F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Firefox is struggling on older systems, consuming significant CPU power. Consider switching back to Chromium.

Firefox is struggling on older systems, consuming significant CPU power. Consider switching back to Chromium.

Firefox is struggling on older systems, consuming significant CPU power. Consider switching back to Chromium.

D
dm20_tm
Member
227
12-15-2016, 12:44 AM
#1
While working on an old Asus A3H at college, I faced issues with FireFox. Web pages would load slowly, the CPU ran at full capacity, and frequent restarts were necessary because it was hindering performance. I switched to Chrome but remembered using Chromium on Linux. Installing it made a noticeable improvement—pages loaded faster, CPU usage stayed stable, and RAM consumption remained minimal compared to FireFox. In short, Chromium seems better suited for older systems like the Celeron M380. (I’ll verify this with my Dual Pentium III EB1000.)
D
dm20_tm
12-15-2016, 12:44 AM #1

While working on an old Asus A3H at college, I faced issues with FireFox. Web pages would load slowly, the CPU ran at full capacity, and frequent restarts were necessary because it was hindering performance. I switched to Chrome but remembered using Chromium on Linux. Installing it made a noticeable improvement—pages loaded faster, CPU usage stayed stable, and RAM consumption remained minimal compared to FireFox. In short, Chromium seems better suited for older systems like the Celeron M380. (I’ll verify this with my Dual Pentium III EB1000.)

T
TesGo
Member
85
12-15-2016, 09:38 AM
#2
Midori is quite light on resources. However, chromium could be a better option, just keep an eye on memory consumption.
T
TesGo
12-15-2016, 09:38 AM #2

Midori is quite light on resources. However, chromium could be a better option, just keep an eye on memory consumption.

S
SynR_surfen12
Junior Member
28
12-15-2016, 01:27 PM
#3
Currently, with 12 tabs running across two windows and using just a couple of gigabytes of RAM, it’s showing as quite efficient given the laptop’s 2GB limit—especially since the chipset only supports up to 2GB.
S
SynR_surfen12
12-15-2016, 01:27 PM #3

Currently, with 12 tabs running across two windows and using just a couple of gigabytes of RAM, it’s showing as quite efficient given the laptop’s 2GB limit—especially since the chipset only supports up to 2GB.

I
182
01-05-2017, 06:22 AM
#4
I’ve moved to Chrome on both my primary machine (G3258) and my work computer (Pentium E5200). It’s running smoother than Firefox on either of them—about 1.5GB in speed.
I
iPushObeseKids
01-05-2017, 06:22 AM #4

I’ve moved to Chrome on both my primary machine (G3258) and my work computer (Pentium E5200). It’s running smoother than Firefox on either of them—about 1.5GB in speed.

O
Oufin
Member
74
01-05-2017, 01:08 PM
#5
FireFox has undergone significant changes since version 3., and it's certainly slower now.
O
Oufin
01-05-2017, 01:08 PM #5

FireFox has undergone significant changes since version 3., and it's certainly slower now.

T
TehSprite
Member
56
01-05-2017, 04:36 PM
#6
You've started observing that your Pentium isn't operating at its maximum capacity and isn't being used effectively.
T
TehSprite
01-05-2017, 04:36 PM #6

You've started observing that your Pentium isn't operating at its maximum capacity and isn't being used effectively.

K
Kohwelly
Member
97
01-05-2017, 06:23 PM
#7
I think Chrome might consume more memory as time goes on. Please confirm if that's correct.
K
Kohwelly
01-05-2017, 06:23 PM #7

I think Chrome might consume more memory as time goes on. Please confirm if that's correct.

N
NooahFNA
Junior Member
42
01-05-2017, 08:04 PM
#8
N
NooahFNA
01-05-2017, 08:04 PM #8

X
163
01-06-2017, 03:54 AM
#9
This feature relies on memory tied to the page content.
X
XExtremeGamerX
01-06-2017, 03:54 AM #9

This feature relies on memory tied to the page content.