is kind of like IE.
W
WindOfFlamez
10-27-2016, 07:15 AM #12

Yeah. My brother had this really bad netbook with a lot of RAM, so I had to search for more RAM-friendly browsers. Ended up finding 'green browser,' which is kind of like IE.

C
cookiegal1410
Member
219
10-27-2016, 10:41 AM
#13
The image doesn't convey any information since we lack details about the extensions and tabs in Chrome, including their versions.
C
cookiegal1410
10-27-2016, 10:41 AM #13

The image doesn't convey any information since we lack details about the extensions and tabs in Chrome, including their versions.

M
Micky_CT
Member
146
10-28-2016, 10:20 PM
#14
I appreciate how seamlessly Google integrates, maintaining my bookmarks and content across all devices while offering smooth access to Google Docs, Drive, and more. The updated YouTube comment system is a big improvement—it functions much better now, which is something no one else has achieved.
M
Micky_CT
10-28-2016, 10:20 PM #14

I appreciate how seamlessly Google integrates, maintaining my bookmarks and content across all devices while offering smooth access to Google Docs, Drive, and more. The updated YouTube comment system is a big improvement—it functions much better now, which is something no one else has achieved.

N
Nienke_2002
Senior Member
621
10-30-2016, 05:43 PM
#15
They aren't exactly the same setup. Various pages and extensions involved, making a direct comparison difficult.
N
Nienke_2002
10-30-2016, 05:43 PM #15

They aren't exactly the same setup. Various pages and extensions involved, making a direct comparison difficult.

T
tydall
Member
137
10-30-2016, 10:36 PM
#16
What interests you most? I don’t have a single thing that stands out better for me.
T
tydall
10-30-2016, 10:36 PM #16

What interests you most? I don’t have a single thing that stands out better for me.

L
levoyageur92
Posting Freak
807
11-07-2016, 12:40 PM
#17
Are you looking for add-ons? Programming and web development? Customization options? I believe FF handles those well.
L
levoyageur92
11-07-2016, 12:40 PM #17

Are you looking for add-ons? Programming and web development? Customization options? I believe FF handles those well.

R
reptarsmash111
Junior Member
11
11-08-2016, 06:29 PM
#18
For someone with moderate experience, Chrome seems to be a stronger choice compared to FF. It offers better stability and a more refined feel, especially since I use Google services often. While personal preferences vary, I don’t really care about the complaints about Chrome being annoying or frustrating.
R
reptarsmash111
11-08-2016, 06:29 PM #18

For someone with moderate experience, Chrome seems to be a stronger choice compared to FF. It offers better stability and a more refined feel, especially since I use Google services often. While personal preferences vary, I don’t really care about the complaints about Chrome being annoying or frustrating.

T
52
11-08-2016, 07:00 PM
#19
Chrome works well too. I just don’t like when people say FF is bad.
T
thebigcheese22
11-08-2016, 07:00 PM #19

Chrome works well too. I just don’t like when people say FF is bad.

D
djninja444
Member
173
11-09-2016, 01:50 AM
#20
I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain... Just go back over my previous comments and consider whether those add-ons really consume over 50 megabytes of RAM. Actually, probably not—just try installing fresh versions of Chrome and Firefox yourself. That way you'll get the real picture without needing me to convince you. I don't want to suggest Chrome bothers me, but honestly, I enjoy both browsers. Still, with a PC that has 2 or 3 gigabytes of RAM, I think it's worth checking if Chrome uses fewer resources than it does when it comes out of the box. Firefox isn't terrible, but Chrome seems to be performing better right now.
D
djninja444
11-09-2016, 01:50 AM #20

I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain... Just go back over my previous comments and consider whether those add-ons really consume over 50 megabytes of RAM. Actually, probably not—just try installing fresh versions of Chrome and Firefox yourself. That way you'll get the real picture without needing me to convince you. I don't want to suggest Chrome bothers me, but honestly, I enjoy both browsers. Still, with a PC that has 2 or 3 gigabytes of RAM, I think it's worth checking if Chrome uses fewer resources than it does when it comes out of the box. Firefox isn't terrible, but Chrome seems to be performing better right now.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next