F5F Stay Refreshed Software General Software Find a hidden file with a password to get it out of an invisible folder

Find a hidden file with a password to get it out of an invisible folder

Find a hidden file with a password to get it out of an invisible folder

B
batabing47
Member
60
09-07-2026, 04:18 PM
#1
Does it make sense to put an encrypted file inside another encrypted file? For instance: putting "Encrypted Word.doc" into a folder called "Files.rar" with password 567, and then putting that whole package again into another archive named "Files2.rar" with password 1234. I'm doing this because I want to add more protection so hackers can't crack my first layer of security (password 1234) later on. Is it safe? Or could adding or taking out files inside the archive mess things up over time? I've actually done this for years without any trouble, but now I'm worried about something happening in the future.
B
batabing47
09-07-2026, 04:18 PM #1

Does it make sense to put an encrypted file inside another encrypted file? For instance: putting "Encrypted Word.doc" into a folder called "Files.rar" with password 567, and then putting that whole package again into another archive named "Files2.rar" with password 1234. I'm doing this because I want to add more protection so hackers can't crack my first layer of security (password 1234) later on. Is it safe? Or could adding or taking out files inside the archive mess things up over time? I've actually done this for years without any trouble, but now I'm worried about something happening in the future.

K
Komodo88
Senior Member
749
09-11-2026, 06:09 AM
#2
It's not dangerous, but it offers almost no protection. If someone gets past the first line of defense, the next ones won't help much. Also, unless you are building a real lab to make nuclear power, nobody checks or cares about that file.
K
Komodo88
09-11-2026, 06:09 AM #2

It's not dangerous, but it offers almost no protection. If someone gets past the first line of defense, the next ones won't help much. Also, unless you are building a real lab to make nuclear power, nobody checks or cares about that file.

X
xanderzone317
Posting Freak
957
09-11-2026, 10:00 AM
#3
It's not really unsafe either, but it offers very little security actually. If someone can get past the first layer, then getting through the second or third should be easy too. Unless this is meant to make a working cold fusion reactor happen, nobody cares about your Word document anyway.
X
xanderzone317
09-11-2026, 10:00 AM #3

It's not really unsafe either, but it offers very little security actually. If someone can get past the first layer, then getting through the second or third should be easy too. Unless this is meant to make a working cold fusion reactor happen, nobody cares about your Word document anyway.

G
GeorgePlaysFTW
Senior Member
261
09-11-2026, 01:39 PM
#4
Yeah, people who are hackers or other sneaky guys can do that all the time. But this is just for "user area" stuff. Some bad people want to mess with my work. They can't break the locking system without me being there, but they can unlock it if I make a stupid mistake. One time he tried something while I was typing my password, and then got confused because he typed three different @ signs in 20 characters.
G
GeorgePlaysFTW
09-11-2026, 01:39 PM #4

Yeah, people who are hackers or other sneaky guys can do that all the time. But this is just for "user area" stuff. Some bad people want to mess with my work. They can't break the locking system without me being there, but they can unlock it if I make a stupid mistake. One time he tried something while I was typing my password, and then got confused because he typed three different @ signs in 20 characters.

M
maisymoon
Member
223
4 hours ago
#5
If you have an encrypted rar file or another compressed-encrypted thing like zip or 7z, let's pretend we figure out how to get a new file from that archive. The new file might actually be a real rar file, but it could also just be random junk data that looks exactly like one by chance. To check if something is really valid, you need the right password. So here is my question - How can I tell the difference between a bunch of random data that happens to look like a real rar file versus an actual encrypted rar file without the password? Last but not least: I have to assume that the names, attributes, and folder structure are all locked up too (and of course the format actually supports encryption). And yes, there must be a different password for each nested layer.
M
maisymoon
4 hours ago #5

If you have an encrypted rar file or another compressed-encrypted thing like zip or 7z, let's pretend we figure out how to get a new file from that archive. The new file might actually be a real rar file, but it could also just be random junk data that looks exactly like one by chance. To check if something is really valid, you need the right password. So here is my question - How can I tell the difference between a bunch of random data that happens to look like a real rar file versus an actual encrypted rar file without the password? Last but not least: I have to assume that the names, attributes, and folder structure are all locked up too (and of course the format actually supports encryption). And yes, there must be a different password for each nested layer.