F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Firefox vs Chrome resource usage

Firefox vs Chrome resource usage

Firefox vs Chrome resource usage

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
X
xXFirewitherXx
Posting Freak
878
08-08-2016, 10:09 PM
#1
I haven't used Firefox in a while, but Chrome bothers me with its constant notifications and numerous desktop apps. So I decided to try Firefox again. What stood out was how much more RAM it consumes compared to Chrome, which surprises me since I recall Firefox being relatively lightweight. I remember it was praised as a light browser, but recent updates with features like desktop notifications and Google integration have made it heavier. I installed around 4 to 5 add-ons in each browser, which is typical. This is my office PC.
X
xXFirewitherXx
08-08-2016, 10:09 PM #1

I haven't used Firefox in a while, but Chrome bothers me with its constant notifications and numerous desktop apps. So I decided to try Firefox again. What stood out was how much more RAM it consumes compared to Chrome, which surprises me since I recall Firefox being relatively lightweight. I remember it was praised as a light browser, but recent updates with features like desktop notifications and Google integration have made it heavier. I installed around 4 to 5 add-ons in each browser, which is typical. This is my office PC.

M
MrAwesome4424
Junior Member
3
08-10-2016, 04:19 AM
#2
Firefox consumes significantly less memory compared to Chrome. I also think it would be great if closing Firefox and restoring your session would load every website and YouTube video smoothly, just like Chrome does. In my opinion, Firefox remains the top web browser.
M
MrAwesome4424
08-10-2016, 04:19 AM #2

Firefox consumes significantly less memory compared to Chrome. I also think it would be great if closing Firefox and restoring your session would load every website and YouTube video smoothly, just like Chrome does. In my opinion, Firefox remains the top web browser.

A
Andreas1900
Member
85
09-01-2016, 03:30 AM
#3
When you sum up the memory Chrome is using, it comes out to be lower than Firefox's in your case. Around 200MB versus Firefox's 231.5MB. Surprisingly, this isn't what many expected given the complaints about Chrome's resource consumption.
A
Andreas1900
09-01-2016, 03:30 AM #3

When you sum up the memory Chrome is using, it comes out to be lower than Firefox's in your case. Around 200MB versus Firefox's 231.5MB. Surprisingly, this isn't what many expected given the complaints about Chrome's resource consumption.

T
TrueMCcrafter
Member
67
09-09-2016, 08:32 AM
#4
Firefox resembles Windows 7 in terms of features and richness, a popular choice among users, though it consumes more resources and operates slower. Chrome mirrors Windows 8.1 in functionality, offering speed and efficiency, but it misses some features and support options.
T
TrueMCcrafter
09-09-2016, 08:32 AM #4

Firefox resembles Windows 7 in terms of features and richness, a popular choice among users, though it consumes more resources and operates slower. Chrome mirrors Windows 8.1 in functionality, offering speed and efficiency, but it misses some features and support options.

Z
zMinatoPvP_
Junior Member
46
09-11-2016, 04:40 AM
#5
I enjoyed opera a lot, and it moves at a speed similar to chrome.
Z
zMinatoPvP_
09-11-2016, 04:40 AM #5

I enjoyed opera a lot, and it moves at a speed similar to chrome.

R
R3voluction
Member
61
09-11-2016, 08:30 AM
#6
Still I have a screenshot showing a different picture. Firefox didn’t quite meet expectations—it’s noticeably slower, uses more RAM even with fewer features, and that’s not what I’d expect. Opera is decent, but Chrome and Firefox both perform better overall. Opera really shined before Chrome and Firefox came along, yet here we are comparing Firefox with Chrome, and I was hoping it would run lighter.
R
R3voluction
09-11-2016, 08:30 AM #6

Still I have a screenshot showing a different picture. Firefox didn’t quite meet expectations—it’s noticeably slower, uses more RAM even with fewer features, and that’s not what I’d expect. Opera is decent, but Chrome and Firefox both perform better overall. Opera really shined before Chrome and Firefox came along, yet here we are comparing Firefox with Chrome, and I was hoping it would run lighter.

B
BooshDev
Member
207
09-19-2016, 08:17 AM
#7
Yes, it appears to be less popular. Does it include any of the code? (Which platform?)
B
BooshDev
09-19-2016, 08:17 AM #7

Yes, it appears to be less popular. Does it include any of the code? (Which platform?)

M
Max5555553436
Junior Member
17
10-10-2016, 02:40 PM
#8
Why are there no separators in those numbers? It really makes reading difficult. Having them in formats like 4*10 or 400,000 would help. Also, there’s no unit on the axis, so we can’t determine the actual value. Who is behind this messy chart? This is seriously concerning.
M
Max5555553436
10-10-2016, 02:40 PM #8

Why are there no separators in those numbers? It really makes reading difficult. Having them in formats like 4*10 or 400,000 would help. Also, there’s no unit on the axis, so we can’t determine the actual value. Who is behind this messy chart? This is seriously concerning.

O
OcelotNinja
Member
116
10-11-2016, 05:14 AM
#9
Employs blink, a Chrome engine created by Google with assistance from Opera. Incorporates parts of Chrome, Android WebKit.
O
OcelotNinja
10-11-2016, 05:14 AM #9

Employs blink, a Chrome engine created by Google with assistance from Opera. Incorporates parts of Chrome, Android WebKit.

R
RAMY26
Junior Member
25
10-12-2016, 08:24 PM
#10
I saw that it usually runs with less memory than Chrome and works faster. It seems to have fewer applications running. Most laptops or desktops should notice a significant performance boost, shouldn't they?
R
RAMY26
10-12-2016, 08:24 PM #10

I saw that it usually runs with less memory than Chrome and works faster. It seems to have fewer applications running. Most laptops or desktops should notice a significant performance boost, shouldn't they?

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next